Channel
@VE_LASHES
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
52subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004439720114 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @VE_LASHES |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 18 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/VE_LASHES |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 1 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Oct 2026, 17:38 | 52 | -1 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 17:40 | 53 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:07 | 52 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:15 | 51 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:01 | 51 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
49 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 29 | 59.2% | |
| 🤩 | 14 | 28.6% | |
| 😍 | 5 | 10.2% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 2.04% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сегодня я хочу поделиться важным инсайтом о нашей работе. Ко мне во второй раз пришла девочка на наращивание. И знаете что самое приятное? Она попросила сделать абсолютно такие же реснички, как в прошлый раз Девочки, это лучший комплимент мастеру💓 Это значит, что вам было не просто красиво, а еще и комфортно. Если вы всё ещё думаете, к кому пойти за своими идеальными ресницами — вот он, знак свыше 😉 Запись открыта…
❤7😍1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤3
Бывают клиентки, которые всю жизнь мечтали о выразительном взгляде и ярких ресницах. Она всегда хотела красить их тушью, чтобы глаза были заметны, ведь когда реснички «теряются» — это не про её стиль. И вот наконец-то она решилась на наращивание! Мы создали для неё максимально натуральный эффект: взгляд стал глубоким, а ресницы — ухоженными и аккуратными😍 Теперь каждое утро начинается с улыбки: смотреть на себя в з…
😍4🤩1
Девчонки, я обновила прайс ☺️
Сегодня впервые делала эффект Lami! 🌸 Это моя первая работа с этим эффектом, и я очень довольна результатом. Реснички выглядят невероятно нежно, естественно и по-летнему свежо! Такой эффект скоро появится в моём прайсе, но уже сейчас можно записаться ко мне на наращивание Lami. Буду рада видеть вас на этой новой услуге 😚
❤7🤩2
Video, posted without a caption
❤6🤩2
Дорогие клиенты, сообщаю: 12 августа я уезжаю в отпуск и вернусь только к 28-му. В этот же день (28 августа) уже можно будет записаться ко мне на наращивание ресниц — чтобы ваши глазки были готовы к началу сентября! Сейчас заняты только 4 и 6 число, все остальные даты свободны для записи 😉 Жду всех за красотой после возвращения!🫦🖤 @vika3055
❤3🤗1
🖤Идеальная носка классики Реснички прожили 20 дней, выпаданий замечено не было, часто купались в речке и почти не расчесывались Жду вас у себя, сделаем красивые и долговечные реснички😚 @vika3055
❤2🤩1
🖤Ищу модель для наращивания в эффекте ламинирования — всего 400₽ за материалы! Впервые буду делать наращивание ресниц именно в технике «эффект ламинирования» и ищу моделей, чтобы улучшить свои навыки. Это отличная возможность для вас, попробовать популярную процедуру по минимальной цене. Что входит: - наращивание в стиле ламинирования; - все качественные расходные материалы включены (стоимость материалов — 400 ру…
🤩5
🖤Вы можете записаться онлайн, перейдя по ссылке https://dikidi.net/2111434
А еще я сделала онлайн запись для вас🤗
https://vk.ru/club240325426 Подписываемся⬆️⬆️⬆️
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @VE_LASHES. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“VE_LASHES” (@VE_LASHES), 52 subscribers as measured 11 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VE_LASHES.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.