Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SOMALI LINK TELEGRAM

Channel

SOMALI LINK TELEGRAM

@WASMOSOMALIVIP4

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

38,184subscribers

+9,926 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003370113821
TypeChannel
Username@WASMOSOMALIVIP4
DescriptionWASMO SOMALI Somali link telegram wasmo telegram link 2026 vip somali nudge link wasmo somali nudge wasmo
Created17 November 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/WASMOSOMALIVIP4

Topic

Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

99,500 average views per post against 38,184 subscribers — an engagement rate of 260.7%. Across the 24,206 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,624–99,995 subscribers — the middle half sit between 2.72% and 15.4%, with a median of 6.97%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (31 July 2026 30 August 2026)
Posts measured24 of 24 published in the window (0 exact, 24 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled2,388,680
Mature posts only292.4% over 21 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers38,184 measured 30 August 2026
Cohortb31623 · 24,206 channels · p10 0.881% · p25 2.72% · p50 6.97% · p75 15.4% · p90 28.1%
Position in cohort99.975th percentile · 37.4× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.087% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 30 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

28,25838,18433,2217 August 2026 — 28,258 subscribers8 August 2026 — 30,229 subscribers9 August 2026 — 31,280 subscribers10 August 2026 — 32,037 subscribers11 August 2026 — 32,534 subscribers12 August 2026 — 32,839 subscribers13 August 2026 — 33,141 subscribers14 August 2026 — 33,478 subscribers16 August 2026 — 33,955 subscribers17 August 2026 — 34,170 subscribers18 August 2026 — 34,510 subscribers19 August 2026 — 35,104 subscribers20 August 2026 — 35,557 subscribers21 August 2026 — 35,892 subscribers22 August 2026 — 36,260 subscribers24 August 2026 — 36,722 subscribers25 August 2026 — 36,824 subscribers26 August 2026 — 36,884 subscribers27 August 2026 — 37,406 subscribers28 August 2026 — 37,729 subscribers29 August 2026 — 38,031 subscribers30 August 2026 — 38,184 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
22 measurements spanning 23 days, net +9,926. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,769–39,673 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 14:1338,184+153
29 Aug 2026, 13:1338,031+302
28 Aug 2026, 11:1337,729+323
27 Aug 2026, 08:1437,406+522
26 Aug 2026, 08:0436,884+60
25 Aug 2026, 07:4536,824+102
24 Aug 2026, 06:5236,722+462
22 Aug 2026, 15:0836,260+368
21 Aug 2026, 08:5435,892+335
20 Aug 2026, 10:2535,557+453
19 Aug 2026, 11:5435,104+594
18 Aug 2026, 15:2534,510+340
17 Aug 2026, 17:4834,170+215
16 Aug 2026, 15:5833,955+477
14 Aug 2026, 20:5933,478+337
13 Aug 2026, 11:5933,141+302
12 Aug 2026, 08:4332,839+305
11 Aug 2026, 07:0532,534+497
10 Aug 2026, 06:4632,037+757
9 Aug 2026, 10:0131,280first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 17 November 2025the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 51 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
263.5%
avg views ÷ 38,184 subscribers
Avg views / post
101,000
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.338%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held25 (17 November 202529 August 2026)
Views total2,414,880
Reactions total8,167
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Aug 2026, 17:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Links
4

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

8,167 reactions across 24 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4,06149.7%
👎84610.4%
👍8129.94%
😁5626.88%
🔥4795.87%
👏3794.64%
🥰3374.13%
1491.82%
💯901.10%
🍌760.931%
👨‍💻730.894%
💔560.686%
💩540.661%
🆒370.453%
👌370.453%
340.416%
🫡170.208%
❤‍🔥130.159%
🌚80.098%
🍾80.098%
8 further kinds390.478%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,167reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 17 November 2025 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 05:17 UTC≈24,600 views127 reactionsread 30 August 2026

🚨Ma rabtaa inaa Daawato Wasmo Somali full videos ah? Link ga Hoose Waxaad Ka Heleysaa 3000 oo videos ah Update Ah Nooc walba Somalia ayaa Kujiro Hada Rukumo Sii aad uhesho Muuqalada Joogtada ah ✅✅✅✅👑👑🤩 https://t.me/+bGcsJ2G_MK9lMDM0

127

27 Aug 2026, 13:30 UTC≈52,100 views64 reactionsread 30 August 2026

🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ https://reffpa.com/L?tag=d_2005981m_1573c_&site=2005981&ad=1573

64

26 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC≈70,300 views398 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Poll

MAXAA JECLAAN LAHAYD INAA SOO DHIGO QOLKA

  1. WASMO SOMALI57%
  2. QARXISKA DADKA CAAN AH60%
  3. QARXIS CAADI AH45%
  4. SAY WLHI42%

The shares total 204%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

398

26 Aug 2026, 00:18 UTC≈72,700 views87 reactionsread 30 August 2026

🤩🤩🤩🆓 https://t.me/+vqzAYilBFbIzZTg0 https://t.me/+vqzAYilBFbIzZTg0 https://t.me/+vqzAYilBFbIzZTg0

87

24 Aug 2026, 08:52 UTC≈98,100 views106 reactionsread 30 August 2026

https://t.me/+_fV-dlJrA7UwYzY0 https://t.me/+_fV-dlJrA7UwYzY0 https://t.me/+_fV-dlJrA7UwYzY0

106

21 Aug 2026, 09:20 UTC≈127,000 views381 reactionsread 28 August 2026

https://t.me/wasmoqarxis1

205😁37👏36👎34🔥33👍14🥰14🖕8

21 Aug 2026, 00:55 UTC≈125,000 views446 reactionsread 27 August 2026

Ma Dooneysaa In Aad Daawato Qarxiska Maryan axmedeey Oo dhameestiran ka Daawo Link ga Hoose 🔠🔠🔠 https://t.me/+uVDvIy0YruQwMjNk

213👍67👎42🔥42😁41🥰18👏15🍾8

20 Aug 2026, 09:41 UTC≈6,680 views33 reactionsread 20 August 2026

https://wa.me/252616893228 Fatxi ayaa ladhahaa sharmuuto waaye

18👍8🔥6👎1

18 Aug 2026, 22:36 UTC≈145,000 views465 reactionsread 25 August 2026

https://t.me/Wasmosomalivip5

192👎95👍90🔥88

18 Aug 2026, 07:09 UTC≈157,000 views721 reactionsread 25 August 2026

Muuqaalka maryan ahmedeey ma aragtay muuqaalka dhameestiran ka daawo link hoose Hada Soo Daawo subscribe saaro 🔽🔽🔽🔽🔽🔽🔽🔽 https://t.me/+y8BNgus8mtdhZGY0

314👎124👍71😁70👏69🔥26🥰24💩23

18 Aug 2026, 05:35 UTC≈67,900 views69 reactionsread 20 August 2026

https://t.me/Hindiafsomalicusub2027

61👏5🥴2👍1

17 Aug 2026, 02:38 UTC≈144,000 views491 reactionsread 23 August 2026

Subax Wanaagsan aqyaarta meesha kujirto.. ❤

205👍83👏54🔥46😁44💩31👎28

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @WASMOSOMALIVIP4. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@WASMOSOMALIVIP4 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
28 August 2026
Most recent edit
28 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

26 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTCAnonymous Poll3,370 voters approx.

MAXAA JECLAAN LAHAYD INAA SOO DHIGO QOLKA

  1. WASMO SOMALI57%
  2. QARXISKA DADKA CAAN AH60%
  3. QARXIS CAADI AH45%
  4. SAY WLHI42%

The shares total 204%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 17 November 2025 to 29 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 143,048 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SOMALI LINK TELEGRAM” (@WASMOSOMALIVIP4), 38,184 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WASMOSOMALIVIP4.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.