Sticker, posted without a caption
Channel
[ BUBAR ] RรGUE ๐ฅ
@WeAreRogue
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry
5,612subscribers
-44 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 3,162โ10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001614247831 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @WeAreRogue |
| Created | 21 December 2023 โ measured โ dated from the channelโs first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/WeAreRogue |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:41 | 5,612 | -18 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:02 | 5,630 | -26 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:30 | 5,656 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:19 | 5,656 | first reading |
Engagement
4 posts held, back to 21 December 2023 โ the reader has reached the start of this channelโs public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 8 pagesof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
38 reactions across 1 post, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ๐ณ | 13 | 34.2% | |
| ๐ | 3 | 7.89% | |
| ๐พ | 3 | 7.89% | |
| ๐ | 3 | 7.89% | |
| ๐ | 3 | 7.89% | |
| ๐ฏ | 3 | 7.89% | |
| โก | 2 | 5.26% | |
| ๐ | 2 | 5.26% | |
| ๐พ | 2 | 5.26% | |
| ๐ | 2 | 5.26% | |
| ๐ | 2 | 5.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 38reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 21 December 2023 to 25 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
SURAT RESMI RรGUE โขโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโโข Tanggal : 25/10/2025 Perihal : Pembubaran Lampiran : 1 Kepada Yth. Seluruh member dan admin @WeAreRogue. Dengan adanya surat ini, saya Mirae Janei've selaku founder dari RรGUE menyatakan bahwa RรGUE resmi DIBUBARKAN. Dengan alasan, karena seluruh admin sudah memasuki masa sibuk di real life nya dan kami fown sudah tidak bisa membagi waktu antara rp / rl lagi. Sehinggโฆ
๐ณ13๐3๐พ3๐ 3๐3๐ฏ3โก2๐พ2
Channel name was changed to ยซ[ BUBAR ] RรGUE ๐ฅยป
Channel created
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @WeAreRogue. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank โ 380,517 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 34 registered channels โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@ELPHIDRAGENCY ยท 6864 postsScandalous's.
@candalous ยท 9392 postsBUBAR. โ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐
@DEXXTICUSOFC ยท 5,4122 postsMP/PS DEFOXERS
@ARSIPDEFOXER ยท 191 postARSIP DETECTIVE RPW
@drpwarchive ยท 231 postPARTNERSHIP GALAXTOR
@GALAXTORPS ยท 371 postฤฑllฤฑ GRAYส CORP PARTNERS
@GrayPartners ยท 61 postArsip Helios
@heliosps ยท 51 post[MEMORIES] ๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐
@josgarcity ยท 4,6681 post๐ฃ๐ฆ ๐ล๐จ๐ญ๐จ
@JOUZUPS ยท 391 post๐๐๐ง๐๐๐ฅ๐๐ข๐ก ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐๐ก๐๐ฆ๐ฆ ๐ฃ๐๐ฅ๐ง๐ก๐๐ฅ
@KolegaAethereon ยท 211 postKOLEGA JOVGLAR
@KOLEGAJVG ยท 111 post๐๐๐๐ ๐พ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ฟ'๐พ๐๐ผ๐
@MPPSCDN ยท 101 post๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
@MPPSCVZ ยท 91 post๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐
@MPPSENIGMATICS ยท 51 post๐ ๐ฃ๐ฃ๐ฆ ๐ฃ๐ ๐จ
@MppsPMU ยท 71 postArsip Mavedause
@mvdsarchive ยท 91 postNISKARECTO PS
@NISKARECTOPS ยท 221 postROMBAK | โฒ ๊ฆฉ๊ฆถ๊ฆ โณ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐
@PRABANARAGENCY ยท 1,7811 post๐๐ ๐ฮนy๐and ๐๐ผ๐๐ฝ๐ถ๐๐ฎ๐น
@PSDIYLAND ยท 201 postPATNERSHIP TIGERS HIGH SCHOOL
@pstigersool ยท 101 post๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐
@psvwagency ยท 81 postMPPS TRIGOZ
@temantrigoz ยท 71 post๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
@valentmpps ยท 141 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ[ BUBAR ] RรGUE ๐ฅโ (@WeAreRogue), 5,612 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WeAreRogue.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.