OPEN JASA PUSH GC ATAU CH PAKAI BOT FSUB BUKAN SUNTIKAN, MEMBER AKTIF REAL BUKAN BOT ATAU AKUN MATI, PER 1K HARGA 50K, MINAT PC @sayabara
π1π1π₯°1

Channel
@VStreid
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Stars Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry
16,832subscribers
-253 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000β31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002060678260 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @VStreid |
| Description | Selling all kinds of telegram needs |
| Created | 25 January 2024 β measured β dated from the channelβs first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/VStreid |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:14 | 16,832 | -11 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 01:32 | 16,843 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 22:22 | 16,844 | -23 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 00:22 | 16,867 | -21 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 16,888 | -35 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 16,923 | -20 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 16,943 | -23 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:15 | 16,966 | -5 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:43 | 16,971 | -23 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:08 | 16,994 | -22 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:18 | 17,016 | -19 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:50 | 17,035 | -29 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 17,064 | -21 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:33 | 17,085 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 17,085 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 25 January 2024 β the reader has reached the start of this channelβs public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 31 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (25 January 2024 β 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 323 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 22:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 22 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
8,595 reactions across 15 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π₯ | 2,385 | 27.7% | |
| β€ | 2,260 | 26.3% | |
| π | 2,026 | 23.6% | |
| π― | 743 | 8.64% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 599 | 6.97% | |
| π | 273 | 3.18% | |
| π | 236 | 2.75% | |
| π± | 37 | 0.43% | |
| β‘ | 11 | 0.128% | |
| π€© | 11 | 0.128% | |
| π | 5 | 0.058% | |
| π | 5 | 0.058% | |
| π₯° | 3 | 0.035% | |
| π | 1 | 0.012% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 8,595reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 25 January 2024 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars β bought with money β on a post by @VStreid. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 January 2024 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramβs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
OPEN JASA PUSH GC ATAU CH PAKAI BOT FSUB BUKAN SUNTIKAN, MEMBER AKTIF REAL BUKAN BOT ATAU AKUN MATI, PER 1K HARGA 50K, MINAT PC @sayabara
π1π1π₯°1
ββ° ββ ππ¨π§π’ ππ¨πππ ββ β± β β⬀ button dibawah ini telah di atur menjadi auto arah, anda perlu mengklik saja salah satu menu di bawah ini untuk anda gunakan sebagai sarana literasi . κ°ππΌπππ ππππππππ κ°
β‘οΈ
π€©7
β¨
π6
π₯
π₯7β‘2π2π₯°2π€©1
π΅π²ππππΎ pinned Β«π OPEN READY USERBOT Userbot Satuan βοΈ 1 Bulan : Rp. 25.000 βοΈ 3 Bulan : Rp. 60.000 UserBot 1 Private / Sewa Jasa Repo βοΈ 10 User : Rp. 130.000 βοΈ 15 User : Rp. 180.000 βοΈ 20 User : Rp. 220.000 βοΈ 30 User : Rp. 260.000 βοΈ 40 User : Rp. 300.000 βοΈ 50 Userβ¦Β»
β‘οΈ
π14β‘3π3
π OPEN READY USERBOT Userbot Satuan βοΈ 1 Bulan : Rp. 25.000 βοΈ 3 Bulan : Rp. 60.000 UserBot 1 Private / Sewa Jasa Repo βοΈ 10 User : Rp. 130.000 βοΈ 15 User : Rp. 180.000 βοΈ 20 User : Rp. 220.000 βοΈ 30 User : Rp. 260.000 βοΈ 40 User : Rp. 300.000 βοΈ 50 User : Rp. 360.000 βοΈ Unlimited : Rp. 400.000 Note : Yang udah berlangganan beda harga sama yang baru beli AntiGcast Only βοΈPricelist : Rp 50.000/bulan Bot Music Freeβ¦
π₯2,100π1,650π―741β€βπ₯597π3π1
π₯
π10
π₯
π7
OPEN TELEGRAM PREMIUM Via Login β Full Waranty π1 Bulan : Rp 55.000 No Indo π1 Bulan : Rp 60.000 No Luar π12 Bulan : Rp 410.000 No Indo π12 Bulan : Rp 430.000 No Luar Via Gifts β Full Waranty π3 Bulan : Rp 230.000 π6 Bulan : Rp 290.000 π12 Bulan : Rp 500.000 β’ Langsung drop link after payment β’ Data & Privasi aman 100% β’ All no warranty so buy with ur own risk
π19π±12
π
π3π±3π₯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @VStreid. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions β Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank β 62,277 of 1,584,142entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@VStreid named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel β we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπ΅π²ππππΎβ (@VStreid), 16,832 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VStreid.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.