Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Vorteks FT

@VorteksFT

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

513subscribers

+46 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003781551179
TypeChannel
Username@VorteksFT
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/VorteksFT

Growth

4675134906 August 2026 — 467 subscribers6 August 2026 — 470 subscribers15 August 2026 — 513 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +46. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 460–520 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 01:17513+43
6 Aug 2026, 22:46470+3
6 Aug 2026, 21:32467first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
76.8%
avg views ÷ 513 subscribers
Avg views / post
394
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.95%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (23 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total7,490
Reactions total155
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 21:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

155 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52808567923210063487347.1%
custom 52760302583976205463522.6%
custom 52761666837388099241711.0%
custom 5276155362205016006106.45%
custom 5276468770263573892106.45%
custom 542950052089928948595.81%
custom 536637236143826874410.645%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 155reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
161
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 19 we hold a reading for · 21%
Most on one post
157
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @VorteksFT. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 12:56 UTC154 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Прикольно я базы искал

custom 52761666837388099244

6 Aug 2026, 05:25 UTC184 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Открываем новую мини рубрику в канале Задаю вопросы день 1/10 Какой твой любимый свап?

custom 52760302583976205461custom 52808567923210063481

5 Aug 2026, 16:58 UTC208 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

😊😊😊😊😊 1️ -1738 67 1739 2️⃣ 1128 73 2061 3️⃣ -1688 65 -1961 4️⃣ -1270 73 -1603 5️⃣ -1314 66 -1713 6️⃣ -1244 70 -1460 7️⃣ 1501 72 1518 8️⃣ 1720 76 -2250 an109

custom 52808567923210063482

1 Aug 2026, 06:27 UTCviews —

Vorteks FT pinned «😊😊😊😊😊😊😊 😊😊 😊😊😊😊😊 😊😊😊😊😊 1️⃣➖ 2 Донат кейса ⭐️ 2️⃣➖5️⃣ Донат кейс ⭐️ 6️⃣➖1️⃣0️⃣ токен кейс⭐️ 😊😊😊😊😊😊😊 😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊 @VorteksFT 😊😊😊😊😊 0️⃣7️⃣🔤0️⃣8️⃣ 1️⃣4️⃣🔤0️⃣0️⃣ Не забывай, пересыл кенту и буст каналу увеличивают шансы на победу! Удачи!»

1 Aug 2026, 06:26 UTC380 views0 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

Ну будет у меня больше второго админа, мне из-за нее конкурс снесли 😔 Вообще, денег мало надо хотя бы 500 сабов добить Порекомендуйте в лс у кого могу купить

31 Jul 2026, 15:26 UTC407 viewsread 6 August 2026

😊😊😊😊😊 1️⃣ 1243 69 1552 2️⃣ 1363 87 2174 3️⃣ 1359 70 2000 4️⃣ -1900 65 -1900 5️⃣ -1060 78 2287 6️⃣ -1221 72 2300 7️⃣ -1043 75 1583 8️⃣ -500 ? -703 9️⃣ -250 70 -614 1️⃣0️⃣ 218 40 850 1- клады могут лежать в незере 2- клады могут быть с рг 3- клады могут охраняться An109

30 Jul 2026, 11:00 UTC≈1,340 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026

😊😊😊😊😊😊😊 😊😊 😊😊😊😊😊 😊😊😊😊😊 1️⃣➖ 2 Донат кейса ⭐️ 2️⃣➖5️⃣ Донат кейс ⭐️ 6️⃣➖1️⃣0️⃣ токен кейс⭐️ 😊😊😊😊😊😊😊 😊😊😊😊😊😊😊😊 @VorteksFT 😊😊😊😊😊 0️⃣7️⃣🔤0️⃣8️⃣ 1️⃣4️⃣🔤0️⃣0️⃣ Не забывай, пересыл кенту и буст каналу увеличивают шансы на победу! Удачи!

custom 528085679232100634822custom 52760302583976205461

30 Jul 2026, 07:59 UTC340 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

Играешь с читами?

  1. Да40%
  2. Нет67%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

28 Jul 2026, 05:05 UTC414 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

С момента вайпа прошло более 16 часов Как ваши успехи на данный момент? Мои: Создал стеш (через недельку-две спалю корды) Нашел территорию под фармилку В /ec уже 2 тала круша с 2 булавами круша И я понял то что в пвп кит герцога добавили шипы 💀 Пульс скоро станет читом на фантайме, прямо как и дестра уже стал

custom 52760302583976205465custom 52808567923210063485

27 Jul 2026, 09:29 UTC323 views18 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

Газ самый масштабный конкурс за все время на этом канале? За ⭐ под постом решу будет или нет)

custom 528085679232100634813custom 52760302583976205465

26 Jul 2026, 04:56 UTC339 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

С этим можно стримить? Или забанят Из-за дилдо скорее всего забанят

custom 52808567923210063487

26 Jul 2026, 04:56 UTC361 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 10 РЕАКЦИЙ И ВЫКЛАДЫВАЮ НОВЫЙ❤️ 😑 Подпишись чтобы не пропустить новые рп 😑

custom 52808567923210063488custom 52760302583976205462custom 52761666837388099241

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @VorteksFT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Jul 2026, 07:59 UTCAnonymous Poll63 voters

Играешь с читами?

  1. Да40%
  2. Нет67%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

26 Jul 2026, 04:45 UTCAnonymous Poll44 voters

Что важнее

  1. Скилл в ПВП75%
  2. Слушать как на меня орут36%

The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 153,879 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Vorteks FT” (@VorteksFT), 513 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VorteksFT.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.