https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Eqh71So79I0
β€9π3π1

Channel
@VibesOfCosmosAuthentic
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
3,259subscribers
+9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 3,162β10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001503696707 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @VibesOfCosmosAuthentic |
| Created | 26 July 2021 β measured β cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/VibesOfCosmosAuthentic |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:56 | 3,259 | +3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:25 | 3,256 | +4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:14 | 3,252 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:52 | 3,251 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:30 | 3,250 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:19 | 3,250 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 9 June 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 30 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (9 June 2026 β 30 July 2026) |
| Views total | 4,587 |
| Reactions total | 121 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 23:39 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
259 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 128 | 49.4% | |
| β€ | 101 | 39.0% | |
| π | 18 | 6.95% | |
| π€ | 8 | 3.09% | |
| π― | 3 | 1.16% | |
| π₯ | 1 | 0.386% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 259reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Eqh71So79I0
β€9π3π1
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=XFoO3dxr_I0
β€9π4π1
Inverted looks so familiar
β€14π1
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Eh4gM1gaevI
π10β€4π1
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=n9ZNx73-TBA
π12β€4π1
We have studied the sun's paths for years now, and we think we have a better understanding of our realm. Also many new ideas about the craters and the actual structure has being re-evaluated. Things are getting very very strange. Take care and big HUGE thank you for your support! πGoeVibes to ALL!π β€οΈ
β€26π13π€6π1π₯1
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=l85RgvR9pd4
π12β€8π1
Photo, posted without a caption
π6π€2π1
Photo, posted without a caption
π8β€1π1
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=eKzr2u2Vafg
π10β€2π1
For all us LUNAtics out there... enjoy the reality you knew all along, just VoC reminded you. GeoVibes to ALL! https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=uHFI0-54CGs
π9β€8π1
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qtpzFoAzLfk
π12β€4π1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @VibesOfCosmosAuthentic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank β 1,116,187 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βVIBES of COSMOSπβ (@VibesOfCosmosAuthentic), 3,259 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VibesOfCosmosAuthentic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.