Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝐖𝐀𝐑-𝐌𝐎𝐍𝐆𝐄𝐑

@War_monger1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

155subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002321509886
TypeChannel
Username@War_monger1
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/War_monger1

Growth

15510 Aug 2026, 01:47 — 155 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 03:51 — 155 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 01:4710 Aug 2026, 03:51
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 154–156 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 03:51155no change
10 Aug 2026, 01:47155first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.1%
avg views ÷ 155 subscribers
Avg views / post
24.9
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
14.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held20 (6 August 20269 August 2026)
Views total498
Reactions total4
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 01:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

4 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 12:17 UTC5 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @WBLGAME_MAINPhoto

⚔️ به جهان WARBORN LEGION خوش آمدید ⚔️ ⭐️با افتخار شما را به آغاز سیزن جنگ‌های صد ساله دعوت می‌کنیم دورانی که سرنوشت پادشاهی‌ها با شمشیر، سیاست و اتحادها رقم می‌خورد⭐️ 🗓 سال ۱۳۳۷ میلادی😀 فرانسه یا انگلستان؟ تاج پادشاهی یا سقوط؟ امپراتوری روم مقدس یا قدرت نوظهور عثمانی؟ انتخاب با توست... در این میدان، تنها قدرت کافی نیست؛ اتحادها باید حفظ شوند، ارتش‌ها باید فرمان ببرند و نام پادشاهی تو باید در میان صفحات تاریخ باق

Signed ⚚𝙱𝙸𝙶𝚂𝙼𝙾𝙺𝙴

9 Aug 2026, 12:07 UTC17 viewsread 10 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

Signed ⚚𝙱𝙸𝙶𝚂𝙼𝙾𝙺𝙴

9 Aug 2026, 12:07 UTC18 viewsread 10 August 2026

عاشق شدم

Signed ⚚𝙱𝙸𝙶𝚂𝙼𝙾𝙺𝙴

9 Aug 2026, 07:06 UTC20 viewsread 10 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

Signed ⚚𝙱𝙸𝙶𝚂𝙼𝙾𝙺𝙴

8 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTC37 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

𓊈 𝙒𝘼𝙍-𝙈𝙊𝙉𝙂𝙀𝙍 𓊉𓊈 𝙎𝙚𝙖𝙨𝙤𝙣-𝟐𝟏 𓊉 ♜ قلعه اروندال آخرین سنگر پادشاهی درهم کوبیده شد و سر متیو کشته شد، تمامی لرد های وفادار به پادشاه نیز نتوانستند تاج و تخت را حفظ و بازگرداند و لرد های خائن بارکلی و پاسکال توانستند ارتش پادشاه که از سوی اسکاتلند می‌آمدند را شکست داده و پادشاه را دستگیر کنند آنها پادشاه را به قتل رسانده و بدن اورا به چهار بخش و هر بخش را به چهارسوی بریتانیا فرستاده‌اند پیامی که می‌گفت پادشاه پیر کنار رفته

Signed ⚚𝙱𝙸𝙶𝚂𝙼𝙾𝙺𝙴

8 Aug 2026, 13:39 UTC28 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

همیشه در انتخاب دوستاتون محتاد باشید

Signed ⚚𝙱𝙸𝙶𝚂𝙼𝙾𝙺𝙴

8 Aug 2026, 08:44 UTC28 viewsread 10 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

Signed ⚚𝙱𝙸𝙶𝚂𝙼𝙾𝙺𝙴

7 Aug 2026, 19:29 UTC31 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

══════════════════════ ꧁لیست جنگ ها꧂ [نبرد ولف] | مهاجم: سر بارکلی | مهاجم: سر پاسکال | مدافع : متیو استیل ☀️ هوای مه‌آلود و سرد بارانی 📝 1 صفحه و 7 عکس 📍قلعه اروندال ⏰ مهلت ارسال تا ساعت 6 عصر فردا ════════════════════ • نبرد تنها در یک روز رخ می‌دهد و دو ارتش مقابل هم هست و تصواویر مکان نبرد به گپ های شما ارسال خواهد شد

Signed ⚚𝙱𝙸𝙶𝚂𝙼𝙾𝙺𝙴

7 Aug 2026, 10:45 UTC27 viewsread 10 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

Signed 𝐒𝐈𝐑 𝐈𝐑𝐀𝐍

7 Aug 2026, 10:45 UTC26 viewsread 10 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

Signed ⚚𝙱𝙸𝙶𝚂𝙼𝙾𝙺𝙴

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @War_monger1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,247,996 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐖𝐀𝐑-𝐌𝐎𝐍𝐆𝐄𝐑” (@War_monger1), 155 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/War_monger1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.