Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Web3 Alpha Club

@Web3_AlphaClub

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,190subscribers

-21 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004493059637
TypeChannel
Username@Web3_AlphaClub
Created28 July 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Web3_AlphaClub

Growth

1,1681,2111,189.56 August 2026 — 1,211 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,205 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,168 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,190 subscribers1,1906 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,162–1,217 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 11:341,190+22
9 Aug 2026, 19:031,168-37
6 Aug 2026, 19:211,205-6
6 Aug 2026, 16:361,211first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
125.5%
avg views ÷ 1,190 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,490
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held12 (28 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total14,930
Reactions total179
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

179 reactions across 7 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
10860.3%
👎4726.3%
🔥84.47%
👍73.91%
👏42.23%
💋21.12%
😁10.559%
🤔10.559%
🥰10.559%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 179reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 07:21 UTC174 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Real-world asset (RWA) tokenization platforms are attracting increased corporate treasury interest for transparent yield generation.

2

3 Aug 2026, 18:14 UTC≈2,580 views61 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡ CODE 👉 YJNKRUEAWBYBIL5ABTZCJ5HYEI — Go to Bonus page and copy paste above code to claim. ☑ Wager over 100usd past 3days ☑ Reward: Real Money (1x Rollover) 🌐 Anti Ban Link ✉ Global 📱 Twitter 📱 Whatsapp 📱 Facebook 📱 Instagram 🚫 Warning: Don't trust any ads on Telegram—they're not official

51🔥5👏4🤔1

3 Aug 2026, 11:37 UTC≈3,370 views100 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡ CODE 👉 4PONTFWH6HEZAJFRC4NVQRX57Q — Go to Bonus page and copy paste above code to claim. ☑ Wager over 100usd past 3days ☑ Reward: Real Money (1x Rollover) 📱 Stay subscribed to this channel! More BIG BONUS CODES and exclusive rewards will be dropped later today. Don't miss the next one! 🌐 Anti Ban Link ✉ Global 📱 Twitter 📱 Whatsapp 📱 Facebook 📱 Instagram 🚫 Warning: Don't trust any ads o

👎4741👍6💋2🔥2🥰1😁1

3 Aug 2026, 06:42 UTC≈2,540 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Proof-of-Stake validator participation rates maintain historic highs, signaling continued network security and long-term staking commitment.

4👍1

2 Aug 2026, 15:22 UTC≈2,390 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Major crypto custody platforms continue expanding institutional infrastructure to support broader digital asset treasury management.

5

1 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC≈1,260 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Bitcoin’s network hash rate maintains its upward momentum, signaling robust security and miner commitment heading into the second half of the year.

31 Jul 2026, 08:13 UTC918 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ethereum’s Layer-2 ecosystem continues to process record daily transaction volumes, significantly reducing gas costs for decentralized application users.

30 Jul 2026, 06:57 UTC684 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🪙 Meme Culture: Love them or hate them, meme coins remain the ultimate test of community attention and liquidity speed. Are memes a legitimate onboarding tool for Web3, or just a temporary distraction from real utility? Be honest! 💬

29 Jul 2026, 07:01 UTC515 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🔄 DEX vs. CEX: Where is the Liquidity Moving? On-chain DEX volume is hitting record ratios compared to traditional centralized exchanges. Traders are prioritizing self-custody and transparent execution. Discussion: What percentage of your portfolio stays on-chain in cold/hot wallets versus CEXs? Share your setup! ⚖️

2🔥1

28 Jul 2026, 10:36 UTC499 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📈 Macro Watch: Rates, Liquidity & Crypto Global rate decisions and inflation updates are keeping risk markets on edge. Historically, crypto thrives when global fiat liquidity starts expanding. Do you think a macro breakout is coming soon, or are we in for more range-bound action? ⏳

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @Web3_AlphaClub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 146,794 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Web3 Alpha Club” (@Web3_AlphaClub), 1,190 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Web3_AlphaClub.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.