Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Лучшее

Channel

Лучшее

@VLONE55

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,491subscribers

-21 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002451537851
TypeChannel
Username@VLONE55
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/VLONE55

Growth

1,4911,5121,501.58 August 2026 — 1,512 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,510 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,494 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,491 subscribers8 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net -21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,488–1,515 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 16:461,491-3
12 Aug 2026, 01:021,494-16
8 Aug 2026, 17:371,510-2
8 Aug 2026, 02:331,512first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 20 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.61%
avg views ÷ 1,491 subscribers
Avg views / post
24.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held19 (20 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total24
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 02:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

32,384 reactions across 18 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 50715718578497143115,17216.0%
custom 53391928978560846575,17216.0%
custom 53033094296455214175,10115.8%
custom 58507131347586333371,3584.19%
custom 51953097153236283631,1823.65%
custom 53350606840508221261,1783.64%
custom 53012352868590667401,1583.58%
custom 53303654343927477251,1553.57%
custom 58483510315948521481,1233.47%
custom 57940479862500294321,1033.41%
custom 54473727087466562391,0933.38%
custom 54268567666651544211,0723.31%
custom 53346846167143825811,0673.29%
custom 57715509303737112841,0103.12%
custom 59766981491865742487062.18%
custom 57741284648020922733351.03%
custom 59763029864255356133190.985%
custom 49093558822921849982230.689%
custom 53864494265815761962030.627%
custom 50714597849730935821940.599%
19 further kinds2,4607.60%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32,384reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 19 we hold a reading for · 32%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @VLONE55. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 17:58 UTC24 viewsread 8 August 2026

https://meet.google.com/xht-mgks-wbm هرکس دوست داره بیاد🤩

Signed ㅤسـولـے

17 Jul 2026, 12:45 UTC439 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🗯🗯🗯

custom 54655742776359212949custom 61005964065091180596custom 54338418094175938464

Signed хадж соли бродяга

11 Jul 2026, 06:23 UTC≈1,770 views198 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ты никогда не пересечешь океан, если💀

custom 546557427763592129474custom 543384180941759384669custom 610059640650911805955

Signed хадж соли бродяга

10 Jul 2026, 12:36 UTC≈1,610 views1,398 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 5303309429645521417479custom 5071571857849714311461custom 5339192897856084657458

Signed хадж соли

9 Jul 2026, 07:15 UTC≈4,700 views1,125 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

I know I'm screwed this year.😈

custom 5339192897856084657387custom 5071571857849714311371custom 5303309429645521417367

Signed хадж соли

7 Jul 2026, 11:13 UTC≈8,780 views11,750 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 50715718578497143113,950custom 53391928978560846573,930custom 53033094296455214173,870

Signed хадж соли

6 Jul 2026, 20:05 UTC≈2,280 views1,170 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

I fell in love with your eyes, but they aren't mine anymore...❤️

custom 5339192897856084657396custom 5071571857849714311390custom 5303309429645521417384

Signed хадж соли

5 Jul 2026, 18:08 UTC≈1,980 views804 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Don't trust girls.❤️

custom 4909355882292184998223custom 5386449426581576196203custom 5071459784973093582191custom 5071567000241702643186custom 53391928978560846571

Signed хадж соли

3 Jul 2026, 16:47 UTC≈1,670 views579 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Just have a good time and don't worry about anyone else.🕷️

custom 5850713134758633337203custom 5976698149186574248197custom 5771550930373711284176custom 50714597849730935823

Signed хадж соли

2 Jul 2026, 18:00 UTC≈1,760 views817 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

♟️

custom 5850713134758633337297custom 5771550930373711284260custom 5976698149186574248260

Signed хадж соли

1 Jul 2026, 15:07 UTC≈2,140 views751 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

حرفی ندارم تو دنیای گوهی داریم زندگی می‌کنیم 😁

custom 5771550930373711284260custom 5976698149186574248244custom 5850713134758633337243custom 57741284648020922733custom 53033094296455214171

Signed хадж соли

30 Jun 2026, 12:31 UTC≈1,730 views609 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

😴🌀

custom 5850713134758633337180custom 5976302986425535613149custom 5774128464802092273146custom 5771550930373711284134

Signed dᵢyₐₙₐ

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @VLONE55. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 611,618 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Лучшее” (@VLONE55), 1,491 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VLONE55.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.