Аааааааа У меня, кстати, все переигралось и я уже дома 😆😆😆
❤22🔥8👍4

Channel
@VHQDnOFF
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,266subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001908866588 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @VHQDnOFF |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 30 November 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/VHQDnOFF |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:43 | 1,266 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:30 | 1,266 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 30 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (30 May 2026 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,557 |
| Reactions total | 87 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
414 reactions across 16 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 158 | 38.2% | |
| 😁 | 53 | 12.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 33 | 7.97% | |
| 🤣 | 32 | 7.73% | |
| 🔥 | 29 | 7.00% | |
| 🙏 | 24 | 5.80% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 3.38% | |
| 💔 | 12 | 2.90% | |
| 🕊 | 12 | 2.90% | |
| 🫡 | 9 | 2.17% | |
| 😢 | 8 | 1.93% | |
| 🤡 | 6 | 1.45% | |
| 💘 | 5 | 1.21% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 1.21% | |
| 👀 | 4 | 0.966% | |
| 🥴 | 4 | 0.966% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 0.725% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.483% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.242% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 414reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Аааааааа У меня, кстати, все переигралось и я уже дома 😆😆😆
❤22🔥8👍4
А когда Зеленского официально признают террористом и экстремистом? И сейчас такой Росфинмониторинг: «А ой…Так мы это… Ну…»
😁15🥴4🤡1
А я совсем скоро в отпуск 🥳 Начинаем считать дни! Никита будет дома через: 24 дня 🤪
❤15👍9🔥9
А вообще почему я спросил разрешения? Мой канал! Что хочу, то и пишу! 🤪
❤18😁9🥰5❤🔥2
А можно я выскажусь? Мне кажется, что современных детей очень сильно опекают и прям укутывают в «безопасный режим», как только он начинает более-менее осознанно коммуницировать с обществом. Вот мое детство… Я дрался крапивой, падал с гаражей, 2 раза мне зашивали голову и один раз не зашивали, потому что я боялся врачей (и боюсь). Сколько было случаев, когда я получал шишку: драки в школе, драки на улице и так дале…
❤32
У Минпроса очень много свободного времени?
❤8🤣6💯3
Давно не рассказывал, что сейчас вообще происходит у меня. Все хорошо, все нормально. Обстановка вокруг стабильно-напряженная. Работаем в штатном режиме и на благо Родины. Без подробностей и деталей. Но очень стараемся приблизить нашу Победу. Недавно прочитал один короткий спитч от одного известно в военных кругах человека: «Вот меня, к счастью редко, но бывает, что спрашивают: «А ты убивал на войне?». Вот такое може…
❤🔥11😢8👀4🔥4
Ягодный антикриз от «сложных» новостей. Я бы еще добавил, что здоровому человеку запрещено пробовать попасть косточкой в стаканчик. Так как можно подавиться.
😁4❤3
25 сезонов на ТНТ и никто нас не предупредил о том,что грядет. Может надо было Зеленского посадить в багажник, пока он не перепрофилировался в президентика? Вместе с той самой летучей мышью. Обманщики.
🤣16🤡5🔥3😁2
Братья, с праздником нас! С Днем ветерана боевых действий. Кто-то заслужил это звание много лет назад, а кто-то кует его прямо сейчас на передке. Но суть одна: каждый из нас знает цену жизни и настоящую цену тишины. Спасибо каждому, кто стоял и стоит до конца за свою Родину, за свое прошлое, настоящее и будущее. Желаю, чтобы здоровье не подводило, чтобы дома всегда ждали и понимали, а в душе был лад. Тем, кто сейч…
❤17🫡9🕊7🙏4
Шок-контент. Министр экономразвития открыл нам глаза: зумеры, оказывается, не горят желанием сидеть на работе до ночи. Вот главное из свежего интервью: 1. Зумеров сложно вовлекать в занятость. 2. В течение года большинство меняет работу. 3. Запросы: адекватный коллектив, кофе, спорт, чёткое рабочее время без переработок. Бизнес жалуется, а Решетников называет это «новой реальностью, с которой надо работать». Опрос с…
🤣10🔥5❤2👍1
Posted without readable text
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @VHQDnOFF. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Кто куда?
The shares total 127%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2026 to 2 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Заметки Пионера 🇷🇺” (@VHQDnOFF), 1,266 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VHQDnOFF.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.