Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Vile Essences (DISBAND)

@VileEssences

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

2,251subscribers

-15 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002211908424
TypeChannel
Username@VileEssences
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/VileEssences

Growth

2,2512,2662,258.56 August 2026 — 2,266 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,265 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,257 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,251 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,249–2,268 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 14:452,251-6
9 Aug 2026, 19:312,257-8
6 Aug 2026, 14:422,265-1
6 Aug 2026, 09:332,266first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 24 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
29s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

19 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💘947.4%
🕊736.8%
315.8%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 24 August 2025 to 27 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Jan 2026, 02:02 UTC596 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Hi everyone! Today we’re closing a chapter that has meant so much to us. @VileEssences will officially be DISBANDING as of today. This choice came from a long process of reflection and open discussions, not from impulse. We’ve shared growth and countless moments we’ll always be proud of. However, we’ve reached a point where continuing together no longer feels aligned with where we’re each headed. We want to express

💘9🕊7

10 Oct 2025, 01:59 UTC610 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @BONSTlEZPhoto

ㅤ ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ 𝐄 𝐆 𝐑 𝐄 𝐆 𝐈 𝐎 𝐔 𝐒 ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ 𝐅 𝐋 𝐀 𝐆 𝐑 𝐀 𝐍 𝐓 💥 ๋ ࣭ ㅤㅤㅤ Crackerjack Frontage: Invoking ㅤㅤㅤ Headbanger Broadside Between ㅤㅤㅤ Obstreperous Extolment In ⤉ ⤈ ㅤ Brandishing Retrograde Peregrinations. ㅤㅤ 🚬 ∿ ݁ Elicited Selcouth Alterations ㅤㅤ Drilled BabyMonster inbound 10th ㅤㅤ of October, 2025. Forged Thrilling ㅤㅤ Illustrious #WeGoUp and Waltzed ㅤㅤ Stratagems of Riotous Backpedal ㅤㅤ Endeavour.

10 Oct 2025, 01:59 UTC≈1,060 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @BONSTlEZ

ㅤ ✶. .% Downtown diurnal engrossed limelight and gyrated amidst by-passers passim deference of conspicuous wits. Galloping in wide-awake borough schlepped crowded cheers for BABYMONSTER, clicking of camera took portraits whilst lodestar effulged in crepuscule zeitgeist. 𝁾𖣇𝁾 Captivating all types of persona subsequent to pop up an incredulous scene; Archetypal fractions and hoisting prominence with WE GO UP! ﹢🦠 ㅤㅤㅤ⚔️

2

28 Sept 2025, 18:15 UTC544 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

ㅤ [The calendar flips, marking a new joyous day for the VILENS' friend.] 🗓️ ㅤ│ㅤYo, I can't believe it's already 29'th of the ㅤ│ㅤmonth again? Ugh, this feels like a drag. But even though I'm feeling a bit sluggish, as a good friend, I just have to say congratulations on your jubilee @ShurikenSociety, @TheVansents, @Shineninng, @MyungCrimson, @Lunevain, and @Yfrienade Here, I got you a little gift. To be honest, this

1

27 Sept 2025, 09:48 UTC305 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @CalsearthPhoto

ㅤ ✶ The Fourth Gate Of Calsearth: A Journey Home Through Yonder ㅤㅤㅤㅤ Mystical Wood (🕯) . Hush now, hush—do you hear it? The rustling leaves, The trees are sighing in sleepy riddles and the river hums a melody only the moon understands (‘&.) somewhere, just beyond the veil of the common world; a door doth creak open with a knowing smile. This is not merely a journey to seeketh a family to fill a void, bu

25 Sept 2025, 14:48 UTC213 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @AfrodistrellaVideo

ㅤㅤTHE GLASS BEAD IS FADING. 🌟 (...) Once, there were six sisters. They were bound by fate, by power, by love. But love turned to jealousy, and power turned to ruin. All six fell. One by one, they lost themselves—until only one remained. But even she is fading now, her strength nearly gone, her magic slipping away. ㅤㅤ🔮ㅤThen, the glass bead called to her. It whispered of a second chance. ㅤㅤㅤㅤA way to go back. ㅤㅤㅤA w

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @VileEssences. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 538,453 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Vile Essences (DISBAND)” (@VileEssences), 2,251 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VileEssences.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.