Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for КОРАБЕЛОВНА ⚓️

Channel

КОРАБЕЛОВНА ⚓️

@Vika_korabel_ru

On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

17,421subscribers

-52 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001330366539
TypeChannel
Username@Vika_korabel_ru
DescriptionВиктория Корабеловна, Морской блогер. Рассказываю о судостроении в России с места событий Мой номер: +7(921)9120373 @viktoriia_korabelovna #JLD5G https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=673defbd31a9292acd2519d1&registryType=bloggersPermission
Created15 November 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Vika_korabel_ru

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

17,42117,47417,447.56 August 2026 — 17,473 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,473 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,474 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,473 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,470 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,467 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,461 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,452 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,448 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,436 subscribers15 August 2026 — 17,432 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,427 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,421 subscribers6 August 202617 August 2026
13 measurements spanning 12 days, net -52. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,413–17,482 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 19:3617,421-6
16 Aug 2026, 19:3817,427-5
15 Aug 2026, 05:5717,432-4
14 Aug 2026, 01:0717,436-12
12 Aug 2026, 16:0417,448-4
11 Aug 2026, 16:4617,452-9
10 Aug 2026, 14:2117,461-6
9 Aug 2026, 14:1517,467-3
8 Aug 2026, 15:1117,470-3
7 Aug 2026, 12:3717,473-1
6 Aug 2026, 15:0317,474+1
6 Aug 2026, 06:3017,473no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:2317,473first reading

Engagement

111 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.11%
avg views ÷ 17,421 subscribers
Avg views / post
541
110 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.477%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
111
of 111 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 53 of 110 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held111 (4 August 202618 August 2026)
Views total59,520
Reactions total153
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 05:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
20,600
Videos
3,800
Links
17,800

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
21m 00s
Average length
1m 10s

Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

129 reactions across 40 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7658.9%
custom 53235140639074766991914.7%
custom 53190378060419165701814.0%
custom 52649256934682429231612.4%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 53 of the 111 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 153reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 111 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
17
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 110 we hold a reading for · 12%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Vika_korabel_ru. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 111 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 18 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
0.901%
1 of 111 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
397
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
482
over 109 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFH63h4M117 August 202617 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 111 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 18 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

18 Aug 2026, 03:20 UTC157 viewsread 18 August 2026
Photo

ПРАВИЛЬНЫЙ РАЗМЕР ОТВЕРСТИЯ ИЛИ НУЖНЫЙ РЕЗУЛЬТАТ? Ан Марин Консалтинг В судостроении существуют два разных подхода к регулированию. Первый — предписывающий: «Сделайте отверстие строго такого размера». Второй — целевой, или функциональный: «Обеспечьте удаление воды за установленное время и подтвердите это расчётом». Недавно одно зарубежное классификационное общество потребовало предусмотреть на проектируемом нам

17 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC333 viewsread 18 August 2026
Photo

#ИтогидняКорабелов 🚢Спуск на воду МФАСС «Певек» планируется во втором квартале 2027 года 🔷Второй пассажирский катамаран проекта «Соммерс-L» готовят к спуску на воду 🔷На строящийся атомоход «Ленинград» проекта 22220 установили реакторы 🔷В строительство порта Индига инвестируют около 10 млрд рублей 🏗«Академик Ломоносов» получит новое ядерное топливо ⚓️Модернизированный теплоход «Нева-4» начал выполнять прогулочны

17 Aug 2026, 13:03 UTC334 viewsread 18 August 2026
Photo

#ЧИТАЮКОРАБЕЛ на судостроительных заводах, верфях и КБ 2026 год 📍 Пролетарский завод ▶️Скачать журнал #3 (77) 2026 по ссылке https://disk.yandex.ru/i/dPM1SNwelfT2Ng

17 Aug 2026, 11:55 UTC597 viewsread 18 August 2026
Photo

🚢 «СП Чайка» представила проект арктического буксира на форуме «Арктика. Регионы» 13–14 августа в рамках форума «Арктика. Регионы» компания «СП Чайка» представила свой первый индивидуальный проект NP19T — компактный буксир-кантовщик ледового класса Arc4. Проект создан с учетом специфики работы в суровых арктических условиях. Буксир предназначен для эксплуатации в акватории порта и на рейде и рассчитан на широкий сп

17 Aug 2026, 10:30 UTC352 views1 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Video

Ледокол «Невская застава» против зимнего наводнения ❄️🛡️ Задача ледокола — разрушать эту заторы льда, пока вода не вышла из берегов #НевскаяЗастава #ледокол #Нева #судостроение #корабелРилз #Петербург #инженерия #безопасностьгорода Полный обзор судна в Вк видео Ваша Виктория Корабеловна⚓⚓

1

17 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC348 viewsread 18 August 2026
Photo

#ОбзорПрессы О чем пишут федеральные СМИ сегодня, 17 августа 🔹В Арктике запущен «Ледовый шелковый путь» 🔹Плодородное сотрудничество: Бразилия наращивает закупки российских удобрений 🔹Уловный сигнал. Глава ВАРПЭ - о ситуации с судовым топливом, браконьерской икре и "предательстве" иваси Подробнее читайте на Корабел.ру

17 Aug 2026, 08:04 UTC397 views0 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2W5zFH63h4MPhoto

ЮМАТЕКС Термо для судостроительной изоляции с новым покрытием ООО «Росатом Изоплит», отечественный производитель теплоизоляции в Тверской области, подтверждает высокие стандарты изготовления каменной ваты для строительной отрасли. Продукция широко применяется как в системах ОВК и промышленности, так и в судовой изоляции. С 2025 года в ассортименте компании стали доступны к заказу современные высокотехнологичные про

17 Aug 2026, 03:14 UTC426 viewsread 18 August 2026
Forwarded from @korabel_newsPhoto

ТАНЦУЕМ ОТ ГРУЗОВОЙ БАЗЫ: НУЖЕН ЛИ РОССИИ НОВЫЙ ФЛОТ ДЛЯ АМУРА? ⚓️ Россия планирует масштабное обновление флота и портовой инфраструктуры на Амуре. Госпрограмма развития судоходства на 2026–2040 годы предусматривает строительство 150 новых судов и увеличение грузопотока в 2–4 раза — до 4–7 млн тонн. Звучит масштабно. Но есть главный вопрос: а грузы будут? Сегодня российское судоходство на Амуре заметно уступает к

16 Aug 2026, 17:58 UTC651 views6 reactions2 Starsread 18 August 2026
Video

ТМ “Кедр” на Морском конгрессе: какие новинки в линейке? #видеоКорабелру Как эффективно варить? Ответ от ТМ “Кедр” 📍ТМ “Кедр” знаком многим предприятиям, сварочные аппараты отечественного производства занимают уверенную позицию на рынке. Но стоять на месте некогда, поэтому компания выпускает новинки и расширяет географию присутствия. 📍Дальневосточный регион, где находятся значимые отраслевые заводы, сегодня играет

2custom 52649256934682429232custom 53235140639074766992

Showing the 12 most recent of 111 posts we hold for @Vika_korabel_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 44,116 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“КОРАБЕЛОВНА ⚓️” (@Vika_korabel_ru), 17,421 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Vika_korabel_ru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.