Channel
@Web3Pars
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
172,514subscribers
-1,691 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1002197982353 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @nftposition @Web3Pars |
| Description | 🚀 معرفی پروژههای منتخب Web3 💰 ایردراپ، رفرال و کمپینهای درآمدزا 📚 آموزش و راهنمای پروژهها 🌍 Crypto • Web3 • AI 💬 پشتیبانی: @Web3ParsSup |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Web3Pars |
Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:54 | 172,514 | -971 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 18:42 | 173,485 | -720 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:46 | 174,205 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (27 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 177,739 |
| Reactions total | 9,663 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
9,663 reactions across 17 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4,401 | 45.5% | |
| 👍 | 1,851 | 19.2% | |
| 🥰 | 926 | 9.58% | |
| 🔥 | 781 | 8.08% | |
| 🍓 | 344 | 3.56% | |
| 👏 | 282 | 2.92% | |
| 😱 | 280 | 2.90% | |
| 🐳 | 270 | 2.79% | |
| 🆒 | 151 | 1.56% | |
| 🦄 | 121 | 1.25% | |
| 💘 | 92 | 0.952% | |
| 👾 | 71 | 0.735% | |
| ⚡ | 33 | 0.342% | |
| 🕊 | 22 | 0.228% | |
| 😢 | 17 | 0.176% | |
| 😎 | 9 | 0.093% | |
| 👌 | 8 | 0.083% | |
| 👨💻 | 4 | 0.041% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,663reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚀ربات VOLTA | ماینر خودکار USDT 💰 با VOLTA میتونی از داخل تلگرام فرآیند کسب USDT رو شروع کنی. بعد از ورود، ماینر بهصورت خودکار فعال میشه و موجودی و میزان درآمدت رو از داخل ربات مشاهده میکنی. 🎁 مزایای شروع: 💵 پاداش خوشآمدگویی برای کاربران جدید 🛠 امکان فعالکردن Reinvest برای افزایش سود و بازدهی 📈 نمایش لحظهای وضعیت درآمد و سطح حساب 📈 طبق معرفی پروژه، امکان کسب درآمد تا $3000+ USDT در ماه اعلام شده؛ میزان واقعی …
❤11🥰6
این ربات دلار ماین میکنه توجه کنید تیک reinvest رو فعال کنید تا سودش بالاتر بره✅ https://t.me/volta_mining_bot?start=ref_6429858612
❤15
سلام دوستان عزیزم ، به زودی بک پروژه عالی دیگه معرفی خواهیم کرد آماده باشید 👍 داریم برداشت اش رو تست میکنیم✅
❤99👍29🆒21🐳13💘7😱4
🛠پروژه ایردراپ جدید به 1000 نفر اول گیفت تدی میده من همین الان گرفتم ، حدود 300 نفر مونده زود بزنید https://t.me/Agent301Bot/app?startapp=ref_jK0vMq
👍259❤173🥰112🔥87😢17🍓15🆒12💘7
⚠️ربات آسترا رو نزنید بی دلیل ایرانی ها رو بن میکنن⚠️ با پشتیبانی شون صحبت میکنم اگه مشکل حل شد میگم که استفاده کنید
❤267🥰96👍94🔥45💘2
🛠 ما یدونه گروه رفرال گیری هم داریم بچه ها عضو بشید❤️ https://t.me/refferaalgir
❤196👍113🥰80🔥53💘1
🙂ایردراپ جدید در بلاکچین تون 😱 طبق ادعای پروژه قراره 10,000 واحد گرام به کاربران اولیه ربات داده بشه و اطلاعات بیشتری در دسترس نیست ❓برای شرکت چیکار باید کرد؟ ربات رو استارت کنید و دوستان خودتون رو دعوت کنید فعلا تسک خاصی نداره 💎لینک ربات فقط باید استارتش کنید و منتظر باشیم قراره چه اتفاقی بیفته ممکنه بیلاخ بده که ۹۹% همین بیلاخ رو شاید بده ولی استارت ربات ضرر نداره
❤402👍196🆒100🥰75🍓23🕊22💘2
🚀 یه ربات جدید و جذاب اومده! 🎁 🔥 با دعوت هر دوست، 10⭐️ استار جایزه میگیری و میتونی از استارها برای بازی و گرفتن NFT و Gift استفاده کنی. 🎡 کارهایی که میتونی انجام بدی: ✅ گردونه رایگان روزانه ✅ دریافت استار و جایزه ✅ استفاده از استارها برای شرکت در بازیها و شانس دریافت Gift و NFT 👇 از لینک زیر وارد شو: https://t.me/GiftRushPlayBot?startapp=ref_vzai4xNarYgGFbC87Kzq9Q 💡 حتماً بخشهای رایگان ربات رو هم امتحان کن؛ …
❤491👍217🥰127🦄55🍓19⚡14🔥13💘1
اولین اثبات برداشت از سایت TechAGI⭐ برای ثبت نام در سایت کلیک کنید✅
❤587👏210😱153👍149🔥57🍓56🥰56🦄39
پلتفرم جدید TechAGI برای کسب درآمد دلاری🔥 تازه چند روزه راهاندازی شده و جزو اولین نفراتی هستیم که واردش میشیم🤩 🔴با 10 20 دلار وارد بشید 🔴 آموزش: این پلتفرم اینطوریه که شما یک پنل فعال میکنید و روزانه به قسمت معاملات سر میزنید یک معامله رو تایید میکنید تا انجام بشه بعد 30 ثانیه سودشو دریافت میکنید🤑 درصد سود Tech-01 بین 2.10% تا 2.60% است برای درآمد بیشتر پنل های دیگه رو بررسی کنید💥 دو بخش رفرال گیری داره🗣️ 1…
❤375🔥189😱123👏72👍49💘40🥰40🍓19
سلام دوستان عزیز، فعلاً پروژه سرمایهگذاری جدیدی معرفی نشده است. تا زمانی که پروژه مناسب و قابل بررسی بعدی پیدا نشه، روی هیچکدوم از پلتفرمهایی که قبلاً معرفی شدهاند سرمایهگذاری جدید انجام ندید. ❌ اگر داخل یکی از پروژهها فعالیت دارید، پیشنهاد میکنم تا جایی که امکانش هست سود و سرمایهتون رو برداشت کنید و منتظر معرفی پروژه بعدی باشید. 💰✅ 📌 همونطور که میدونید، در این دسته از پلتفرمها معمولاً بهترین فرصتها در رو…
❤388🔥162🥰146👾71👍31🍓27🦄27
⚠️ فقط یه نکته دوستانه: به نظر من سرمایهگذاری داخل این بازی ارزشش رو نداره. اگه میخواید ازش درآمد داشته باشید، باید وقت بذارید، بازی کنید، مأموریتها رو انجام بدید و فعالیت داشته باشید. 🎮 من هم تونستم برداشت انجام بدم، اما بخش زیادی از اون به خاطر زیرمجموعهگیری بوده. 👍
❤322👍176🐳150🔥50🆒3
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Web3Pars. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 329,857 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🚀 Web3Pars | پروژههای درآمد دلاری” (@Web3Pars), 172,514 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Web3Pars.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.