Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for WAGMI HUB 🇧🇩 Bangladesh Chat

Supergroup

WAGMI HUB 🇧🇩 Bangladesh Chat

@WagmiHub_Chat_Bangladesh

Has discussion group

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry

6,505members

-1,001 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

41 online right now

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002235824716
TypeSupergroup
Username@WagmiHub_Chat_Bangladesh
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded26 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/WagmiHub_Chat_Bangladesh

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,5057,5067,005.56 August 2026 — 7,506 members9 August 2026 — 7,466 members12 August 2026 — 7,424 members15 August 2026 — 7,394 members18 August 2026 — 7,362 members21 August 2026 — 7,330 members24 August 2026 — 7,288 members26 August 2026 — 7,288 members28 August 2026 — 7,251 members30 August 2026 — 7,221 members2 September 2026 — 7,182 members7 September 2026 — 7,130 members11 September 2026 — 7,073 members15 September 2026 — 7,047 members19 September 2026 — 7,017 members30 September 2026 — 6,895 members7 October 2026 — 6,832 members13 October 2026 — 6,765 members16 October 2026 — 6,723 members19 October 2026 — 6,705 members22 October 2026 — 6,662 members25 October 2026 — 6,645 members28 October 2026 — 6,604 members1 November 2026 — 6,549 members4 November 2026 — 6,528 members7 November 2026 — 6,505 members6 August 20267 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 93 days, net -1,001. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,355–7,656 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every members count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)MembersChange
7 Nov 2026, 03:076,505-23
4 Nov 2026, 03:366,528-21
1 Nov 2026, 01:576,549-55
28 Oct 2026, 15:566,604-41
25 Oct 2026, 17:306,645-17
22 Oct 2026, 17:166,662-43
19 Oct 2026, 07:156,705-18
16 Oct 2026, 16:506,723-42
13 Oct 2026, 10:566,765-67
7 Oct 2026, 06:386,832-63
30 Sept 2026, 00:016,895-122
19 Sept 2026, 14:597,017-30
15 Sept 2026, 08:187,047-26
11 Sept 2026, 18:397,073-57
7 Sept 2026, 11:387,130-52
2 Sept 2026, 19:067,182-39
30 Aug 2026, 21:247,221-30
28 Aug 2026, 05:587,251-37
26 Aug 2026, 21:247,288no change
24 Aug 2026, 22:597,288first reading

Engagement

No public post preview. We read this entry on 3 November 2026 and Telegram serves no public post stream for it — the channel has previews switched off, or it is a group or bot with no readable feed. Views, reactions and engagement rates cannot be measured from the outside for an entry in this state, so we publish none. Subscriber counts above are unaffected.

Mentions

Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

WAGMI HUB 🇮🇳 News
@WagmiHubNews_Indian · 12,762
189 posts
WAGMI HUB 🇧🇩 বাংলা News
@WagmiHubNews_Bangladesh · 8,099
121 posts
Cyber Finance <> WAGMI HUB 🇧🇩 বাংলা News
@cfi_bd · 6
1 post
Cyber Finance <> WAGMI HUB 🇧🇩 Bangladesh Chat
@cfi_bd_chat · 5
1 post
Cyber Finance <> WAGMI HUB 🇨🇳 官方中文社区
@cfi_chi · 3
1 post
Cyber Finance <> WAGMI HUB 🌍 СНГ Новости
@cfi_cis · 3
1 post
Cyber Finance <> WAGMI HUB 🌍 CIS-русскоязычный
@cfi_cis_chat · 10
1 post
Cyber Finance <> WAGMI HUB 🇨🇳 中文 News
@cfi_cn · 3
1 post
Cyber Finance <> WAGMI HUB 🇩🇪 Deutschland
@cfi_de · 13
1 post
Cyber Finance <> WAGMI HUB 🇩🇪 Deutschland Chat
@cfi_de_chat · 3
1 post
Cyber Finance <> WAGMI HUB 🇪🇸 Noticias en Español
@cfi_es · 3
1 post
Cyber Finance <> WAGMI HUB 🇪🇸 Español
@cfi_esp · 4
1 post
Cyber Finance <> WAGMI HUB 🌍 فارسی میں خبریں۔
@cfi_farsi · 7
1 post
Cyber Finance <> WAGMI HUB 🇫🇷 Nouvelles en Français
@cfi_fr · 4
1 post
Cyber Finance <> WAGMI HUB 🇮🇩 Bahasa Indonesia News
@cfi_indonesia · 6
1 post
Cyber Finance <> WAGMI HUB 🇲🇾 Malay
@cfi_my_chat · 3
1 post
Cyber Finance <> WAGMI HUB 🇵🇹 Português
@cfi_pt_chat · 3
1 post
Cyber Finance <> WAGMI HUB 🇻🇳Tiếng Việt
@cfi_vn_chat · 38
1 post
Cyber Finance <> WAGMI HUB | Community 💬
@CyberFinanceChat · 1,207
1 post
Cyber Finance <> WAGMI HUB 🇮🇳 News
@CyberFinanceIndia · 2
1 post
WAGMI HUB | News 🗞
@WagmiHub_News · 1,013,000
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“WAGMI HUB 🇧🇩 Bangladesh Chat” (@WagmiHub_Chat_Bangladesh), 6,505 members as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WagmiHub_Chat_Bangladesh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.