8 measurements spanning 7 days, net -21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 66,017–66,623 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 13:08
66,294
-18
12 Aug 2026, 14:48
66,312
-149
11 Aug 2026, 13:52
66,461
-92
10 Aug 2026, 13:23
66,553
+466
9 Aug 2026, 16:01
66,087
-141
8 Aug 2026, 18:55
66,228
-31
7 Aug 2026, 22:03
66,259
-56
7 Aug 2026, 00:17
66,315
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
22.6%
avg views ÷ 66,294 subscribers
Avg views / post
15,000
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.973%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
15 (10 July 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
209,570
Reactions total
2,039
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 07:38 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
2,390 reactions across 15 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,227
51.3%
👍
680
28.5%
🔥
222
9.29%
👏
188
7.87%
💯
34
1.42%
🥰
15
0.628%
🎉
11
0.46%
🍾
6
0.251%
🐳
3
0.126%
🏆
2
0.084%
💋
2
0.084%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,390reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
467
across the posts below
Posts paid on
14
of 15 we hold a reading for · 93%
Most on one post
95
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @VeriVaultNetworks1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
📱 The VERV Official Discord Community Is Now Live! 🚀
To further strengthen global community interaction and drive the development of the VERV ecosystem, we have officially launched the VeriVault Chain Discord community! 🌐
Discord will serve as a key communication hub for the global VERV community, providing members with a more efficient, open, and convenient platform for engagement.
By joining the VERV Discord, yo…
📊 VERV Ecosystem "3+2" USDT Staking Incentive Campaign – Phase 2 Data Snapshot (August 1 – 7)
Thank you to all our community partners for your enthusiastic participation! Since the campaign launched, more and more partners have joined, and community engagement continues to rise. Let’s take a look at the data for this period.
📈 Campaign Data Overview (August 1 – August 7)
📇 Total Participants: 2,658
💬 Users Who Ear…
🎉 The VERV "3+2" Referral Leaderboard Challenge is officially live!🎦
🔥 The more you invite, the higher the rewards!
To thank our community for supporting the VERV ecosystem, we are launching a 15-day limited-time referral leaderboard event!
📅 Event Period：August 6, 2026 – August 21, 2026
📌 Event Rules
⏩During the event, successfully inviting new users who complete their first stake counts towards the leaderboard.…
📢【 July Node Partner Salary List 】
💰 VERV Global Node Partners' July salaries have been automatically settled. Relevant node partners can now view the latest salary list details.
📝 July Salary List Lookup :👉 Google Sheets
💰 All partners can check their salaries for this month in their respective KWTCN Wallet accounts.
🥰 Node Partner Salaries can be utilized for:
✅ Participating in the VVS Staking Airdrop Program
…
📊 VERV Ecosystem "3+2" USDT Staking Incentive Campaign – Phase 1 Data Snapshot (July 21–31)
Thank you to all our community partners for your enthusiastic participation! Since the campaign launched, more and more partners have joined in, and community engagement continues to soar. Let’s take a look at the data from this period.
📈 Campaign Data Overview (July 21–31)
📇 Total Participants: 1,579
💬 Users Who Earned Refe…
🔒 $40 Million Ecosystem Risk Reserve Fund
To further enhance the protection of user assets, VeriVault Chain has established a $40,000,000 Ecosystem Risk Reserve Fund.
⏩Serving as an additional layer of security alongside the VAPP asset protection protocol, this fund is designed to address extreme risks that may arise during the ecosystem's development, providing an extra buffer and protective support for user asse…
🔒 VeriVault Chain Security System Upgrade Announcement! Custody Partnership for $40M Ecosystem Risk Reserve Fund Officially Finalized🤝
To further enhance the ecosystem's security infrastructure and strengthen the protection of user assets, the core team of VeriVault Chain and the management team of BitGo concluded a security partnership meeting in Silicon Valley, California, on July 23, 2026. They officially finaliz…
🔔 Wallet Mnemonic Phrase Backup Reminder
To ensure the security of your assets, please be sure to keep your wallet mnemonic phrase safe.
✅ How to Back Up
✅ You can back up your mnemonic phrase when setting up your wallet.
✅Alternatively, go to [Me] > [Wallet Management], enter your password, and then view or back up the phrase.
✅ Purpose of the Mnemonic Phrase
✅ Restoring wallet access.
✅ Resetting your password…
🎁 VERV Ecosystem USDT Incentive Campaign Rules 🤝
1️⃣ Campaign Application
📝 Fill out the form to apply 👇
https://forms.gle/s4SDBBv6iU2EwK5AA
2️⃣ Get Campaign Guidance
After submitting the application:
➡️ Go to the KWTCN wallet homepage
➡️ Contact your dedicated Node Partner
➡️ Receive participation instructions and detailed rules
⚠️ Campaign Rules
1️⃣ Users must complete the registration application before particip…
🎁 VERV Ecosystem USDT Incentive Campaign Is Now Live 🎦 🔥🔥🔥
To further drive the development of the VERV ecosystem, maintain the ecological balance of the dual airdrop model, and reward members who actively participate in community building, we are officially launching a limited-time staking incentive campaign!
📅 Campaign Period: July 21, 2026 – August 21, 2026
🎁Campaign Rewards
1️⃣ Users participating in VVS s…
🟦 VAPP Third-party Security Audit Completed✅
✅ Audit focus includes:
✅ Smart contract code security
✅ Fund protection logic
✅ Access control mechanism
✅ Staking and automated execution process
✅ Potential security risk analysis
VAPP has completed an independent third-party security audit and has been verified to be operating in accordance with its design code rules. To ensure the security of user funds, the source c…
🛡 How Does VAPP Safeguard User Assets?
The core value of Web3 decentralization lies in shifting trust from human promises to technological rules. Through its asset protection protocol, VeriVault Chain establishes a more secure participation mechanism for users.
After users stake assets
👇
Assets enter the VAPP
(Third-party security audit)
👇
Automatically execute according to protocol…
🔥91❤51👍28👏6
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @VeriVaultNetworks1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 29,386 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 22 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Kwtcn Wallet (VERV)” (@VeriVaultNetworks1), 66,294 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VeriVaultNetworks1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
