Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝒱𝒶𝓃ℯ𝓈𝓈𝒶 ℛ𝒾𝒹𝒹𝓁ℯ|ᵈᶦᵃʳʸ

@VanessaRiddle

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

4subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002150450288
TypeChannel
Username@VanessaRiddle
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/VanessaRiddle

Growth

411 August 2026 — 4 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4 subscribers11 August 202613 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3–5 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 05:474no change
11 Aug 2026, 07:154first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 22 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
9
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

14 reactions across 5 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
535.7%
🔥535.7%
🤩321.4%
🥰17.14%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 March 2026 to 1 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Apr 2026, 09:08 UTC21 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @platinumashes_dmdiaryPhoto

🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 🖤🖤🖤 🖤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🖤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🖤 Здравствуйте! Хоть вы и не знали,но даже сами принцы могу вести свои скрытые помыслы и прятать их от всех неприступных лиц человечества. Я не говорю,что многие читают чужие записи,а главное то,что им интересно узнавать многое о самой личности, а именно обо мне. 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 Как вы уже поняли,то добро пожаловать в дневник самого аристократичного нарцисса, а именно Драко Малфоя. Зде

24 Mar 2026, 16:10 UTC32 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026

๑╰──𓈒ִ 𝅄─‌ « ᨳ ഒ » ─ ۫. 𝂅 ─‌─ׄ╮ִ๑ New Post by Vanessa Riddle Что ж, и снова вечера, магглы и не только. Я недавно сходила в Хогсмид и прикупила себе книги о заклинаниях, Мерлин, я так устала. И хоть я рода чистокровных волшебниц, я в тайне хожу на то самое озеро. Каждый раз, когда я оказываюсь у его берегов, меня охватывает странное чувство. Оно смешивается с волнением и

1🔥1🤩1

24 Mar 2026, 05:22 UTC32 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

๑╰──𓈒ִ 𝅄─‌ « ᨳ ഒ » ─ ۫. 𝂅 ─‌─ׄ╮ִ๑ New Post by Vanessa Riddle И всем не доброго утра, Слизерин. Я встала с кровати не с той ноги, и пошла делать себе кофе чтобы с бодриться. Опять уроки, ненавижу всё это. Почему мой отец отправил меня учиться сюда?! Не где нибудь в Англии и т.д. а именно в эту жалкую школу волшебства?! Пойду готовится, и может спрошу у Малфоя какие будут с

1🔥1🤩1

23 Mar 2026, 12:38 UTC35 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026

๑╰──𓈒ִ 𝅄─‌ « ᨳ ഒ » ─ ۫. 𝂅 ─‌─ׄ╮ִ๑ New Post by Vanessa Riddle Мне не важна репутация, если даже магглы на Гриффиндоре. Мне важна гордость и ум Слизерина, так как я часть их компании. Ведь истинная ценность определяется не мнением толпы, а внутренней силой и благородством происхождения. Слизерин – это не просто факультет, это символ остроты ума, амбиций и несгибаемой воли.

1🔥1🤩1

23 Mar 2026, 09:52 UTC29 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026

๑╰──𓈒ִ 𝅄─‌ « ᨳ ഒ » ─ ۫. 𝂅 ─‌─ׄ╮ִ๑ New Post by Vanessa Riddle Этот, детский смех...так раздражает! Не могу больше это слушать. Пойду в библиотеку там спокойнее, что ж даже Поттер со своими дружками не так плох он на дуэли уделал Малфоя. Ну это не означает что я за него радуюсь, это всё чушь и бред несусменый! Надеюсь я не заражусь тупостью Поттера, на взгляд он такой же жа

1🔥1

23 Mar 2026, 09:01 UTC29 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

๑╰──𓈒ִ 𝅄─‌ « ᨳ ഒ » ─ ۫. 𝂅 ─‌─ׄ╮ִ๑ New Post by Vanessa Riddle Это моя первая запись...да не хотела я сюда писать но меня заставили... Кхм..как вы уже поняли я Ванесса Реддл, дочь поганого отца Тома Реддла. Мы надеюсь будем с вами частны? И тут не будет поганных магглловских грязнокровок и полукровок, не поймите меня не правильно. Лес был однако спокойный и без этих мерзких

1🔥1🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @VanessaRiddle. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,308,296 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝒱𝒶𝓃ℯ𝓈𝓈𝒶 ℛ𝒾𝒹𝒹𝓁ℯ|ᵈᶦᵃʳʸ” (@VanessaRiddle), 4 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VanessaRiddle.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.