Channel
@User_Securtx1403
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
7subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002202622851 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @User_Securtx1403 |
| Created | 15 July 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/User_Securtx1403 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 7 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:54 | 7 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 15 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
2 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2024 to 11 October 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
سلام و ارادت دوستان عزیز خواستم یه مورد کلاهبرداری رو بهتون اعلام کنم هواستون باشه حتما بهتون کار میدن بعد اینکه انجام بدی و بفرستی کلا بلاک میکنه و دیگه جوابت رو نمیده نه پول رو پرداخت میکنه و نه جواب میده بعد پیام های خودش رو پاک میکنه و بدترین کارش اینه که از اعتماد من سوءاستفاده کرد با بنده هم همین کارو کرد شات های پیام هم موجوده فقط به کمک شما اکانتش بسته میشه🙏 ممنون میشیم همکاری کنید و اکانتش رو بلاک کنین که دی…
@Karino_admini این اکانت ریپورت کنید 🥹
@Maleka023 @ArshadShamloo این دوتا کلاهبردارن لطفا تا جایی که میتونین پخش کنین🙏
سلام وقتتون بخیر. این شخص کلاه بردار هست کار واسش انجام ندین بعداز خروجی کار بلاکتون میکنه @Amir2o000
❌❌فوری فوری ❌❌ رفقا خیلی مواظب باشید ایشون فیش فیک میفرستن و آگهی و تبلیغ ثبت میکنن از اون آگهی های که هزینه استخدام میگیرند ایشون کلاهبردار هستن همه بلاک کنن تا به تور شما نخوره تازه چت دو طرفه هم پاک میکنه @poshtiiibaany
سلام این مبینا کلاهبردار معروفیه @mobina9064 به اسم کار جذب با کارنت کلاه خیلیارو برداشته. کلی پول به جیب زد ولی یه هزاری به من و بقیه کارجو ها نداد. کاملا آدم بی شخصیت و حرمزادهای هست. لطفا از پذیرش همچین کسی به عنوان کارفرما یا حتی کارجو، خوداری کنید. با تشکر
❤2
کلاه برداری به عنوان کارفرما @admiinnn_ibd6
@sh_2000_f
با آیدی های زیر تاحال درخواست آگهی دادن @sh_2000_f @Mahla00r @Say_mgo @vahed_jazb_hamkar @roza1797 @Posht_ibani @Jcjvgujbc @poshtibani_girl
هیچ آگهی ای راجب به شرکت زرین ورک قرار نمیدهیم به عنوان کلاه بردار به ما معرفی کردند دوستان گرامی هیچ مبلغی به حسابشون وارد نکنید ما در قبال آگهی ها هیچ مسئولیتی نداریم
🔴 شیوه ی انجام کار برای حفظ امنیت کاربران ( لطفا با دقت بخونین تا نیاز به تکرار نباشه) : 1_ توافق سر قیمت توسط دو طرف تو پیوی به صورت کامل (درخواست دهنده و انجام دهنده ) 2_ تشکیل یک گروه و اد شدن طرفین و بنده در آن. 3_ معرفی هرکدام از طرفین و اعلام درخواست دهنده یا انجام دهنده بودن. 4_ اعلام پروژه درخواستی همراه با مبلغ مورد نظر و اعلام زمان مورد نظر توسط فرد درخواست دهنده. 5_ تایید انجام پروژه توسط فرد انجام …
واسط امنیت چیست و روند کاری آن به چه صورت است؟ 1⃣ هزینه توافقی در همان ابتدای کار توسط اگهی دهنده به حساب کانال واریز میشود تا محفوظ بماند. 2⃣ پس از انجام کار و تایید اگهی دهنده هزینه توسط ادمین به حساب انجام دهنده واریز میشود. ⭕️هزینه واسط امنیت بر اساس پروژه بین ۷ تا ۱۵ درصد از مبلغ کل می باشد. آیدی ادمین جهت واسطه گری: @project14_03 با این روش احتمال کلاه برداری را به صفر برسانید 🤫‼️ ------------------------…
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @User_Securtx1403. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@User_Securtx1403 named 13 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🚫امنیت کاربران 🚫” (@User_Securtx1403), 7 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/User_Securtx1403.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.