Channel
@UpworkChina_Scammers
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
104subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002958684069 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @UpworkChina_Scammers |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/UpworkChina_Scammers |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 00:57 | 104 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:45 | 103 | +3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:48 | 100 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:07 | 100 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 27 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
110 reactions across 10 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💩 | 22 | 20.0% | |
| 🤬 | 19 | 17.3% | |
| 🤮 | 18 | 16.4% | |
| 🤣 | 10 | 9.09% | |
| 🤡 | 9 | 8.18% | |
| ❤ | 6 | 5.45% | |
| 😱 | 6 | 5.45% | |
| 🤯 | 6 | 5.45% | |
| 👎 | 5 | 4.55% | |
| 🖕 | 3 | 2.73% | |
| 🤨 | 3 | 2.73% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 1.82% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 0.909% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 110reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 27 March 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A very important message. There is a scammer from Bangladesh active in the groups. He is a middleman, he tries to buy accounts cheaply and sell them on at a higher price. When he is turned down, he immediately claims he has been robbed, but he never pays any money. He has numerous accounts and changes his names. @Jamesjmag, @Kenzonsff, @Novelwingd @SmithENGG @chainrider113 @HimelWin9001, @NovelENG, @NovelITEENG, …
💯2🤬2😱2❤1👎1
This person steals accounts when they want to view a laptop, downloads a copy cookie extension in Chrome, and tries to steal all accounts. @Benjamindev24 +12065900210
😱3🤡2🤬2❤1🤮1
🚨 Main thief’s of Korean Gang: @johnsonjno, @ashlyn1123, @dream00013X, @bogdan_luckyman1, @SerhiiT1995, @danny_dogcat, @AkhmedovJhones, @osmtoken, @dddeee123123, @trust0212. Don’t work with this scammers ❌❌❌ At first, they pay an advance and pretend to be great friends, but then they steal your accounts. Be careful!
🤣6💩4👎1🤮1
@dreamdev127 - idiot and timewaster 🤷🏻♂️
💩3🤬2🤯2🤮1
@johnsonjno - Scammer and thief don’t work. ❌❌❌ Rent 3 accounts from me. When I caught up he already start changing passwords. Stolen 1 my account. Chat he deleted. This is a gang of Asians, they have many TG accounts. First they are very friendly, pay advance and then stolen your accounts when you turn back. Be aware!!!! P.S. Soon I will post all theirs tg nicknames. There are 4-5 persons who have more 3 tg each…
💩4🤡4🤬3🤯3🤮1
@Jamesjmag, @Kenzonsff, @Novelwingd @SmithENGG @chainrider113 @HimelWin9001, @NovelENG, @NovelITEENG, @Novel098 - scammer and idiot Here my conversation with him. Chat he already delete. If he tell that he send me money ask him proofs with TXID and my wallet. 😉
🤨3🤮3👎2🤬2💩1🤣1
@NovelEGG - scammer and idiot. this is idiot waste my time and don’t pay anything. Ask stupid questions 10 times a day. I block him and he post that I’m scammer. 😂 Don’t work ❌❌❌ Most people tell me that he is scammer. Screenshot of chat in my blacklist group.
💩3🖕3👎1
@NiceBlueDev - scammer ❌❌❌ Don’t work. try to steal MEXC from seller - proofs is posting in group https://t.me/upwork66. Already change name - @PowerfullDev, @watersnake0823
💩3🤮3🤬1🤯1
We found one more idiot 🏳️🌈 ID:8549130768 @koi_0419 dispute between the Upwork channel admin and this character. He cries in the chat that he was cheated out of $25, but does not provide any evidence. Refused to provide TXID or a screenshot of the transfer. scammer and liar - do not work!!!
🤮5🤬4🤡3🥴1😱1
Hi everyone, this idiot isn't paying for his account and is wasting your time. Don't deal with him. He thought he'd deleted our conversation. I think he's a scammer. @ole1125. ID 8523549811. And have one more account @ole1453. Totally degenerate Chinese
❤4💩4🤣3🤬3🤮3
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @UpworkChina_Scammers. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@UpworkChina_Scammers named 11 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Little arrow-eyed asian bastards scammers 🏳️🌈” (@UpworkChina_Scammers), 104 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UpworkChina_Scammers.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.