Channel
@Valiantsdao
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
347subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001785763869 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Valiantsdao |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Valiantsdao |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 04:34 | 347 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:17 | 349 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:06 | 349 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 December 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 April 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
139 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 80 | 57.6% | |
| 🔥 | 54 | 38.8% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 2.88% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.719% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 139reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 December 2023 to 19 April 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Eating a zero. @Keepeeeeer you are subscriber N 1000, send me your wallet, I will send you 1000 RuneBridge , best Runes token (0.08 ETH worth at now)
❤2👍2
Congrats @exorcizamus89 for bridging 1000 subs. Big milestone for you. Shows that hardwork and consistency pays off.
[Presale filled] Congrats to our vice chairman BLC and DESME/Angels AI CEO for filling a 15ETH presale. We hope DAO members who have been long term investors also enjoyed participating. Valiants strong!
🔥7❤1
AMA Announcement : 📣📣📣 Telegram Monk is excited to announce our first official AMA. 📣📣📣 📌When? Monday 5PM UTC 📍Where? The private Valiants DAO AMA Group During the AMA we will talk about our project and its future developments but not only that....At the same time our first NFT collection will be launched and we will explain the usefulness they will have in our ecosystem. 🚀Save the date because it will be epic.🚀…
🔥3❤1
Some story about success with Valiants. Remember, even 0.3 bnb can be important. Don’t give up. This story was made in bear market, now you have more chances
If you put 💩 and ask why I ape 0.3 bnb in shit while invest 1 ETH in presales, I have answer. When I started this channel in late 2022 I had 4 subscribers and only after taking part in trading competition https://t.me/Valiantsdao I got subscribers. I did not have even 0.5 ETH in 2022 and aped BSC presales 0.3-0.5 bnb. Then I converted all in ETH and aped all in in shibarium related token with something like x5 when j…
❤5
Order of the Whale, Rank: Grand Officer Whale: @lapdecab Citation: BLC hails from one of France's most esteemed financial institutions. Amidst a daunting bear market, he committed himself to mastering DeFi, transforming from a novice few years ago into one of the field's leading experts. His rapid ascension also includes an appointment as the vice-chairman position on the dao as well as an associate professor, educat…
❤8
Order of the Whale, Rank: Grand Officer Whale: @rakskuld Citation: @rakskuld has been a cornerstone member of the DAO since the early days of the pre-DAO era, tracing back to the Kronos chain era. He's consistently demonstrated remarkable honesty and integrity. His contributions have been invaluable, often bringing innovative projects to the DAO's attention and actively networking within the community. Remarkably, he…
❤6🔥1
Order of the Whale, Rank: Grand Officer Whale: @exorcizamus89 Citation: Where so many have failed, he has been able to make it his livelihood. So few words are capable of describing the talent of one man, @exorcizamus89. Sheer discipline and mental focus have enabled him to be a profitable full-time trader during the bear market, which we all know is very challenging. Furthermore, he has achieved this without comprom…
❤6🔥3
Order of the Whale, Rank: Grand Officer Whale: @RioSukarya Citation: Rio was the first project owner that the DAO attempted to assist with an impressive Discuss project. Rio started as a project owner and evolved into a close friend with an unwavering loyalty to the cause. His remarkable dedication not only led him to become the owner of one of Indonesia's largest DeFi communities but also positioned him as a key tra…
🔥7❤2
Tomorrow will be rewarded the Grand Officers, these are the members who made an extremely significant impact to the dao by giving it a considerable amount of their time and energy, and enabling it to survive pass this bear market. To these great whales the dao is forever greatful!
❤9
Order of the Whale, Rank: Commander Whale: @nev182 Citation: As one of the DAO's original members, @nev182 has been an exceptionally active member and an outstanding trader, notably as one of the first at Monte Bianco. Significantly, his contributions in supporting members dealing with mental distress during the bear market, a time marked by substantial financial losses for many, stand out. Nev's quick thinking and e…
🔥9❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Valiantsdao. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 317,291 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Valiantsdao named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Valiants DAO” (@Valiantsdao), 347 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Valiantsdao.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.