Channel
@VelanoTech
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,592subscribers
-93 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001318223347 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @VelanoTech |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/VelanoTech |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 08:37 | 2,592 | -10 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 17:20 | 2,602 | -8 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 04:40 | 2,610 | -5 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 10:21 | 2,615 | -6 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 11:17 | 2,621 | -6 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:13 | 2,627 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 2,632 | -11 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:38 | 2,643 | -8 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 2,651 | -6 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:09 | 2,657 | -9 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:04 | 2,666 | -11 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:24 | 2,677 | -8 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 2,685 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:06 | 2,685 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
16 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 7 | 43.8% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 31.3% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
You only have time for one simulation.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
#HOORAN_VISUALS 02 Mixing looks simple. Physics disagrees. Inside an industrial mixer, performance is determined by what cannot be seen: • Velocity distribution • Recirculation zones • Dead volumes • Shear rates • Mixing uniformity A mixer that appears identical from the outside can behave completely differently on the inside. Some regions mix rapidly. Others barely move. Some consume more energy than necessa…
❤3👍1
#BEFORE_REALITY 02 For decades, vacuum cleaners shared the same flaw: The more dust they collected, the less effective they became. Most people accepted it. James Dyson didn't. He believed the problem wasn't inevitable. The design was. What followed was not a breakthrough idea or a sudden moment of inspiration. It was thousands of failures. More than 5,000 prototypes were built before the first Dyson vacuum …
👍3
#Where_It_Shines 🔋 Thermal Management Simulation of Electric Vehicle Batteries In battery systems, temperature is more than just a number. It is a key factor that determines performance, lifetime, and safety. Non-uniform temperature distribution inside a battery pack can reduce efficiency, accelerate degradation, shorten battery life, and in critical conditions, lead to thermal runaway. Using CFD and OpenFOAM®, e…
🔥2
You can measure only one thing.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔥2
🔗 Stay Connected Instagram | LinkedIn | Telegram
#HOORAN_VISUALS 01 Inside a cyclone separator, there are no moving parts. No filters. No complex mechanisms. Only geometry and fluid physics. As the flow enters tangentially, a powerful vortex develops inside the chamber. Centrifugal forces drive particles toward the wall, while cleaner air moves toward the core and exits through the vortex finder. The engineering challenge is simple to describe but difficult t…
👍3
#BEFORE_REALITY 01 Imagine discovering a critical design flaw... after manufacturing. For aerospace engineers, this was once common. A small cooling issue inside a turbine blade could mean months of redesign, testing, and costly prototype changes. Then engineering changed. Instead of testing ideas only in the real world, engineers began testing them inside computers. Airflow became visible. Heat transfer beca…
❤2
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @VelanoTech. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
You only have time for one simulation.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
You can measure only one thing.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“VelanoTech” (@VelanoTech), 2,592 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VelanoTech.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.