Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Клуб Восток

@VostokClub

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,625subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002030170830
TypeChannel
Username@VostokClub
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/VostokClub

Growth

1,6251,6311,6286 August 2026 — 1,631 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,631 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,628 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,625 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,624–1,632 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 07:271,625-3
9 Aug 2026, 22:311,628-3
6 Aug 2026, 11:351,631no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:051,631first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.24%
avg views ÷ 1,625 subscribers
Avg views / post
52.6
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held10 (17 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total526
Reactions total28
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

28 reactions across 6 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
828.6%
🔥828.6%
👏310.7%
💯310.7%
🤗310.7%
👌27.14%
👍13.57%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 10:22 UTC20 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @maydecree

🤖 Концентрация технологической власти, разрыв между заявлениями и их реализацией, а также фрагментация управления являются главными проблемами искусственного интеллекта. Об этом заявил ТАСС генеральный директор фонда «Природа и люди» Сергей Рыбаков: — Первой проблемой является концентрация технологической власти. Передовые чипы, облака, базовые модели, данные и капитал контролируются ограниченным кругом стран и комп

7 Aug 2026, 10:10 UTC22 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @radionovasgPhoto

Экологические некоммерческие организации: рейтинг лучших 🟢 На заседании Общественного совета при Росприроднадзоре был представлен второй рейтинг ведущих природоохранных некоммерческих организаций России. В исследовании, подготовленном экспертами Высшей школы экономики, приняли участие около 200 наиболее активных экологических организаций, а в итоговый рейтинг вошли 24 НКО. При оценке учитывались финансовая устойчив

6 Aug 2026, 09:36 UTC36 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @naturepeople_ruPhoto

«Искусственный интеллект может стать мощным инструментом для защиты природы — но только если развивать его ответственно и сообща». Вчера в Грозном генеральный директор Фонда «Природа и люди» Сергей Рыбаков выступил на Форуме наилучших практик борьбы с опустыниванием и деградацией земель, который проходит в преддверии 17-й сессии Конференции Сторон Конвенции ООН по борьбе с опустыниванием. На Форуме собрались предст

2

6 Aug 2026, 08:41 UTC26 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @russiauniversitiesPhoto

В Грозном проходит Форум наилучших практик борьбы с опустыниванием и деградацией земель 5–7 августа на площадке Чеченского государственного университета им. А.А. Кадырова @chesuofficial федеральные ведомства, РАН, ведущие университеты, природоохранные организации и крупнейшие компании обсуждают мониторинг состояния земель, восстановление деградированных почв, защитное лесоразведение и устойчивость сельских территори

2👌1👏1

24 Jul 2026, 16:49 UTC83 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @maydecreePhoto

Главным политическим итогом Всемирной конференции по искусственному интеллекту в Шанхае стало подписание соглашения о создании Всемирной организации по сотрудничеству в сфере искусственного интеллекта (WAICO). Документ первоначально подписали 29 государств, включая Российскую Федерацию. WAICO названа первой межправительственной международной структурой, деятельность которой специально посвящена теме ИИ. Штаб-квартира

🔥5💯2🤗2

24 Jul 2026, 14:32 UTC66 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @naturepeople_ru

Об итогах Всемирной конференции по искусственному интеллекту, состоявшейся в в Шанхае, «Комсомольской правде» рассказал Сергей Рыбаков, генеральный директор фонда «Природа и люди» 📰 ❤️ Узнайте, как помочь природе: фонд «Природа и люди»

23 Jul 2026, 09:26 UTC74 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @utilizatoryPhoto

28 июля в 10.00 в международном пресс-центре медиагруппы «Россия сегодня» пройдёт круглый стол на тему «Цифровой контур РОП: инновационные подходы в контроле и оценке для развития экономики замкнутого цикла». Прямая трансляция будет доступна здесь. Спикеры — первый заместитель министра природных ресурсов и экологии РФ Джамбулат Хатуов, заместитель министра промышленности и торговли РФ Алексей Матушанский, руководите

20 Jul 2026, 14:39 UTC72 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @naturepeople_ruPhoto

18 июля в Шанхае на площадке Фуданьского университета состоялся Международный симпозиум, посвящённый Искусственному интеллекту и окружающей среде. Участие в глобальном диалоге приняли представители Китая, России и Индии. На мероприятии от российской стороны выступили Александр Алимов, заместитель Министра иностранных дел Российской Федерации, а также Сергей Рыбаков, генеральный директор фонда «Природа и люди». В св

🔥2👌1

18 Jul 2026, 13:11 UTC59 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @russiauniversitiesPhoto

Как доверие влияет на экономику и зачем нужен цифровой рубль ❓ Почему доверие считается основой экономического развития? Стоит ли вкладываться в криптовалюту? И зачем России нужен цифровой рубль? Об этом говорили в эфире программы «Время науки» на радио «Комсомольская правда» — вместе с академиком РАН, научным руководителем НЦФМ Александром Сергеевым, академиком РАН, президентом Ассоциации российских банков, профес

👍1👏1🤗1

17 Jul 2026, 14:18 UTC68 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @naturepeople_ruPhoto

На Всемирной конференции по искусственному интеллекту WAIC 2026 (World Artificial Intelligence Conference) в Шанхае — одной из крупнейших мировых площадок, посвящённых развитию искусственного интеллекта, — в рамках международного Win-Win BRICS Forum был представлен экспертный доклад White Paper on: AI and Environment («Искусственный интеллект и окружающая среда»), подготовленный фондом «Природа и люди», Фуданьским ун

4👏1💯1🔥1

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @VostokClub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 470,080 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Клуб Восток” (@VostokClub), 1,625 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VostokClub.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.