Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

微信搬运工(旧)

@WeChatEssence

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

13,477subscribers

-57 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001333303289
TypeChannel
Username@WeChatEssence
Description本频道两个目的,1. 丰富电报上的中文内容(不可否认还是有很多非政治的优质内容在微信公众号里),2. 有些微信的内容分享了之后就和谐了,本频道可以做个备份。试运营中,欢迎订阅。 目前对于超长文章(超过三万字的)只能发前一部分,剩余内容请参阅原文链接。 特别声明:转发不代表支持,完全是机器人处理。 友情频道:蛋挞报 @pincongessence
Created12 June 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/WeChatEssence

Growth

13,47713,53413,505.56 August 2026 — 13,534 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,527 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,510 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,505 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,498 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,485 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,477 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 6 days, net -57. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,468–13,543 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 09:2213,477-8
11 Aug 2026, 06:2113,485-13
10 Aug 2026, 06:0113,498-7
9 Aug 2026, 03:5413,505-5
8 Aug 2026, 05:2713,510-17
7 Aug 2026, 04:3513,527-7
6 Aug 2026, 11:0513,534first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 August 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 August 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
18
Links
10,900

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

26 Aug 2024, 04:47 UTC≈41,800 viewsread 13 August 2026

“不拖!不等!”邓小平一锤定音,吹响教育界拨乱反正第一声号角 | 原文

26 Aug 2024, 00:37 UTC≈36,200 viewsread 13 August 2026

《黑神话》:最烂的商业模式下,最赚钱的作品 | 原文

25 Aug 2024, 08:18 UTC≈23,800 viewsread 13 August 2026

被捕的Telegram创始人:传奇创业史及其加密野心 | 原文

25 Aug 2024, 04:16 UTC≈16,900 viewsread 13 August 2026

突发: Telegram 创始人 Pavel Durov 在法国被捕 执法机构指控提及加密货币 TON 紧急回应 | 原文

23 Aug 2024, 02:59 UTC≈10,100 viewsread 13 August 2026

“有毒的”亲子关系已成为一种刻板印象,但现实远更复杂 | 专访 | 原文

21 Aug 2024, 22:17 UTC≈5,980 viewsread 13 August 2026

骇人!美国华人大学教授杀妻案,又一起高学历人员枪杀案,这背后的真相究竟为何? | 原文

21 Aug 2024, 09:59 UTC≈5,110 viewsread 13 August 2026

小红书不想成为「大厂」:保持灵动的唯一解法 | 原文

21 Aug 2024, 05:52 UTC≈4,690 viewsread 13 August 2026

98岁家庭主妇被授予荣誉博士学位,她的发现引发物理学家重新思考对称性 | 原文

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @WeChatEssence. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 292,724 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“微信搬运工(旧)” (@WeChatEssence), 13,477 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WeChatEssence.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.