https://www.youtube.com/live/N39siphrlhA?si=1VMvqA_-D2iHzlvg

Channel
Verónica Ressia
@VeronicaRessia
On this record: Topic · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,724subscribers
-195 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001171774010 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @VeronicaRessia |
| Created | 14 April 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/VeronicaRessia |
Topic
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Channels linked by matching posts
This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 11:11 | 6,724 | -1 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 18:37 | 6,725 | -3 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 02:50 | 6,728 | -5 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 20:20 | 6,733 | -8 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 15:41 | 6,741 | -9 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 12:15 | 6,750 | -8 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 22:37 | 6,758 | -9 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 12:27 | 6,767 | -1 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 18:38 | 6,768 | -8 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 11:20 | 6,776 | -3 |
| 7 Oct 2026, 02:55 | 6,779 | -17 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 20:17 | 6,796 | -23 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 08:58 | 6,819 | -11 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 12:37 | 6,830 | -15 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 00:37 | 6,845 | -13 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 16:19 | 6,858 | +2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:04 | 6,856 | -11 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:24 | 6,867 | -7 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:24 | 6,874 | -3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 16:39 | 6,877 | first reading |
Engagement
32 posts held, back to 27 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 16.6%
- avg views ÷ 6,724 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,120
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 32 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 32 (27 April 2026 – 3 November 2026) |
| Views total | 3,356 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Nov 2026, 15:39 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 12m 00s
- Average length
- 1m 30s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
https://youtu.be/ZS6sy5A7J30
https://youtu.be/EBdRlWKZrDQ
https://youtu.be/6MN4AXj8hJY
https://youtu.be/wTqU_EkmCgQ
https://youtu.be/UUQL8NBhsyo
https://youtu.be/HgQUgXlr9o4
🇩🇪 "Merz debe dimitir": una encuesta revela el descontento de los alemanes. Casi el 70 por ciento de los alemanes encuestados por la empresa "Ipsos" consideró que el trabajo del canciller alemán Friedrich Merz ha sido un fracaso, y el 58 por ciento cree que debería dejar su cargo. La mayoría, tanto en el oeste (64 por ciento) como en el este (80 por ciento) del país, le dio una evaluación negativa a Merz, mientras q…
Brasil echa a volar el primer caza Gripen de fabricación nacional y se perfila como proveedor regional Una década después de que el Gobierno de Brasil y la empresa sueca Saab firmaran el acuerdo de transferencia de tecnología, el primer avión caza supersónico Gripen construido en Brasil tuvo su vuelo inaugural, partiendo de las instalaciones de la fábrica Embraer en la localidad de Gavião Peixoto. En diálogo con S…
🇧🇷 BRASIL | TERCER INCENDIO EN UNA SEMANA EN LA UNIVERSIDAD FEDERAL DE PERNAMBUCO Un incendio de grandes proporciones devastó instalaciones de investigación de la Universidad Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE), en Recife, este 7 de octubre. El edificio albergaba investigaciones sobre cáncer, obesidad, COVID-19, autismo y TDAH. Es el tercer incendio en ocho días, tras los registrados el 30 de septiembre y el 5 de octubre…
🚨🇺🇸 El Pentágono ha anunciado que la ejecución por escuadra de fusilamiento del autor de la masacre de Fort Hood, Nidal Malik Hasan, se transmitirá en directo el 3 de diciembre. La masacre de Fort Hood (2009): Nidal Malik Hasan, ex mayor del Ejército de EE. UU., perpetró un tiroteo masivo el 5 de noviembre de 2009 en el que asesinó a 13 personas e hirió a 32. Fue condenado a muerte por un tribunal militar en 2013. …
🚨🇻🇪 Delcy Rodríguez anuncia que la Navidad comenzará oficialmente en Venezuela el 1 de noviembre, adelantando la temporada para “activar la felicidad de los venezolanos” y la actividad económica. 💠 Únete a nuestros canales de Telegram y Twitter X 📱 X: x.com/guerrasygeop 🔵 Canal: t.me/guerrasygeo ⚡ Chat: @GuerrasyGeop
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @VeronicaRessia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@nurparatodos81 · 21,790
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 21 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Verónica Ressia” (@VeronicaRessia), 6,724 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VeronicaRessia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.