Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Virus Calls ๐Ÿ’‰

Channel

Virus Calls ๐Ÿ’‰

@VirusCalls

On this record: Topic ยท Observations ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Posts recorded as deleted ยท Citations ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry

8,957subscribers

-323 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 3,162โ€“10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001594520113
TypeChannel
Username@VirusCalls
DescriptionSUB / PIN & FOLLOW ME ON X BITCH! http://www.Twitter.com/VirusSendski DYOR ๐Ÿ“ Remeber the risks of investing in crypto before you ape. ____________________________________
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/VirusCalls

Topic

Crypto & trading โ€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโ€™s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a modelโ€™s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegramโ€™s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts โ€” open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@VirusCalls/15827 ยท this entry16 Aug 2026, 20:36 UTC@Crypto_FexirGems/2377916 Aug 2026, 20:37 UTC1.00under a minute
@VirusCalls/15849 ยท this entry22 Aug 2026, 18:47 UTC@Crypto_FexirGems/2394622 Aug 2026, 18:47 UTC1.00under a minute
@VirusCalls/15872 ยท this entry24 Aug 2026, 18:12 UTC@Crypto_FexirGems/2400024 Aug 2026, 18:12 UTC1.00under a minute
@VirusCalls/15874 ยท this entry24 Aug 2026, 18:23 UTC@Crypto_FexirGems/2400224 Aug 2026, 18:23 UTC1.00under a minute
@VirusCalls/15923 ยท this entry26 Aug 2026, 22:36 UTC@Crypto_FexirGems/2405526 Aug 2026, 22:37 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@Crypto_FexirGems5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (5โ€“0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp โ€” in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

โ€œPublished firstโ€ means first in this corpus. We hold 55 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detectorโ€™s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through โ€” we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

8,9579,2809,118.57 August 2026 โ€” 9,280 subscribers7 August 2026 โ€” 9,280 subscribers7 August 2026 โ€” 9,278 subscribers10 August 2026 โ€” 9,270 subscribers13 August 2026 โ€” 9,253 subscribers16 August 2026 โ€” 9,235 subscribers19 August 2026 โ€” 9,218 subscribers23 August 2026 โ€” 9,194 subscribers26 August 2026 โ€” 9,199 subscribers29 August 2026 โ€” 9,201 subscribers31 August 2026 โ€” 9,237 subscribers4 September 2026 โ€” 9,229 subscribers9 September 2026 โ€” 9,232 subscribers13 September 2026 โ€” 9,225 subscribers17 September 2026 โ€” 9,214 subscribers26 September 2026 โ€” 9,178 subscribers5 October 2026 โ€” 9,124 subscribers10 October 2026 โ€” 9,096 subscribers14 October 2026 โ€” 9,081 subscribers17 October 2026 โ€” 9,057 subscribers20 October 2026 โ€” 9,042 subscribers24 October 2026 โ€” 9,026 subscribers27 October 2026 โ€” 9,013 subscribers30 October 2026 โ€” 8,995 subscribers2 November 2026 โ€” 8,978 subscribers6 November 2026 โ€” 8,968 subscribers9 November 2026 โ€” 8,957 subscribers7 August 20269 November 2026
27 measurements spanning 94 days, net -323. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 8,909โ€“9,328 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 09:368,957-11
6 Nov 2026, 03:278,968-10
2 Nov 2026, 22:188,978-17
30 Oct 2026, 18:178,995-18
27 Oct 2026, 11:269,013-13
24 Oct 2026, 06:469,026-16
20 Oct 2026, 23:569,042-15
17 Oct 2026, 13:289,057-24
14 Oct 2026, 07:549,081-15
10 Oct 2026, 23:559,096-28
5 Oct 2026, 03:569,124-54
26 Sept 2026, 16:599,178-36
17 Sept 2026, 18:169,214-11
13 Sept 2026, 10:599,225-7
9 Sept 2026, 07:169,232+3
4 Sept 2026, 03:169,229-8
31 Aug 2026, 23:389,237+36
29 Aug 2026, 06:259,201+2
26 Aug 2026, 07:289,199+5
23 Aug 2026, 07:049,194first reading

Engagement

127 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
8.40%
avg views รท 8,957 subscribers
Avg views / post
752
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.991%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 127 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held127 (4 August 2026 โ€“ 11 November 2026)
Views total15,801
Reactions total112
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 12:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
โ‰ˆ3,310
Videos
โ‰ˆ914
Links
โ‰ˆ5,170

Lifetime counters from Telegramโ€™s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 โ€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 17s
Average length
6s

Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ€” not this channelโ€™s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโ€™s own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

674 reactions across 87 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค23134.3%
๐Ÿ”ฅ14822.0%
๐Ÿ’ฏ527.72%
๐Ÿ‘416.08%
๐Ÿ‘Œ345.04%
๐Ÿ‘304.45%
๐Ÿ˜ฑ243.56%
๐Ÿ˜˜152.23%
๐Ÿ†142.08%
๐Ÿคฏ142.08%
๐Ÿณ111.63%
๐Ÿค—101.48%
๐Ÿ‘€81.19%
๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿ’ป71.04%
๐Ÿ•Š60.89%
๐Ÿฅฐ60.89%
๐ŸŽ‰50.742%
๐Ÿ˜ˆ50.742%
๐Ÿคฉ40.593%
โšก20.297%
4 further kinds71.04%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 90 of the 127 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 674 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 127 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegramโ€™s own โ€˜editedโ€™ marker: 3 of 21 posts held from the last 30 days (14.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before โ€” this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 01:05 UTC264 views8 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

This is when you grab the conviction plays. We are nearing "Extreme Fear" on the meter.. Buy the blood, not the green ๐Ÿ˜‰ But you a pussy right? Scared money dont make money

โค6๐Ÿ‘Œ1๐Ÿ”ฅ1

9 Nov 2026, 14:38 UTC364 views5 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Afternoon BUY $CATE End of post. Thanks very much!

โค3๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿ”ฅ1

7 Nov 2026, 17:15 UTC692 views15 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Afternoon Not to be rude to anyone but how you lot trading new pairs with the state of the market and sentiment rn? Just shows that most of you are addicts and gamblers in a digital casino. Go touch grass and stick yo bags in higher mc meme coins that are already established and conviction is high!

๐Ÿ’ฏ7โค5๐Ÿ”ฅ3

6 Nov 2026, 20:42 UTC612 views11 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Every few years the market throws untold amounts of severe news / fud at your levels of holding tolerance and patience.... Question is - are you built like the OGs who are immune to the game and have no trading emotions anymore. We just hold whatever the weather โ˜”๏ธ ๐ŸŒค ๐Ÿ˜Ž๐Ÿฅด

๐Ÿ‘7๐Ÿ’ฏ2โค1๐Ÿ”ฅ1

5 Nov 2026, 10:08 UTC658 views9 reactionsread 12 November 2026

GM โ˜•๏ธ BUY $CATE + $TROLL Hold both until guaranteed billions All else is noise and distraction

โค6๐Ÿ˜˜2๐Ÿ’ฏ1

4 Nov 2026, 22:13 UTC604 viewsread 12 November 2026
Forwarded from @WatcherGuruPhoto

JUST IN: ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ $1,200,000,000,000 added to the US stock market today. @WatcherGuru

4 Nov 2026, 15:00 UTC667 viewsread 12 November 2026

https://x.com/VirusSendski/status/2117993744674804074 Read it u dumb fucks

4 Nov 2026, 15:00 UTCโ‰ˆ1,120 viewsread 12 November 2026
Video

๐Ÿ†• | CATE BUY! by @MajorBuyBot ๐Ÿˆ ๐Ÿˆ ๐Ÿˆ ๐Ÿˆ ๐Ÿˆ ๐Ÿˆ ๐Ÿˆ ๐Ÿˆ ๐Ÿˆ ๐Ÿ”ท SOL 25.4745 ($2419.31) ๐Ÿช™ CATE 59615.96 (Tx) ๐Ÿ”Ž Position: New Holder (Wallet) ๐Ÿ“ˆ MCap: $39,126,551 ๐Ÿ“ฃ Socials: ๐—ช๐—ฒ๐—ฏ | ๐—ง๐—ด ๐Ÿฆ…๐Ÿฆ…๐Ÿฆ…๐Ÿฆ… ๐Ÿ“Š ๐—–๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜ ๐Ÿ’ฒ ๐—•๐˜‚๐˜†

4 Nov 2026, 10:49 UTC532 views3 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Ape $CATE with size. Stfu and leave it alone. Prob is 70% + of you don't have the discipline to do so...๐Ÿ˜‚ Its at 38m mc btw. Mega steal. ( I called this at 230k ๐Ÿ™‚โ€โ†”๏ธ) Ai66LHZG9MCzg1WKdawwqduVAXpNDUuV8M3uyq5ppump https://x.com/VirusSendski/status/2117930857193242641

โค1๐Ÿ”ฅ1๐Ÿ˜ฑ1

30 Oct 2026, 17:35 UTC743 views5 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

226k views and counting on my reply to CZ ๐Ÿค” that also involved Elon

โค2๐Ÿ”ฅ2๐Ÿ‘Œ1

30 Oct 2026, 12:30 UTC708 views8 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

https://x.com/VirusSendski/status/2116114316604666059 100k views in 2hrs off a reply to CZ who tried to attack and threaten Elon for trolling him ๐Ÿ˜‚ Does he know who tf Elon is ๐Ÿ˜ Fucking manipulating POS he is. Enough is enough!

๐Ÿ”ฅ4๐Ÿ’ฏ2๐Ÿคฏ1๐Ÿ˜Ž1

29 Oct 2026, 23:29 UTC828 views11 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Fuck CZ Fuck Binance Fuck BNB This fucking ulgy chinese fuck manipulates the market beyond belief. You really think this $5B hack was legit a random person / group to the biggest exchange in the world??..... lol 5 BILLION DOLLARS...you high if you think this wasnt staged or planned. Last Oct this cunt CZ fucked us and this Oct he's fucked us again and all the while him and his inner people make gama mills upon milโ€ฆ

โค6๐Ÿ‘Œ3๐Ÿคฉ1๐Ÿ˜1

Showing the 12 most recent of 127 posts we hold for @VirusCalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 7 posts on @VirusCalls as deleted โ€” posts this register held that were missing from the channelโ€™s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channelโ€™s public page, and when โ€” not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
10 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
25 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
20 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegramโ€™s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโ€™s query is independent of having been queried itself.

๐Ÿฆ LION CALLS ๐Ÿฆ | LionCalls.io
@LionCALL ยท 67,860
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 86 here โ€” alongside 85 others โ€” read 10 September 2026
ETH LP Lock, Burn
@ethsafesniper ยท 26,216
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 83 here โ€” alongside 82 others โ€” read 11 September 2026
CaesarsCalls
@Caesars_Calls ยท 38,088
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 82 here โ€” alongside 81 others โ€” read 30 August 2026
Cookie sale's ๐Ÿช
@Cookiesales ยท 77,829
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 93 here โ€” alongside 92 others โ€” read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโ€™s list for THAT channel, not this one โ€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œVirus Calls ๐Ÿ’‰โ€ (@VirusCalls), 8,957 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VirusCalls.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.