Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝒲𝗔𝗡𝘕𝘈:𝖡´

Channel

𝒲𝗔𝗡𝘕𝘈:𝖡´

@WANNABOI

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

186subscribers

+11 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003645859158
TypeChannel
Username@WANNABOI
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/WANNABOI

Growth

175186180.59 August 2026 — 175 subscribers9 August 2026 — 175 subscribers17 August 2026 — 186 subscribers9 August 202617 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 173–188 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 14:07186+11
9 Aug 2026, 18:00175no change
9 Aug 2026, 17:48175first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
88.8%
avg views ÷ 186 subscribers
Avg views / post
165
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held17 (27 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total2,809
Reactions total248
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 04s
Average length
1m 21s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

248 reactions across 14 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52628458040155508563915.7%
custom 53167752000905176773212.9%
custom 53142498967594243732911.7%
custom 5325708143655685239228.87%
228.87%
custom 5240039695177512967208.06%
custom 5424833489176392720208.06%
custom 5276190314648854845187.26%
🎄156.05%
🍾114.44%
🕊104.03%
custom 531428209612924221593.63%
👍10.403%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 248reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 07:54 UTC87 views19 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

- посмотрите какую вайбовую работу нам сделала подписчица!!💰 в который раз убеждаемся, что наши биваны–талант!

custom 52628458040155508565custom 53142498967594243735custom 54248334891763927205🍾1🎄1custom 52400396951775129671custom 53167752000905176771

31 Jul 2026, 08:40 UTC186 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

warning: громкость и спойлеры

🍾2🎄1

31 Jul 2026, 08:40 UTC164 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

custom 52400396951775129676custom 53167752000905176775custom 53257081436556852393🍾1

30 Jul 2026, 08:59 UTC177 views29 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

11custom 52628458040155508569custom 52761903146488548457custom 53167752000905176772

29 Jul 2026, 08:30 UTC194 views23 reactionsread 9 August 2026
File

🌸´𝒲𝗔𝗡𝘕𝘈:𝖡 & 𝘛𝘏𝘌 𝘚𝘏𝘐𝘛 🎀 wanna get me? you wish … 💚 НОВЫЕ ПРАКТИКИ ОТ ЛИКСИ, НАБИ И СУЁН!!🥛 Напишите как вам комментариях!! liksy - look alive 🎁 nabi - monster 🎀 sooyoung - stateside 𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑠 : #WANNAB #SOLOS

custom 52628458040155508568custom 53142820961292422155custom 52400396951775129674custom 54248334891763927203custom 53257081436556852392custom 53167752000905176771

28 Jul 2026, 20:07 UTC169 views39 reactionsread 9 August 2026

РЕБЯТА ЛЯНЬТЕ КАКИЕ У НАС РЕАКЦИИ КЛАССНЫЕ

custom 526284580401555085613custom 52400396951775129679custom 52761903146488548458custom 53142820961292422154custom 531424989675942437321custom 53167752000905176771custom 53257081436556852391

28 Jul 2026, 14:18 UTC172 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

На этом всё, всем спасибо, кто поучаствовал!! 🥛 биваны, любим вас🫶🏻

custom 52628458040155508564custom 52761903146488548451

28 Jul 2026, 14:16 UTC169 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Poll

Как часто вы бы появлялись в чате?

  1. • каждый день кнш81%
  2. • как повезёт12%
  3. • раз в неделю0%
  4. • нафиг этот чат ваще7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 53167752000905176775custom 54248334891763927205custom 53257081436556852393custom 53142498967594243732custom 52761903146488548451

28 Jul 2026, 12:49 UTC160 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Poll

Что бы ты делала для группы?

  1. • монтаж41%
  2. • оформление34%
  3. • текстовая42%
  4. • пиар39%
  5. • сводка19%

The shares total 175%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🍾1

28 Jul 2026, 12:26 UTC160 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Poll

Твой первый кавер в ВАННАБИ…

  1. • от766%
  2. • юнитный10%
  3. • соло15%
  4. • дуо ( в коммах с кем )18%

The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

3🍾3🕊3custom 54248334891763927202🎄1custom 53167752000905176771

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @WANNABOI. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Jul 2026, 14:16 UTCAnonymous Poll58 voters

Как часто вы бы появлялись в чате?

  1. • каждый день кнш81%
  2. • как повезёт12%
  3. • раз в неделю0%
  4. • нафиг этот чат ваще7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Jul 2026, 12:49 UTCAnonymous Poll64 voters

Что бы ты делала для группы?

  1. • монтаж41%
  2. • оформление34%
  3. • текстовая42%
  4. • пиар39%
  5. • сводка19%

The shares total 175%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

28 Jul 2026, 12:26 UTCAnonymous Poll68 voters

Твой первый кавер в ВАННАБИ…

  1. • от766%
  2. • юнитный10%
  3. • соло15%
  4. • дуо ( в коммах с кем )18%

The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

28 Jul 2026, 12:14 UTCAnonymous Poll71 voters

Какую позицию ты бы заняла?❤️

  1. • макнэ37%
  2. • гл вокалист21%
  3. • гл рэпер27%
  4. • онни10%
  5. • вед вокал34%
  6. • вед рэппер41%

The shares total 170%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

28 Jul 2026, 12:12 UTCAnonymous Poll69 voters

Кто бы был первым, с кем ты познакомилась? ❤️

  1. • Ликси46%
  2. • Нина38%
  3. • Нари17%
  4. • Суён25%
  5. • Софа26%
  6. • Наби35%

The shares total 187%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 565,031 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝒲𝗔𝗡𝘕𝘈:𝖡´” (@WANNABOI), 186 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WANNABOI.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.