Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

21.Vus

@Vus021

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,588subscribers

-16 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002242985179
TypeChannel
Username@Vus021
CreatedBetween 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Vus021

Growth

6,5886,6046,59610 August 2026 — 6,604 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,604 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,602 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,588 subscribers10 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 3 days, net -16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,586–6,606 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 01:476,588-14
10 Aug 2026, 12:256,602-2
10 Aug 2026, 09:456,604no change
10 Aug 2026, 09:326,604first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
34.0%
avg views ÷ 6,588 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,240
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.62%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held10 (30 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total22,420
Reactions total326
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 02:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
36s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

326 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
23170.9%
custom 52513057422872717354513.8%
custom 5400311579558306712216.44%
custom 5330283065509953435113.37%
custom 525159291668558507992.76%
custom 540026850533129580392.76%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 326reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 15:40 UTC≈1,450 views62 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @etoznakmag

Нам всегда тяжелее всего перед самыми прекрасными переменами в жизни.

33custom 525130574228727173520custom 52515929166855850797custom 54002685053312958032

5 Aug 2026, 18:17 UTC≈2,280 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

5 лет не изменяю Лейле 🩵 Никогда не навяжет вам то, что не нужно, что по возрасту не подходит, Сегодня кололи ДНК лосося, готовим кожу к профилактике на аппарате морфиус Знаете, я так счастлива, что у меня нет филлеровой зависимости 2 года не трогаю губы, не делаю ничего, хотя иногда хочется сделать углы, но как только худею все приходит в норму))

25custom 54002685053312958032custom 52515929166855850791

4 Aug 2026, 19:09 UTC≈2,100 views38 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

16custom 533028306550995343511custom 52513057422872717358custom 54003115795583067123

3 Aug 2026, 18:54 UTC≈2,200 views27 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Вернулась в Москву 🩵

27

3 Aug 2026, 18:52 UTC≈2,290 viewsread 12 August 2026
File

🎧 Нажми, чтобы найти песню

31 Jul 2026, 15:48 UTC≈2,670 views77 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Редко, но метко могу сделать проф макияж 💄 Как вам?

44custom 540031157955830671218custom 525130574228727173515

31 Jul 2026, 12:18 UTC≈2,260 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

22

31 Jul 2026, 04:06 UTC≈2,290 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

✈️ утро. Дорога. Аэропорт

28

30 Jul 2026, 22:31 UTC≈2,380 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Раз в месяц нужно отдыхать головой В моем любимом салоне Haidi С 1 по 8 августа При записи на японское спа от Nashi Миниатюрки и напиток в подарок 🎁

12custom 54002685053312958035custom 52513057422872717352custom 52515929166855850791

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @Vus021. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 977,708 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“21.Vus” (@Vus021), 6,588 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Vus021.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.