各位大佬想问一下拯救者y9000p2022款i9-12900h➕rtx3070ti大学4年够不够用😢 📮投稿 ☘️频道 🐧聊天

Channel
万事屋🗳️有问必答
@WantAnswer
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
54,228subscribers
+982 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002166345633 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @WantAnswer |
| Description | 禁止涉及隐私、交易、兼职、黑灰产、业务类内容投稿。 不一定能找到答案,但希望能有所收获。 问题来自于群友投稿,希望可以集思广益,重在参与,打破信息差。 📮投稿 @WantAnswerBot |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/WantAnswer |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:28 | 54,228 | +263 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:58 | 53,965 | +187 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:26 | 53,778 | +198 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 53,580 | +194 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:18 | 53,386 | +140 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:03 | 53,246 | first reading |
Engagement
140 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.98%
- avg views ÷ 54,228 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,080
- 140 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.07%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 140
- of 140 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 41 of 140 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 140 (6 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 150,634 |
| Reactions total | 35 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 19:36 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈199
- Videos
- ≈2
- Links
- ≈6,130
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
35 reactions across 22 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 23 | 65.7% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 17.1% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 5.71% | |
| 🖕 | 2 | 5.71% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 2.86% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 2.86% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 140 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 140 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 3
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 3
- of 140 we hold a reading for · 2%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @WantAnswer. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 140 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
各位大牛想问一下红魔手机能不能刷coloros如果可以bug多不多🌷 📮投稿 ☘️频道 🐧聊天
各位大佬们如何人在国内办理香港自己实名的电话卡或者任何国外的电话卡 📮投稿 ☘️频道 🐧聊天
各位哥哥姐姐们,小弟曾在某厂B端做产品经理,现在跟朋友做企业SaaS创业,刚跑完种子轮,目前卡在PMF阶段。不认同靠烧钱换规模的逻辑,但也不想太慢被竞品抄了底。想问问,先打磨标准化产品功能,和先拿标杆客户做定制化跑通营收,哪种路径更容易拿到下一轮融资? 📮投稿 ☘️频道 🐧聊天
哥哥姐姐们好,基于 Zepp life 绑定微信刷步的方案是失效了嘛?用邮箱注册的,接着在 https://steps.hubp.de 上刷了,然后绑定微信,zepp life app 里同步了,但微信运动里没同步是怎么回事呢?绑QQ可以同步。 📮投稿 ☘️频道 🐧聊天
为什么我一搜城市群组,立马有很多人加我,是什么外挂啊? 📮投稿 ☘️频道 🐧聊天
各位帅哥美女请问一下彪马的麂皮材质的鞋怎么刷呀?用的抖音的方法给那个白色的彪马给染了一点蓝色的了有没有什么办法把这个去除掉啊?这种鞋该怎么打理啊😭😭😭 📮投稿 ☘️频道 🐧聊天
我想问问我做tiktok直播,网络换了很多次,还是进一些非洲人,进不了美国人 📮投稿 ☘️频道 🐧聊天
有没有大神能告诉我,怎么可以一直免费查看路透社新闻啊 📮投稿 ☘️频道 🐧聊天
想ai生成视频 各位大神有没有不用花钱的 效果堪比可灵 既梦那样的skill或者模型啊 📮投稿 ☘️频道 🐧聊天
有人搞算力租赁吗,收入怎么样,是不是真像抖音上说的那么理想 📮投稿 ☘️频道 🐧聊天
👍1
各位大佬们,我这个月20号要去韩国首尔玩,签证下来了,但我们是个人去。去玩四天,但是人在安徽,这边附近看机票有点贵了,想知道有什么便宜的方法 📮投稿 ☘️频道 🐧聊天
Showing the 12 most recent of 140 posts we hold for @WantAnswer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 532,348 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“万事屋🗳️有问必答” (@WantAnswer), 54,228 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WantAnswer.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.