This one hits me hard. Saved mine from it all But it wasnt easy Thank the lord 🙏❤️

Channel
WE THE PEOPLE NCSWIC
@WTPDACORUM
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
25subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001895798772 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @WTPDACORUM |
| Description | Make your own mind up. I share what the internet shows me🤷♂️ Wild times 🤔🤷♂️😳 WWG1WGA - NCSWIC https://t.me/we_are_the_storm_uk1776 https://t.me/realKarliBonne https://t.me/realx22report https://t.me/mrtruthbombchat |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/WTPDACORUM |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:18 | 25 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:31 | 25 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 11 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.00%
- avg views ÷ 25 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1.0
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 20 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 09:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈26,000
- Videos
- ≈22,100
- Links
- ≈22,400
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 22s
- Average length
- 22s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
I am at a loss for words today… Countless women during Covid had miscarriages and it’s now proven THEY had strong signals their vaccines caused miscarriages, and yet, the world did not stop for a second and grasp what the hell we just learned today. A large scale mass sacrifice to satan himself took place… and in no other reality would this be acceptable—our hearts would break, and those responsible would perish mi…
Why are we looking so closely at the WNBA? I’d wager not 2% of the followers here have watched a single game. I’ve given it a try. Frankly, it’s painful to watch. Simply put, I don’t give a shit about the WNBA as a sports league. However, I do care about the people who care about the WNBA. They have been fed this weird, woke, fake hair and cat fighting spectacle that until pretty recently was subsidized by the N…
Yeah Cant stand Piers And the shit hes done over the years without accountability makes me sick
👀🤔
Piers Morgan can block people all he wants. At the end of the day we have his old tweets. He knew Covid was a scam and pushed their agenda anyway. No amount of ‘I was wrong’ and ‘I’m sorry’ will change the fact he’s a deep state c**t!! https://x.com/real_shirelass/status/2087086767602049404?s=46
Sometimes there are no words. GRRRRRR! A short drop and a sudden stop would be too easy. https://fxtwitter.com/ericldaugh/status/2086886438235201765
Not too sure about the legality of Trump doing a third term by this route, but the "Big Hair" memes and gifs are hilarious. 😂 https://fxtwitter.com/i/status/2086867028309111239
Senator Rand Paul I visited Fort Knox today. The dollar has lost 97% of its purchasing power since the Fed opened in 1913. $100 then is worth just over $3,300 today. This is no accident. Congress spends without limit, while the Fed prints the difference. 19:13 · 10 ago 2026 https://x.com/SenRandPaul/status/2086863430623899673
https://nypost.com/2026/08/10/us-news/hunter-biden-tells-laptop-lies-in-fib-filled-tucker-carlson-interview/?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=nypost
Video, posted without a caption
👀🤔🤷♂️
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @WTPDACORUM. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@PepeDeluxed · 57,6466 postsProfessor Patriot
@professor_patriot_official · 13,3313 postsMidnight Rider Channel 🇺🇸
@realKarliBonne · 187,7552 postsThe Yorkshire Lass
@theyorkshirelassnews · 28,5042 postsMJTruth
@candlesinthenight · 95,1671 postGREATAWAKENING
@greatawakening369 · 1,1341 postThe SCIF
@TheIntelSCIF · 6,1161 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“WE THE PEOPLE NCSWIC” (@WTPDACORUM), 25 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WTPDACORUM.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.