#Telegram #Paws Pass the CAPTCHA to secure your AirDrop http://paws.community/app?tab=claim 🐦Our X(Twitter) ✉️Our Chat
👍1custom 54249724700231040891

Channel
@Vla0x
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
11subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002470000665 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Vla0x |
| Description | Crypto stuff, shitposts, and all that jazz My X: https://x.com/0xVla |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 17 December 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Vla0x |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 11 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:10 | 11 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
88 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 70 | 79.5% | |
| 👌 | 10 | 11.4% | |
| custom 5424972470023104089 | 5 | 5.68% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 1.14% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 1.14% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 1.14% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 88reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 December 2024 to 6 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Vla0x. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 December 2024 to 6 February 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
#Telegram #Paws Pass the CAPTCHA to secure your AirDrop http://paws.community/app?tab=claim 🐦Our X(Twitter) ✉️Our Chat
👍1custom 54249724700231040891
#Telegram #Paws New limited task in Paws ‼️ Press the start button, and the timer begins—let’s see what happens next Start ➡️ @PawsOG_bot 🐦Our X(Twitter) ✉️Our Chat
👍3👌1
#Telegram #Paws Check your eligibility Mandatory tasks: ✅Verify on website ✅Complete 30 quests ✅Save your tokens from Grinch ✅Activity check (soon) Recommended: ✅Voting badge (could be upgraded) ✅Contributing TON ($wPaws) (could be upgraded) ✅300k+ $Paws balance Check ➡️ https://paws.community/app?tab=claim 🐦Our X(Twitter) ✉️Our Chat
👍3custom 54249724700231040892🍾1🤝1
#Telegram #Paws New limited task in Paws ‼️ Erase the hidden task to complete it Start ➡️ @PawsOG_bot Paws released a QA where they mentioned that one of the main criteria will be completing tasks (not all of them). That’s why they keep adding new ones even after the snapshot. Make sure to complete all tasks so you don’t miss any IMPORTANT ones! 🐦Our X(Twitter) ✉️Our Chat
👍5👌1
#Telegram #Clayton 😼Clayton! You can now check your $Clay allocation, but this is just the first phase—distribution will happen in 3 waves Check ➡️ @Clayton 🐦Our X(Twitter) ✉️Our Chat
👍5
#Telegram #Dogs 🐶Time to submit your check-in results in the Dogs, and hey, if you miss some days, you can get them back with Telegram stars Start ➡️ @Dogs 🐦Our X(Twitter) ✉️Our Chat
👍5
#Telegram #Paws New MANDATORY task in Paws ‼️ Join to Paws through the web version and connect your Ton and Solana wallets Start ➡️ @PawsOG_bot 🐦Our X(Twitter) ✉️Our Chat
👍5
#Telegram #HotWallet ❗Missions in their current form will be expired on January 1st We also plan to work on inactive wallets. Our focus has always been on active users who engage with our product ❤ This is your last chance to earn $HOT through tasks, and it looks like mining might be closing soon. Don’t miss the opportunity to grab as much $HOT as possible—the current futures price is $23 per $HOT ‼️ Start ➡️ @ho…
👍5
#Telegram #Paws New limited tasks in Paws ‼️ Start ➡️ @PawsOG_bot Snapshot 30 DEC 🐦Our X(Twitter) ✉️Our Chat
👍5
🤑Big update in Blum! I’m talking about Season 2 🤡 Here’s what’s new: A trading bot has been added! It can: snipe memecoins, trade with limit orders, copy trade wallets, and more features are on the way (maybe soon). Meme Points (MP) are introduced, and you can earn them like this: Launch a memecoin on Mempad: +50 MP Your memecoin reaches a DEX: +10k MP Trade memecoins: +50 MP for every $10 in volume Use the t…
👍4👌1
#Telegram #Blum 🤑 If you still haven’t used your tickets in Blum, now’s the perfect time—you can earn 1k+ points per game. Also, the app will soon transition from the tap2earn method to trade2earn, so now’s your chance to rack up as many points as possible! Start ➡️ @Blum 🐦Our X(Twitter) ✉️Our Chat
👍4
#Telegram #Paws Our $PAWS were stolen by the Grinch! 🎩 To get them back, go to the Pawsmas tab and complete the tasks before Christmas. Start ➡️ @PawsOG_bot 🐦Our X(Twitter) ✉️Our Chat
👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Vla0x. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 690,751 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Vla0x named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“0xVla – Airdrop Activities” (@Vla0x), 11 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Vla0x.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.