Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

68.0.90

@W68U90

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,050subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002220370075
TypeChannel
Username@W68U90
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/W68U90

Growth

3,0503,0523,05111 Aug 2026, 03:47 — 3,052 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 08:42 — 3,050 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 03:4711 Aug 2026, 08:42
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,050–3,052 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 08:423,050-2
11 Aug 2026, 03:473,052first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 13 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
24s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5,886 reactions across 9 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4,04368.7%
🔥4948.39%
❤‍🔥4607.82%
🍓1963.33%
😭1342.28%
😢1242.11%
🙏1141.94%
💘871.48%
🥰510.866%
🤔390.663%
💋250.425%
😍230.391%
160.272%
🍾120.204%
🎉110.187%
🌭100.17%
💊70.119%
🎄60.102%
👍40.068%
👌30.051%
11 further kinds270.459%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,886reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 13 October 2025 to 10 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
33
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 9 we hold a reading for · 67%
Most on one post
17
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @W68U90. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 October 2025 to 10 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Jan 2026, 06:45 UTC≈5,780 views561 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026

Наверху почему то не открываются комментарии, странная фигня😱

380😭109🤔3912🍓7💘5💋3😢3

10 Jan 2026, 06:21 UTC≈6,050 views827 reactions9 Starsread 11 August 2026
Video

Айм олвейс комбек #анимация

605🍓112🔥69❤‍🔥19💋8💘8🌭21

31 Dec 2025, 19:40 UTC≈7,080 views474 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Ну вот пора встречать новый год. Время пролетело неуловимо, по ощущениям совсем недавно был 2024. Желаю вам побольше отдыха, свободного времени и самое главное - меньше проблем. Увидимся уже в январе, успехов!🩸

363🥰43❤‍🔥36🔥10🍾6🎄6🎉42

14 Dec 2025, 08:16 UTC≈8,160 views796 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @jdh_is_the_twinkPhoto

Здравствуйте, ничтожные, нищие смертные, мои верные последователи

583❤‍🔥103🔥60😍23🍓10💘4💋3🤓3

22 Nov 2025, 17:30 UTC≈9,240 views698 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Ухожу в долгий рест, что-то вообще ничего делать не хочется. Экзамены давят прям сильно🥺 #щп

464😢121🍓53😭25💘11🙏7🔥6🌭4

23 Oct 2025, 17:16 UTC≈10,000 views349 reactions3 Starsread 11 August 2026

Спасибо большое за поздравления и звёздочки!😎

🔥25758❤‍🔥28💘3🥴3

23 Oct 2025, 17:15 UTC≈8,420 views342 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @MarshalllyPhoto

С ДНЁМ РОЖДЕНИЯ МОЮ ЛЮБИМУЮ БЕСТИИ❤️❤️❤️❤️

266❤‍🔥44💘29🔥3

23 Oct 2025, 04:05 UTC≈18,800 views924 reactions17 Starsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Йоооу сегодня мой ❤❤🤩 😍 Мне исполняется совсем уже мало лет, типа 17 Практически год назад был старт этого канала, мне ооооочень сильно хотелось вложить небольшую частичку в фандом и надеюсь это получилось. Очень рада, что за все время увидела много крутых ребят, которые вдохновляли и поддерживали своим творчеством. Спасибо, что остаётесь здесь🤩  И ну как же без просьбы на репостик🤩

663❤‍🔥140🔥82💘10🎉7🍾6🥰5🌭3

13 Oct 2025, 07:09 UTC≈9,270 views915 reactions2 Starsread 11 August 2026
Video

Пошла по американским трендам 🤩 #лолофд #анимация

661🙏107❤‍🔥89💘17🍓11💋11🔥6💊5

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @W68U90. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,227,196 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“68.0.90” (@W68U90), 3,050 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/W68U90.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.