Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for VASU HUB

Channel

VASU HUB

@VASUHUB

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

51,809subscribers

+325 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002062810052
TypeChannel
Username@VASUHUB
Description🖤 We strictly do not promote or support any kind of illegal content or activities. All materials shared here are intended for educational, informational, or entertainment purposes only and comply with applicable laws. Users are solely responsible for how
Created18 May 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/VASUHUB

Growth

51,46651,80951,637.514 August 2026 — 51,484 subscribers15 August 2026 — 51,485 subscribers16 August 2026 — 51,489 subscribers17 August 2026 — 51,466 subscribers18 August 2026 — 51,500 subscribers19 August 2026 — 51,518 subscribers20 August 2026 — 51,524 subscribers22 August 2026 — 51,619 subscribers23 August 2026 — 51,659 subscribers25 August 2026 — 51,654 subscribers26 August 2026 — 51,624 subscribers27 August 2026 — 51,623 subscribers28 August 2026 — 51,604 subscribers29 August 2026 — 51,735 subscribers30 August 2026 — 51,809 subscribers14 August 202630 August 2026
15 measurements spanning 16 days, net +325. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 51,415–51,860 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 10:2751,809+74
29 Aug 2026, 08:2651,735+131
28 Aug 2026, 07:5851,604-19
27 Aug 2026, 06:3751,623-1
26 Aug 2026, 03:2851,624-30
25 Aug 2026, 01:1851,654-5
23 Aug 2026, 15:1451,659+40
22 Aug 2026, 01:4351,619+95
20 Aug 2026, 22:3351,524+6
19 Aug 2026, 19:4351,518+18
18 Aug 2026, 20:4751,500+34
17 Aug 2026, 20:4551,466-23
16 Aug 2026, 18:2851,489+4
15 Aug 2026, 04:5551,485+1
14 Aug 2026, 16:4551,484first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 18 May 2024the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 34 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.28%
avg views ÷ 51,809 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,250
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.26%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026
Posts held19 (18 May 202430 August 2026)
Views total19,510
Reactions total48
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1,118 reactions across 17 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
75867.8%
👍887.87%
🥰716.35%
🔥615.46%
🤯353.13%
🗿343.04%
🤩343.04%
🎉201.79%
👌80.716%
❤‍🔥70.626%
😍20.179%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,118reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2024 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 18 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @VASUHUB. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 May 2024 to 30 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Aug 2026, 11:33 UTC250 views1 reactionsread 30 August 2026

22 Hours left only ⏰🔜 Refer more to secure your position ✅

1

Signed VムS U

28 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC≈1,000 views12 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Forwarded from @DDXOTP

🔥🔥🔥 Giveaway 🎁🔘 Telegram Premium 6M ✈️ 1x Telegram account ✈️ Bot 🔗 - @DDXOTPBOT ✅ Steps - 1. Start Bot 2. Get refferal Link 3. Share and earn points 4. Person with highest point wins Telegram Premium 6M 5. 2nd person wins 1 Telegram account

🔥64🤯2

Signed VムS U

25 Aug 2026, 17:32 UTC≈2,550 views9 reactionsread 30 August 2026

Finding a new earning method for you... 🥰 If you have a method and are looking for something, please let me know. I am willing to help you. I want to establish a foundation for earning so that everyone can make good money. Mencari metode penghasilan baru untuk Anda... Jika Anda memiliki metode dan sedang mencari sesuatu, silakan beri tahu saya. Saya bersedia membantu Anda. Saya ingin membangun fondasi untuk meng

5👍4

Signed VムS U

12 Aug 2026, 05:09 UTC≈7,530 views24 reactionsread 30 August 2026

Please Vote... I'm building an earning bot so you can earn from it 🤞 🔜🔜

16🤯8

Signed VムS U

12 Aug 2026, 05:04 UTC≈7,110 views2 reactionsread 30 August 2026

Posted without readable text

2

Signed VムS U

8 Jul 2026, 10:19 UTC≈15,900 views94 reactionsread 30 August 2026

Hello Dear Friends 👋 WhatsApp has too many problems logging in. I was trying to find new numbers that don't have any red error or 1-hour problems, but I can't. This is because WhatsApp updated its policy and upgraded security, so almost 70% of users are not able to log into new numbers. But our main motive is earning money and we will! We will earn from Instagram. I will share full details soon on YouTube and, if I

62🎉16👍6🗿5🥰4🤯1

Signed VムS U

2 Jul 2026, 02:40 UTC≈15,800 views34 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

🆕 Update :- 💩 Whatsapp introduced 🚬 Username feature for users, now you can add username like telegram. 💲❤️ Store Valuable Usernames so you can sell them later. You can keep names on famous Webseries, Famous Characters, any website or anything that you think it can be valuable 🤑💵

20🗿7🤯7

Signed VムS U

5 Jun 2026, 14:55 UTC≈22,700 views48 reactionsread 30 August 2026

Looking at all your problems, it seems that there is no problem with the bot, all the numbers are correct, it is just that WhatsApp has temporarily blocked this prefix of numbers. Let me try to find new prefix numbers, i need some time and your support, i will find new country or new prefix so you can continue your work. Thanks for your love and support, i will be always grateful for you.

31🗿9🥰8

Signed VムS U

2 Jun 2026, 11:35 UTC≈22,500 views44 reactionsread 30 August 2026

Don't Worry friends don't be sad, i know traffic is low but it's temporary problem. I'm trying to find Best access for you 🤫🧿 Remember - we will earn together 🍸

15🗿13👍8🥰5🎉2🤯1

Signed VムS U

9 Apr 2026, 12:49 UTC≈54,100 views173 reactionsread 30 August 2026

No matter where you’re from, what language you speak, or what time zone you’re in…😍 You chose to be here — and that means everything ❤️ This channel is not just numbers, it’s people from different corners of the world, connected by one space.😊 Thank you for being a part of this journey. 🌍✨ I will be always there for you 😍

130👍20🥰11👌5🤯5🎉2

Signed VムS U

6 Apr 2026, 19:19 UTC≈48,100 views40 reactionsread 30 August 2026

@NokosxBot ✅ @DDxOtpBot ✅

30🤩6👍4

Signed VムS U

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @VASUHUB. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 932,798 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“VASU HUB” (@VASUHUB), 51,809 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/VASUHUB.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.