کاش میتونستم بفهمم واقعا کیام؛ چرا زندهام و از زندگی چی میخوام.

Channel
Middle of Nowhere
@WastedInWasteland
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
155subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001804785280 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @WastedInWasteland |
| Description | You can call me whatever you want - "My story isn't pleasant, it's not sweet and harmonious like the invented stories..." - ▸ Contact (anonymous): @SomeoneMailboxbot |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/WastedInWasteland |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:46 | 155 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 155 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 103.9%
- avg views ÷ 155 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 161
- 10 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 10
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (7 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,611 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 18:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 143
- Videos
- 18
- Links
- 52
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
چرا انقدر معمولی بودن رو پس میزنم؟ چه چیز توی عادی زندگی کردن هست که انقدر منو میترسونه؟ چرا نمیتونم مثل بقیه فقط به اینکه درس بخونم، کار کنم، ماشین بخرم، ازدواج کنم و بچه دار بشم فکر بکنم؟ نکنه اینا هم همش اَداست؟ چرا همیشه از همه چیز ناراضی ام؟
آیا اصلا «خود»ای وجود داره؟ یا همش توهمه و تمایل ذهن، واسه ساختن یه حصار در برابر آزادی و تغییر؟
آیا فایدهای داره به مقصدی برسی که هیچوقت مقصد خودت نبوده؟
اگه آخرش به تمام چیزهایی که بهم گفتن باید بخوام برسم، اما وسط این راه خودمو گم کرده باشم، آیا واقعا چیزی به دست آوردم و موفق شدم؟
_ دستهگلی برای الجرنون داستان چارلی گوردونه؛ مردی با بهرهی هوشی پایین که برای شرکت در یک پژوهش علمی انتخاب میشه. هدف این پژوهش افزایش هوشه و نتیجه هم فراتر از انتظار پیش میره؛ چارلی نه تنها به سطح عادی میرسه، بلکه به فردی با هوش خارقالعاده تبدیل میشه. آخر داستان رو هم اسپویل نمیکنم. با اینکه کتاب توی ژانر علمیتخیلی قرار گرفته، به جز ایدهی عمل جراحی افزایش هوش، عنصر علمیتخیلی پررنگ دیگهای نداره و بیشتر یه ر…
دسته گلی برای الجرنون رو خوندم و خیلی خوشم اومد، بعد فهمیدم رکب خوردم و اینی که من خوندم نسخهی اولیه و کوتاه داستانه و بعدا نویسنده رمانش کرده. فکر کن روند رشد و زوال چارلی گوردون رو با تمام جزئیات بخونی... ولی نسخهی کوتاه هم خیلی کامل بود. مفاهیمی که نویسنده سعی داشت برسونه به خوبی منتقل شدن؛ مختصر و مفید.
امان از بودجهی محدود و لیست خرید کتاب نامحدود
چند وقت دیگه کتاب خریدن در حد سفارش ساخت شمشیر و خنجر تزئینی به آهنگری دادن تبدیل میشه به یک تفریح تاریخی.
منظورتون چیه؟ اینا چه قیمتاییه؟ با دیدنشون تپش قلب گرفتم. من هنوز قیمت ۵٠٠-۶٠٠ تومن برام عادی نشده... هیچ جوره تو مغزم نمیگنجه یه کتاب ۴٠٠ الی ۶٠٠ صفحهای با جلد شومیز رو باید با این قیمتا خرید.
مثلا قرار بود دیگه پستای بلند و این مدلی ننویسم ولی دونگ مان درونم نمیذاره شما هم اگر دوست داشتید نظرتو بگید و با هم دربارهش حرف بزنیم.
#Film | ⌜ Obsession 2025 ⌟ _ راستش دلیل دیدن این فیلم موجی بود که این روزها راه افتاده؛ هم فروش فوقالعادهای داشته، هم تقریبا همه جا ازش تعریف میشه. وگرنه من اصولا با ژانر ترسناک ارتباط برقرار نمیکنم و کمتر سراغش میرم. قبل از هر چیزی هم بگم که این نوشته تحلیل فیلم نیست؛ صرفا تجربهی شخصی من از تماشاشه و هیچ اعتباری فراتر از سلیقهی خودم نداره. به نظرم به عنوان یک اثر سینمایی، فیلم کار تمیزیه. فیلمنامه منسجمه، دیا…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @WastedInWasteland. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Middle of Nowhere” (@WastedInWasteland), 155 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WastedInWasteland.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.