Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Vizor Wallet

Supergroup

Vizor Wallet

@Vizorwallet

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry

5,912members

+2,917 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

71 online right now

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004336605948
TypeSupergroup
Username@Vizorwallet
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 September 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Vizorwallet

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,7226,4194,070.57 August 2026 — 2,995 members8 August 2026 — 2,930 members11 August 2026 — 2,647 members14 August 2026 — 2,511 members18 August 2026 — 2,341 members21 August 2026 — 2,227 members24 August 2026 — 2,030 members28 August 2026 — 1,886 members30 August 2026 — 1,722 members3 September 2026 — 3,622 members7 September 2026 — 3,622 members8 September 2026 — 6,419 members12 September 2026 — 6,275 members16 September 2026 — 6,096 members25 September 2026 — 5,912 members5,9127 August 202625 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 49 days, net +2,917. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,017–7,124 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every members count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)MembersChange
25 Sept 2026, 06:175,912-184
16 Sept 2026, 14:196,096-179
12 Sept 2026, 13:596,275-144
8 Sept 2026, 08:166,419+2,797
7 Sept 2026, 13:453,622no change
3 Sept 2026, 09:423,622+1,900
30 Aug 2026, 18:031,722-164
28 Aug 2026, 02:131,886-144
24 Aug 2026, 19:582,030-197
21 Aug 2026, 00:232,227-114
18 Aug 2026, 03:252,341-170
14 Aug 2026, 22:572,511-136
11 Aug 2026, 11:042,647-283
8 Aug 2026, 06:242,930-65
7 Aug 2026, 07:332,995first reading

Engagement

Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Vizor Wallet” (@Vizorwallet), 5,912 members as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Vizorwallet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.