Channel
@WLGZ666_bot
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
100,535subscribers
-33 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001818357692 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @WLGZ666_bot |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/WLGZ666_bot |
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
53.1 average views per post against 100,535 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.053%. Across the 6,728 registered channels in the same cohort — 100,003–316,210 subscribers — the middle half sit between 2.15% and 14.2%, with a median of 6.00%.
| Window | 30 days (16 July 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 23 of 23 published in the window (23 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 1,221 |
| Mature posts only | 0.056% over 16 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 100,535 measured 14 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b100000 · 6,728 channels · p10 0.711% · p25 2.15% · p50 6.00% · p75 14.2% · p90 27.1% |
| Position in cohort | 0.803th percentile · 1/111 the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.287% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Chinese · 100.0%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 15 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:55 | 100,535 | -5 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:33 | 100,540 | -5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:23 | 100,545 | -8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:22 | 100,553 | -9 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:51 | 100,562 | -7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:28 | 100,569 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 100,568 | first reading |
23 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 23 (7 August 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,221 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 20:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
视频介绍1V是什么意思❓ V就是视频，1V就是1个视频，多少V就是多少个视频 本群是预览群 完整版视频每天更新在会员群 会员群每天和预览群同步更新 会员群也是飞机电报群 新手不会搜索 👉点我看搜索方法 新手不会搜索 👉点我看搜索方法 👉先了解会员 👉先了解会员 👉超快VPN加速器秒开视频 👉超快VPN加速器秒开视频 ‼️视频都来自互联网，如有侵权请联系客服，秒删 📱客服 @WLGZ110 📱客服 @WLGZ110
温馨提示； 官方不会给任何人发送消息 官方不会给任何人发送消息 ‼️如果收到这些信息，千万不要点击信息中的的链接，有病毒，直接举报拉黑 ‼️类似这些信息都是骗子，想盗取你的信息和账号，甚至会盗取你手机电脑里面的钱包
#舞团系列.随意吧 乃圆 极品身材御姐模特 SM口球乳夹裸舞自慰 5V
#舞团系列.绝对舞力 Patreon 付费8月定制 高跟长腿御姐情趣骚舞 第2弹 4V
#舞团系列.King8 静茹 高颜嫩妹女神情趣漏点裸舞 第2期 8V
#视讯.视讯 糖宝 一对一裸聊 大长腿无毛穴道具自慰高潮 1V 10分钟
#来秀.来秀 小虎牙 真空凸点葡萄颗粒饱满 反差骚舞 2V
#来秀.来秀 甜妹er 性感诱惑疯狂漏内骚舞 11期 6V
#虎牙.虎牙 翁馨.小酒窝翁馨.翁猪猪 极品巨乳身材 巨乳抖奶甩奶 骚舞整活 115V
#虎牙.虎牙 刘钞钞 抖胸舞等大尺度骚舞合集 美乳超弹 85V
视频介绍1V是什么意思❓ V就是视频，1V就是1个视频，多少V就是多少个视频 本群是预览群 完整版视频每天更新在会员群 会员群每天和预览群同步更新 会员群也是飞机电报群 新手不会搜索 👉点我看搜索方法 新手不会搜索 👉点我看搜索方法 👉先了解会员 👉先了解会员 👉超快VPN加速器秒开视频 👉超快VPN加速器秒开视频 ‼️视频都来自互联网，如有侵权请联系客服，秒删 📱客服 @WLGZ110 📱客服 @WLGZ110
温馨提示； 官方不会给任何人发送消息 官方不会给任何人发送消息 ‼️如果收到这些信息，千万不要点击信息中的的链接，有病毒，直接举报拉黑 ‼️类似这些信息都是骗子，想盗取你的信息和账号，甚至会盗取你手机电脑里面的钱包
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @WLGZ666_bot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 990,490 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“网络公主❣️预览群” (@WLGZ666_bot), 100,535 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WLGZ666_bot.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.