Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
30 measurements spanning 63 days, net +5,914. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,184–13,817 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
1 Nov 2026, 07:04
10,325
-44
31 Oct 2026, 07:38
10,369
-34
30 Oct 2026, 10:05
10,403
-27
29 Oct 2026, 09:37
10,430
-44
28 Oct 2026, 07:09
10,474
-35
27 Oct 2026, 05:27
10,509
-28
26 Oct 2026, 07:31
10,537
-49
25 Oct 2026, 06:27
10,586
-31
24 Oct 2026, 04:56
10,617
-40
23 Oct 2026, 03:57
10,657
-25
22 Oct 2026, 06:06
10,682
-34
21 Oct 2026, 03:10
10,716
-26
20 Oct 2026, 03:10
10,742
-36
19 Oct 2026, 05:30
10,778
-43
18 Oct 2026, 08:19
10,821
-32
17 Oct 2026, 11:36
10,853
-43
16 Oct 2026, 13:28
10,896
-44
15 Oct 2026, 10:00
10,940
-30
14 Oct 2026, 11:40
10,970
-68
12 Oct 2026, 22:27
11,038
first reading
Engagement
8 posts held, back to 19 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
257 reactions across 6 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
86
33.5%
custom 5208730925482948425
72
28.0%
👍
28
10.9%
😁
22
8.56%
custom 5438327950002921419
18
7.00%
custom 5220214645830230563
7
2.72%
🔥
7
2.72%
🫡
7
2.72%
custom 5204045661623855019
4
1.56%
🎉
4
1.56%
🥰
2
0.778%
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 257 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2025 to 30 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
23
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 6 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @UserRate_NEWS. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 June 2025 to 30 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🛑 THE BIGGEST SCAM DATABASES ARE NOW IN @UserRate_bot 🛑
From now on, every username you send for a rating is first checked against scam😈 databases to help protect you from a bad investment.
🔎How does it work?
🤖You send a username for a rating ▪️ the bot checks it through 🔴@gidbanbot, which combines the biggest scam databases ▪️ if the username is found there, you won’t get a rating. Instead, you’ll get a warning t…
🎉 150,000+ USERS IN 6 MONTHS
It’s been only 6 months since @UserRate_bot launched — and more than 150,000 unique users have already tried it.
👤During this time, we ran only 2 referral events, which brought around 35,000 new users in total.
The rest? That’s you💎
🔎You share @UserRate_bot with friends, share your username ratings and help new people discover the bot.
No constant referral campaigns. Just organic gro…
🔎 WELCOME TO USERRATE NEWS
🔎 @UserRate_bot helps you check how much your @ username might be worth.
🔎 What can UserRate_bot do?
● Check real Fragment sales
● Estimate a username price in TON & USD
● Rate usernames from 1 to 10
● Show their potential, strengths and weaknesses
✅If your username was sold on Fragment before, you’ll see the real sale price. If not, UserRate will estimate its value based on multiple fac…
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @UserRate_NEWS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“UserRate NEWS 🔍” (@UserRate_NEWS), 10,325 subscribers as measured 1 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UserRate_NEWS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
