Сегодня у меня День Рождения! 🎉🎊🎉 36 лет! 🕯свечи, коробка любимых конфет, интересный сериал, атмосфера уюта вокруг... Прекрасное начало праздничного дня😍 Этот год показал как многогранны наши возможности. В этом году исполнялись мечты, желания и они продолжают исполняться! Желаю себе за этот год прокачать необходимые навыки для ещё большего достижения целей. Для масштабных реализаций. Для меня каждый год - год но…

Channel
Вик, зажги мои продажи⚡️
@VikkyKovaleva
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
363subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001787852881 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @VikkyKovaleva |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/VikkyKovaleva |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:59 | 363 | -3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 366 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:57 | 367 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:47 | 369 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:37 | 369 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 7 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
11 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 7 | 63.6% | |
| custom 5381823390321493361 | 2 | 18.2% | |
| custom 5197655678000321487 | 1 | 9.09% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 9.09% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 7 October 2025 to 19 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 15 we hold a reading for · 7%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @VikkyKovaleva. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 October 2025 to 19 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Всем привет) Расскажите, кто установил уже макс себе, как вам?) Нас обязывают в саду в него переходить. Общение с воспитателями в других мессенджерах под запретом прям... Вот мне интересно кого также перевели в школах и садах, что думаете?.
Сейчас смотрели всей семьёй мульт "Дикий Робот". Давно я таких глубоких не видела. Потрясающие смыслы о доброте, любви и дружбе заложены. Я проплакала всю вторую половину) Кто не смотрел, советую с детьми это сделать. Вам точно понравится. Красивая картинка, классный юмор. Стоит повторного просмотра.
100% оригинальный контент. Отвечу и здесь на этот вопрос. 99% - генерирую в нейросетях, пользуюсь двумя для этих задач. 1%- мои фото и видео Текст: в пиксарт, а последнее время при выкладке прям в Пинтерест. В нейрошках мне не всегда выдаёт без ошибок, поэтому если желания возиться с корректировками нет, то я и не прошу ничего писать. Помните время, когда брали на стоках изображения? 😊 Сейчас шикарная возможност…
👆Обожаю такие честные, "не вылезанные" отзывы. Огонь просто 🔥 Инна Фитнес Тренер- пришла с запросом на воронки. Багаж опыта огромный, а в соц сетях только месяц. Поэтому что к чему тут не до конца понятно. Разложила, естееесно дала связку с Pinterest для бесплатного трафика, т.к в нём есть потребность. Разложила на чем делать упор, чтобы люди шли в канал и покупали её групповой мини продукт и личную работу. Всё. Т…
#отзыв
Постить пины, чтобы пришло 20 человек? Нафиг надо.... Давайте разбираться что к чему. У каждого есть два пути... Хотя нет.. Три😉 по набору аудитории в тг канал. 1- плати 2- не плати 3- не плати и плати Думаю вы поняли))) На моём опыте все) Я работала многими подходами: от комментинга до таргета. И я всегда зато, чтобы владеть разными способами. Т.к всё настолько нестабильно и быстро перекрывается одно другим, что…
🔥5
Кстати, понаблюдать за ростом Мастерской можно 😉 подписывайтесь Сейчас канал растёт чисто через пинтерест.
999%-предел? В процентном соотношении может и да, но в остальном далеко нет! За два месяца я вывела аккаунт мастерской более чем на 2 миллиона показов, 300 000 просмотров. В ТГ 40 человек В Pinterest 46 Это та площадка, которая даёт аудиторию полностью бесплатно. Притом там абсолютно понятны алгоритмы, никаких велосипедов не нужно изобретать. Даёшь нужный контент и он начинает через определённое время давать теб…
🔥2💯1
Хочешь много Денег и клиентов? Новеньким Добро Пожаловать😉 Вот здесь находится дайджест постов, которые тебе помогут с продвижением твоего блога! Хочешь ? Я знаю хочешь🔥, тогда жми сюда
custom 51976556780003214871
Скажу сейчас одну классную фразу, для кого-то она является болью, но при этом для всех спасеньем в продажах😉 "Канал должен быть не закрытым, он должен быть интересным"
Ну и конечно полюбившийся котик))) Я таких ласковых и идущих на руки к чужим людям, наверное не видела никогда.
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @VikkyKovaleva. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Вик, зажги мои продажи⚡️” (@VikkyKovaleva), 363 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VikkyKovaleva.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.