Channel
@VisionenErde2
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
9,044subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001379850217 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @VisionenErde2 |
| Created | 22 December 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/VisionenErde2 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:55 | 9,044 | -5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 9,049 | -6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:01 | 9,055 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:17 | 9,056 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:51 | 9,056 | first reading |
35 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 35 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 35 (24 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 42,800 |
| Reactions total | 158 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 15:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
158 reactions across 14 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🥰 | 91 | 57.6% | |
| 👍 | 67 | 42.4% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 158reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Was um Himmels willen hält Christiane da in der Hand? Fruchtleder. Und ja: Das Ding ist wirklich so groß. 😄 Wenn im Sommer Kirschen, Pflaumen, Beeren & Co. gleichzeitig reif werden, macht Christiane daraus seit Jahren Fruchtleder und Fruchtmus. Ganz ohne zugesetzten Zucker, ohne feste Rezepte und ohne stundenlang in der Küche zu stehen. Ihr Sauerkirschleder schmeckt dabei wie die süß-sauren Drops, nach denen sie a…
Photo, posted without a caption
Wer mich schon länger begleitet, weiß: Selbstversorgung bedeutet für mich weit mehr als eigenes Gemüse. Es geht darum, das eigene Leben wieder selbst in die Hand zu nehmen – bei Lebensmitteln, Entscheidungen und letztlich auch bei den Finanzen. Vom Nordbalkon bis zum Waldgarten habe ich gelernt: Unabhängigkeit beginnt mit Eigenverantwortung. Deshalb habe ich mit Daniel erneut ein kostenloses Live-Webinar zur finan…
Zwischen To-do-Listen, Bildschirmen und ständiger Erreichbarkeit vergeht so ein Tag oft, ohne dass man einmal wirklich durchatmet. Die Natur wird dann zur Kulisse – etwas, das am Fenster vorbeizieht, irgendwo da draußen, im Grünen. Dabei liegt genau dort etwas, das viele von uns vermissen, ohne es benennen zu können: Ruhe. Verbindung. Das Gefühl, geerdet zu sein. Christel Ströbel lädt Dich ein, für einen Moment au…
Photo, posted without a caption
😅 𝗞𝗲𝗻𝗻𝘀𝘁 𝗱𝘂 𝗱𝗮𝘀? Grillnachmittag mit der ganzen Familie. Drei Stunden Garten, Kartoffelsalat, Smalltalk. Und du hältst die ganze Zeit den Mund. 💊 Deine Mutter erzählt stolz von ihrer neuen Tablettenkombi. 🌭 Dein Vater trinkt 1 Liter Cola-Light auf ex und witzelt über deine „Verschwörungstheorien". 📺 Dein Schwager zitiert die Tagesschau wie aus der Bibel. ⚡️ Dein Neffe leert seinen zweiten Energydrink, und alle nick…
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Letzte Chance: Nur noch wenige Stunden bis zum Live Workshop Nur noch wenige Stunden, dann startet der kostenfreie Live Workshop mit Marvin und Pia Lödige, verpasse ihn nicht. ⏰ Dein Gehirn kennt fünf unterschiedliche mentale Zustände, doch die meisten Erwachsenen verbringen ihre wache Zeit fast ausschließlich in nur einem davon, dem angespannten Beta-Zustand. Der Zugang zu Erholung, Kreativität und Höchstleistung …
https://youtu.be/IZniqYFMTfY?is=zFxybVH3qZJqPnfW
🥰3
Was Pythagoras schon wusste, bevor es EEG gab Vor über zweitausend Jahren experimentierte Pythagoras im antiken Griechenland mit dem Monochord, einem einfachen Saiteninstrument, um harmonische Klänge hör und spürbar zu machen. Auch in der traditionellen chinesischen Medizin wurden Energiepunkte entlang der Meridiane gezielt mit Schwingung stimuliert. Was lange als Esoterik galt, bestätigt heute die moderne Hirnfor…
@Lachkanal
🥰13👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @VisionenErde2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,139,997 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“WasDichNährt” (@VisionenErde2), 9,044 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VisionenErde2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.