Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 武汉工兵团|报告榜

Channel

武汉工兵团|报告榜

@WHGBPORT

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,854subscribers

+191 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003362792735
TypeChannel
Username@WHGBPORT
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/WHGBPORT

Growth

5,6635,8545,758.57 August 2026 — 5,663 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,663 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,686 subscribers14 August 2026 — 5,732 subscribers17 August 2026 — 5,762 subscribers20 August 2026 — 5,787 subscribers24 August 2026 — 5,830 subscribers27 August 2026 — 5,842 subscribers30 August 2026 — 5,854 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 22 days, net +191. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,634–5,883 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 10:445,854+12
27 Aug 2026, 11:075,842+12
24 Aug 2026, 17:075,830+43
20 Aug 2026, 17:135,787+25
17 Aug 2026, 13:455,762+30
14 Aug 2026, 13:545,732+46
10 Aug 2026, 19:415,686+23
7 Aug 2026, 23:145,663no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:475,663first reading

Engagement

48 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.30%
avg views ÷ 5,854 subscribers
Avg views / post
311
48 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.222%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
48
of 48 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 48 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held48 (6 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total14,905
Reactions total7
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
31s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

7 reactions across 7 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 48 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 23:17 UTC144 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

---【💕基础信息】--- 时间:2026-08-12 老师:小欣 狼友:朴昌浩 ---【👙形象打分】--- 颜值:9 身材:9 态度:9 综合:9 ---【📝服务过程】--- 在工兵团换了一张猫窝100优惠券,优惠一张 每次约猫窝我感觉都是一波三折,从来没有正常过,本来约的周一,改成周二了,到地了说小欣还在化妆( ⌯' '⌯)💄 一想到女生化妆2小时,果断移步去旁边的库迪点了两杯咖啡,还得是潘帕斯品尝我的孤独 半个小时了一杯下肚,看了下飞机无消息,看来还得继续等,打开准备给小欣的第二杯,继续品尝孤独。终于皇天不负有心人,小猫回消息了,果断出门去往教学楼 见面小欣笑眯眯的打个招呼让做沙发,简单聊聊就去洗澡,出来发现小欣已经脱完了在门口拿着浴巾等我,瞟了一眼,细枝硕果,无敌! 小欣比较会蛇,比我厉害多了!舌头很灵活,我都抓不住。奶子很挺,而且感觉有c了。 小欣的口活比较一般,可能是昨天上面那两个比较会,有对比地原因。先是女上,小穴

11 Aug 2026, 15:38 UTC228 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

---【💕基础信息】--- 时间:2026-08-11 老师:点点 狼友:莫楚枫 ---【👙形象打分】--- 颜值:8 身材:8 态度:9.5 综合:8.5 ---【📝服务过程】--- 可爱性的妹子,人照八分,性格活泛聊个不停,广西妹子,皮肤光滑背上有些纹身,陪浴帮洗很精神,上床会抱着你任蛇,各种姿势要求都配合,日起来会叫比较大声很投入,前后二个姿势愉快出水,完事后还聊了半天,说自己无聊又不想出去天太热叭拉叭拉。 【优点】:嫩妹性格好可冲 【缺点/建议】:有些纹身不算白 【个人评价总结】:有日感会聊天出击感觉好 ❤️ 工兵团群友审美各不同,吾之蜜糖,彼之砒霜。不合适直接掉头。

1

11 Aug 2026, 11:46 UTC279 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

---【💕基础信息】--- 时间:2026-08-11 老师:童童 狼友:鸡腿堡Justice ---【👙形象打分】--- 颜值:8 身材:8 态度:8 综合:8 ---【📝服务过程】--- 只能当天约所以趁有空去了一趟,课室环境还行,就是刚开始有阿姨敲门吓我一跳😂进门就看见一个丰满的美女对我笑,正常黄皮,胸C左右,腰部少许赘肉,皮肤手感还行。妹子挺能聊的,说因为打农药所以开课时间不定。口活水平中规中矩,过程就不细表了,妹子很紧,基本不到十分钟就结束了。床上很配合,会配合节奏一起动。 【优点】:丰满,紧,态度不错 【缺点/建议】:有点赘肉 【个人评价总结】:喜欢丰满的无脑冲 ❤️ 工兵团群友审美各不同,吾之蜜糖,彼之砒霜。不合适直接掉头。

11 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTC263 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

---【💕基础信息】--- 时间:2026-08-11 老师:点点 狼友:许愿 ---【👙形象打分】--- 颜值:7.5 身材:8 态度:9.5 综合:8.33 ---【📝服务过程】--- 按指示提前十几分钟到达,妹子是05广西表妹,人照七分左右,胸b奈头性感,皮肤比看着好,摸着顺滑。有符文 不算多 也是陪浴完后转战床上,亲胸口活调情都还可以,然后吃奈奈摸下面,没一会儿就很湿润了,看妹子表情非常投入很爽的感觉询问后随即戴套插入。 进入后感觉不错,腰下垫个枕头,妹子说顶到底了,我问舒服嘛,妹子说很爽表情销魂很真实,于是加快速度,ls开始叫了起来,问ls最喜欢是什么姿势,随即换了后入(说喜欢顶到底的感觉),这当然得满足她啊,于是猛猛凿,后面又换回传教士,边🐍边做,最后手打出水。 为什么最后是手打,这就得提到我最讨厌的水多多了,中间其实有三四次来感觉了,最后都因为水多多又出不来,最后没办法手打,ls全程态度都挺好的。后

11 Aug 2026, 10:26 UTC264 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

---【💕基础信息】--- 时间:2026-08-11 老师:小欣 狼友:起风 ---【👙形象打分】--- 颜值:8.8 身材:8.8 态度:9 综合:8.87 ---【📝服务过程】--- 好久没去猫窝了,今天约到小欣,结果罚站了20多分钟,不过好在进去后心情好了许多。小欣性格挺好,挺爱笑的,进门闲聊一会就开始洗澡,望着大奶心痒难耐,忍不住就上手抚摸。比起呆呆来说唯一不足就是没有呆呆的白。洗后就跟着去了二楼,找漱口水没找到,算了,直接蛇,小欣好会啊,舌头猛攻,时不时还吸一下,这哪受的了。蛇完又亲胸,又是那一套,还真挺舒服,二弟反应强烈,于是小欣扶起它,一口吃掉,上下套弄,舌头还会舔,差点要交代了。赶忙让她住口,舒服的要升天了,趁势换我来服务一下,吃奶摸批好一会,就戴套准备女上,试试小欣深浅。不得不说,嫩妹就是紧,还烫,舒服的不想出来。女上好一会,小欣说不行了,于是换我正面进攻,进进出出好不快活,正面完事换后面,拍屁股,让小欣自己

11 Aug 2026, 08:21 UTC282 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

---【💕基础信息】--- 时间:2026-08-11 老师:小瑶 狼友:SW ---【👙形象打分】--- 颜值:9 身材:9 态度:10 综合:9.33 ---【📝服务过程】--- 小瑶老师休息后的头课,又捡漏了。驱车40公里来到目的地,在楼下等老师,迎面走来一个美女,确定暗号后,跟老师一起上楼,需要刷卡的酒店,挺安全了。先是和老师一起吃雪糕,蹭了根烟,聊聊天熟络了一下。聊挺好的,对于我这个I人很友好。接着就是交水费,一起共浴,老师也脱光光进来了,只见匀称健康的酮体展露无疑,二弟一下就起立了,胸B,很粉嫩,下面可以看着是黑森林。洗好后去二楼,小瑶宝宝好乖啊,先吻了一下,开始🐍,蛇的鸡儿梆硬,手也不安分的摸🐻和下面,摸到爱液流出后,开始口,无齿感,鸡儿梆硬后,立马提枪传教起手,小穴略紧,触电般爽感传满全身,开始抽插,淫水也月来越多,加快速度,也一直🐍,转而女上大战,歪日,妥妥技术性嫩妹,这腰无敌了,看着交合处和美胸,顶级享受,小

11 Aug 2026, 08:16 UTC279 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

---【💕基础信息】--- 时间:2026-08-11 老师:小情 狼友:秋 ---【👙形象打分】--- 颜值:9 身材:8 态度:8 综合:8.33 ---【📝服务过程】--- 在上周五就约了许多大V好评的qm小情,到这周一势必要尝尝咸淡。科室位置较为偏僻,小区公寓,安全性一般,第一次见到loft的科室,还是挺新奇的体验。刚进入科室后,就看到妹妹小小一只。科室环境收拾的一般,问妹妹一起洗澡,妹妹说洗过了,于是自己去淋浴间冲洗了。洗完过后寒暄了一下便上了loft二楼开始战斗,妹妹先是进行口活,口活挺好的很舒服。然后便是戴套女上,又尝试了后入和传教两种动作。课表上写着有🐍,但实际上只能亲亲,做一半的时候妹妹略显痛苦。我问妹妹怎么了,妹妹说上一个客人比较持久给她桩痛了状态不好,看着妹妹太难受了,我也不忍心,就提出手打后手打出来了。 总体来说,小情是挺能激起人的保护欲的那种的,就像妹妹一样,颜值过关,如果服务方面能更进一步就更好了

1

10 Aug 2026, 17:45 UTC361 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

---【💕基础信息】--- 时间:2026-08-11 老师:愉悦私影 狼友:huhutianyou ---【👙形象打分】--- 颜值:9 身材:8 态度:10 综合:9 ---【📝服务过程】--- 刚从杭州回来,体验了mmk的高质量妹妹,回武汉想继续这种享受,所以今天去约了愉悦私影。晚上6点半到的,南湖店。一进去,客服态度很好,把所有今天出勤的妹妹叫过来了,颜值都不错,奶子大的不少,但是突然间右手边第一个妹子,冲我笑了一下,以我多年出去玩的经验,女孩子只要笑一般态度都很好,而且颜值也不错,我就果断点了她。随后妹子出去,客服问我什么套餐,我第一次玩不熟悉,先来个399看看态度。接着妹妹一进来先把灯光调暗,搞足气氛,问我看什么电影。我当然要选鬼片吓吓她了,她也很笨笨的,真的很怕鬼片,缩在我怀里,顿时激发我的保护欲,顺势搂住她,都说楚王好细腰,她肯定是湖北人,腰盈盈一握,皮肤吹弹可破,滑手的很,手感一级棒。接着就唇轻点她的脸颊,一顿

10 Aug 2026, 17:44 UTC346 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

---【💕基础信息】--- 时间:2026-08-11 老师:童童 狼友:秦 ---【👙形象打分】--- 颜值:7 身材:7 态度:9 综合:7.67 ---【📝服务过程】--- 开门一看一股活力感,人照嘛亮度调的偏高,简单陪浴,过程中,时不时会蹦出一句俏皮话暖场,性格幽默,情绪价值提供的很到位。口时盯着她看时,她还会害羞,让我看天花板,来这儿不就是冲她嘛,哪里没有天花板看。非常听从指挥,可惜最近天天熬夜,二弟不争气还被取笑,羞愧逃离。 【优点】:任盘,前提扛得住,情绪价值给的足足的 【缺点/建议】:皮肤偏黄黑,上课工具不齐全 【个人评价总结】:一个网瘾少女,不月课,可以约游戏。被嘲笑了决定暂时闭关修炼,待日后洗刷耻辱 ❤️ 工兵团群友审美各不同,吾之蜜糖,彼之砒霜。不合适直接掉头。

1

10 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC400 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

---【💕基础信息】--- 时间:2026-08-10 老师:锦鲤 狼友:1然 ---【👙形象打分】--- 颜值:8 身材:8 态度:8 综合:8 ---【📝服务过程】--- 约了下午的课 太久没做了 想感觉出出水就来了 没想到还走错小区了qwq 然后就返回就进门了 然后开始帮我现在 然后就开始做服务 然后因为太久没做就被秒了😔 【优点】:就是活👌🏻 【缺点/建议】:没啥 【个人评价总结】:房间挺好的好找挺好的 ❤️ 工兵团群友审美各不同,吾之蜜糖,彼之砒霜。不合适直接掉头。

1

10 Aug 2026, 04:42 UTC404 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

---【💕基础信息】--- 时间:2026-08-10 老师:锦鲤 狼友:一夜七次郎 ---【👙形象打分】--- 颜值:8 身材:8 态度:9 综合:8.33 ---【📝服务过程】--- 总体来说老师服务特别好,口活,和下面做起来非常舒服,在老师这里有两关,第一关口吹,一般人都过不了这一关,第二关下面会夹你!建议PP来闯两关!哈哈!身材特别棒!下次继续来😃 【优点】:口活是真好 【缺点/建议】:下面夹你的时候有点痛,太紧了 【个人评价总结】:总的来说,值得推荐, ❤️ 工兵团群友审美各不同,吾之蜜糖,彼之砒霜。不合适直接掉头。

10 Aug 2026, 04:04 UTC380 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

---【💕基础信息】--- 时间:2026-08-10 老师:愉悦私影 狼友:窄门 ---【👙形象打分】--- 颜值:10 身材:9.5 态度:10 综合:9.83 ---【📝服务过程】--- 第一次想尝试私影,看了猪猪前辈频道选了辣个女人。选的尺度最小的可以摸摸奶,不过颜值和身材都没的说,而且还怪有缘,看猪猪频道出击没毛,辣个女人无敌,就是平时钟有点难排到,这次运气不错。 【优点】:主动会聊天有共同爱好 【缺点/建议】:比较适合喜欢从聊天钟获得情绪价值的 【个人评价总结】:无敌 ❤️ 工兵团群友审美各不同,吾之蜜糖,彼之砒霜。不合适直接掉头。

Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @WHGBPORT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,212,403 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“武汉工兵团|报告榜” (@WHGBPORT), 5,854 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WHGBPORT.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.