Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ما آدما

Channel

ما آدما

@WeTheHumans

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,219subscribers

-26 since we began measuring on 20 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001422241964
TypeChannel
Username@WeTheHumans
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded20 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/WeTheHumans

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,2191,2451,23220 August 2026 — 1,245 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,245 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,244 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,238 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,231 subscribers7 September 2026 — 1,228 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,223 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,219 subscribers20 August 202615 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 26 days, net -26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,215–1,249 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 07:411,219-4
12 Sept 2026, 02:001,223-5
7 Sept 2026, 16:221,228-3
2 Sept 2026, 16:441,231-7
30 Aug 2026, 04:561,238-6
24 Aug 2026, 08:551,244-1
20 Aug 2026, 13:451,245no change
20 Aug 2026, 13:301,245first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 January 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Jul 2026, 12:20 UTC162 viewsread 20 August 2026
File

حافظا! تکیه بر ایّام چو سهو است و خطا من چرا عِشرتِ امروز به فردا فکنم؟

11 Jun 2026, 18:27 UTC196 viewsread 20 August 2026

Nothing you say Will ever be wrong 'Cause it just feels good being in your arms هیچ‌کدوم از حرفات هیچ‌وقت اشتباه نیستن آخه بودن تو آغوشت واقعاً حس خوبی میده And I'm running with you As fast as I can Singing to myself I wanna hold your hand و من پا به پای تو می‌دوم با تمام سرعتی که دارم زیر لب با خودم می‌خونم: «دلم می‌خواد دستاتو بگیرم» And we're going downtown 'Cause we feel like running around و داریم می‌ریم وسط شهر

30 May 2026, 22:58 UTC155 viewsread 20 August 2026

شباهت نمی‌دانم چقدر با کلمه‌ی «شباهت» یا «همانندی» ارتباط می‌گیرید؟ یعنی اولین حسی که بعد از شنیدن این کلمه‌ها پیدا می‌کنید چیست؟ مثبت است یا منفی؟ باز است و خنک و گواراست، یا تنگ است و تلخ است و همراه با حس خفقان؟ اصلاً شباهت یعنی چه؟ شباهت در کجا؟ شبیه بودن دو خودرو؟ دو لباس؟ دو صدا؟ دو مکان؟ شبیه بودن دو نگاه؟ دو باور؟ شباهت بین دو ایده؟ دو فکر؟ دو نفر؟ شباهت‌ غذاهایی که در خانه‌‌ی ما و خانه‌ی همسایه طبخ و میل م

29 May 2026, 00:41 UTC181 viewsread 20 August 2026

نوشتن و خواندن شاید خاصیت درمانی داشته باشد و البته نه هر نوشتن و هر خواندنی. نوشتنی که در ادامه‌ی شلوغی‌های یک ذهن پریشان است، چیزی جز صحبت‌های پریشان با خود نیست. این نوشتن شبیه انتشار فرکانس‌های نامنظم و پراکنده‌ای‌ است که در نهایت پیام معناداری از آن دریافت نمی‌شود. وقتی خواننده آن را می‌خواند، امواجی دریافت می‌کند اما هر موج برای خودش یک طرف است، یکی بالا، یکی پایین، یکی چپ، یکی راست. بیچاره خواننده نمی‌داند به

16 Feb 2026, 08:19 UTC251 viewsread 20 August 2026

⛩ یک داستان کهن ژاپنی روزگاری مردی بود که از صخره‌ها سنگ می‌تراشید. کارش بسیار سخت بود و بسیار تلاش می‌کرد، اما دستمزدش اندک بود و راضی نبود. آهی کشید و فریاد زد: «آه، کاش ثروتمند بودم تا می‌توانستم روی تختی با روکش ابریشمی استراحت کنم.» فرشته‌ای از آسمان فرود آمد و گفت: «همانی باش که گفتی.» او ثروتمند شد و بر تختی با روکش ابریشم استراحت می‌کرد. روزی پادشاهِ آن سرزمین از آنجا گذشت؛ سوارکارانی در جلو و پشت کالسکه‌اش

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @WeTheHumans. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

DrBitaHosseini
@drbitahosseini · 35,659
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 2 September 2026
کانال متوسطه دوم | منابع کنکور ۱۴۰۶
@motavassete_2 · 68,527
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ما آدما” (@WeTheHumans), 1,219 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WeTheHumans.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.