Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ESQUISSER.

Channel

ESQUISSER.

@WERTHSS

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

173subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002513562672
TypeChannel
Username@WERTHSS
Created14 March 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/WERTHSS

Growth

173174173.57 August 2026 — 174 subscribers8 August 2026 — 174 subscribers22 August 2026 — 173 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 15 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 173–174 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 16:44173-1
8 Aug 2026, 14:02174no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:21174first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 14 March 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
74
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 10 we hold a reading for · 60%
Most on one post
35
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @WERTHSS. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 March 2025 to 23 March 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

23 Mar 2025, 06:11 UTC≈2,260 views0 reactions10 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

even if you know that you don't даже если 😘🤨 знаешь, что ты этого не делаешь. own me, I'll let you play the role Владей мной, я 😌😌🤣😄😌😇😎 тебе.сыграть эту роль. I'll be your animal. я буду 😘😄😌🥲🙂животным.

18 Mar 2025, 10:07 UTC≈1,940 views0 reactions7 Starsread 8 August 2026

вы ахуели.я че,на раба похож.

18 Mar 2025, 09:21 UTC≈1,950 views0 reactions7 Starsread 8 August 2026
Poll

заход второй,меньше дозы.почему ты,да именно ты,взял бы у дориана в ротик.🥷

  1. дориан великолепен.🐇6%
  2. меня мама в детстве била.🐇24%
  3. я люблю дориана.🐇6%
  4. дориан у меня между ножек.🐇65%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

18 Mar 2025, 07:10 UTC≈1,730 views0 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026

твои булочки орех,так и просятся на грех,вниз и вверх.

17 Mar 2025, 07:58 UTC≈2,120 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

🌟

  1. дорианчики.🐍39%
  2. миньены.🐇21%
  3. милые. 🎀7%
  4. дорогие. (в прямом смысле.) ☝️17%
  5. малыши.🦥16%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Mar 2025, 02:33 UTC≈2,590 views0 reactions10 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

𝐁𝐈𝐋𝐋𝐈𝐄 𝐄𝐈𝐋𝐈𝐒𝐇.🤩 " baby,i think you were made for me. somebody write down the recipe. been tryin' hard not to overeat. you're just so sweet. " wlw.

15 Mar 2025, 01:47 UTC≈2,400 views0 reactions35 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

𝐁𝐋𝐎𝐆 - 𝐄𝐒𝐓𝐇𝐄𝐓. music and aesthetics.🎀 || "ESQUISSER." 𝘖𝘞𝘕𝘌𝘙: 𝐃𝐎𝐑𝐈𝐀𝐍 - 47в.л. - (𝙪𝙣𝙞-𝙗𝙞)⛺️ связь / помощь каналу. anon.🌵 || голоса.👅 music and aesthetics. 🤔the weekend | билли каспийский груз | леди гага и другие. ------------------------------------------------ - я могла бы съесть эту девушку на обед. да,она танцует у меня на языке. 💃патент на - эскиз/набросок "ESQUISSER." если замечу блог/эст

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @WERTHSS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Mar 2025, 09:21 UTCAnonymous Poll280 voters

заход второй,меньше дозы.почему ты,да именно ты,взял бы у дориана в ротик.🥷

  1. дориан великолепен.🐇6%
  2. меня мама в детстве била.🐇24%
  3. я люблю дориана.🐇6%
  4. дориан у меня между ножек.🐇65%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Mar 2025, 07:58 UTCAnonymous Poll217 voters

🌟

  1. дорианчики.🐍39%
  2. миньены.🐇21%
  3. милые. 🎀7%
  4. дорогие. (в прямом смысле.) ☝️17%
  5. малыши.🦥16%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 14 March 2025 to 23 March 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ESQUISSER.” (@WERTHSS), 173 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WERTHSS.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.