Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Real Madrid vs Valencia 📺

Channel

Real Madrid vs Valencia 📺

@VerFutbol2

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

43,117subscribers

-763 since we began measuring on 8 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002602389145
TypeChannel
Username@VerFutbol2
Description🇪🇸 Canal para ver fútbol gratis HD 🗞 Contenido y partidos en directo 🔥 Toda la actualidad deportiva actual 📩 Contacto: @FutbolEnPrimera 🔗 https://t.me/+p0f1MxOND_5jZjhk
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 September 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/VerFutbol2

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

42,76343,88043,321.58 September 2026 — 43,880 subscribers8 September 2026 — 43,880 subscribers11 September 2026 — 43,795 subscribers13 September 2026 — 43,746 subscribers15 September 2026 — 43,683 subscribers17 September 2026 — 43,667 subscribers19 September 2026 — 43,557 subscribers26 September 2026 — 43,456 subscribers4 October 2026 — 43,143 subscribers8 October 2026 — 42,992 subscribers13 October 2026 — 42,896 subscribers14 October 2026 — 42,928 subscribers15 October 2026 — 42,913 subscribers16 October 2026 — 42,858 subscribers17 October 2026 — 42,821 subscribers18 October 2026 — 42,875 subscribers19 October 2026 — 42,874 subscribers20 October 2026 — 42,956 subscribers22 October 2026 — 42,904 subscribers22 October 2026 — 42,856 subscribers24 October 2026 — 42,812 subscribers25 October 2026 — 42,763 subscribers26 October 2026 — 43,806 subscribers27 October 2026 — 43,633 subscribers28 October 2026 — 43,556 subscribers29 October 2026 — 43,500 subscribers30 October 2026 — 43,451 subscribers31 October 2026 — 43,411 subscribers1 November 2026 — 43,359 subscribers2 November 2026 — 43,297 subscribers3 November 2026 — 43,242 subscribers4 November 2026 — 43,203 subscribers5 November 2026 — 43,153 subscribers6 November 2026 — 43,117 subscribers43,1178 September 20266 November 2026
34 measurements spanning 58 days, net -763. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 42,595–44,048 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 03:2643,117-36
5 Nov 2026, 05:1743,153-50
4 Nov 2026, 05:1643,203-39
3 Nov 2026, 07:5943,242-55
2 Nov 2026, 04:3743,297-62
1 Nov 2026, 01:2943,359-52
31 Oct 2026, 02:5943,411-40
30 Oct 2026, 04:2743,451-49
29 Oct 2026, 04:2843,500-56
28 Oct 2026, 00:4543,556-77
27 Oct 2026, 00:0843,633-173
26 Oct 2026, 02:2043,806+1,043
25 Oct 2026, 02:5642,763-49
24 Oct 2026, 02:5442,812-44
22 Oct 2026, 23:4042,856-48
22 Oct 2026, 00:3642,904-52
20 Oct 2026, 19:2942,956+82
19 Oct 2026, 18:1842,874-1
18 Oct 2026, 16:2842,875+54
17 Oct 2026, 13:0642,821first reading

Engagement

48 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 114 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.11%
avg views ÷ 43,117 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,930
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
16
of 48 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held48 (2 July 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total62,857
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 09:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
212
Links
19

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 10 of 16 posts held from the last 30 days (62.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 16:58 UTC526 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Nos vemos en nada con la jornada de hoy de #UCL 🇪🇺

3 Nov 2026, 20:09 UTC408 viewsread 3 November 2026
Photo

En directo ambos partidos arriba ☝️ ÚNETE YA 😒

3 Nov 2026, 19:45 UTC653 viewsread 3 November 2026
Photo

21:00 | 🔵🔴 Barça 🆚 Aston Villa ⚽ 👉 https://t.me/VerLaChampionsLeague 🇪🇸 (DAZN) ✅ 👉 https://t.me/+ySfNQ3D5hNM5Yzhk 🇪🇸 (DAZN) ✅ 👉 https://t.me/VerFutbol3 (HD) ⭐ Ver toda la Champions GRATIS: https://t.me/VerFutbolGratis2026ES 🔴

1 Nov 2026, 11:46 UTC≈1,700 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Victoria cómoda del Real Madrid ante el Racing de Santander 🟥✅

31 Oct 2026, 15:56 UTC≈1,730 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

El FC Barcelona vuelve a la senda de la victoria a lo grande ⚽️⚽️

25 Oct 2026, 22:20 UTC≈2,000 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

SORPRESA EN EL CAMP NOU 🔥 El Real Madrid de Mourinho se impone por 1-2 al todopoderoso Barça de Hansi Flick. Un gol de Rapinha y dos de Mbappé cerraban el partido ⭐️🇪🇸

25 Oct 2026, 16:36 UTC≈10,400 viewsread 6 November 2026
Poll

Ganador de El Clásico de hoy ⭐️

  1. FC Barcelona ⚽️51%
  2. Real Madrid ⚽️52%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

25 Oct 2026, 16:35 UTC≈7,530 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Preparen sus palomitas, nos vemos a las 21:00 🇪🇸

21 Oct 2026, 17:45 UTC≈5,620 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Buen partido de dominancia del Real Madrid ⚽️✅

20 Oct 2026, 16:11 UTC≈6,030 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

✅ El PSG está imparable y golea al Manchester City y FC Barcelona, equipos que están invictos en sus respectivas ligas 💀

18 Oct 2026, 16:32 UTC≈5,180 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

El Real Madrid consigue una victoria firme ante el Sevilla sin Vinicius Jr 👀 Marcaron Arda Güler, Mbappé (2) y Diomandé ✅

Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @VerFutbol2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@VerFutbol2 edited 13 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
14 September 2026
Most recent edit
4 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 7 posts on @VerFutbol2 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
18 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
3 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
5 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
3

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

25 Oct 2026, 16:36 UTCAnonymous Poll277 voters

Ganador de El Clásico de hoy ⭐️

  1. FC Barcelona ⚽️51%
  2. Real Madrid ⚽️52%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

15 Sept 2026, 18:21 UTCAnonymous Poll689 voters

Partidazo a las 21:30 🇪🇸

  1. Elche ⚽️18%
  2. Real Madrid ⚽️83%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

13 Sept 2026, 11:29 UTCAnonymous Poll681 voters

Partidazo a las 16:15 ✅

  1. Gana Levante ⚽️17%
  2. Gana FC Barcelona ⚽️84%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Real Madrid vs Valencia 📺” (@VerFutbol2), 43,117 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VerFutbol2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.