Channel name was changed to «Usmle materials 2026»

Channel
Usmle materials 2026
@Updated_Usmle_materialss
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
7,625subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001147685469 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Updated_Usmle_materialss |
| Description | Welcome to our channel ! *Usmle qbank channel : https://t.me/usmle_qbanks Microbiology: Pathology: @clinical_patho Anatomy: @gross_anatomy Physeo .com videos : @Vid_Physeo_S Admin @med_pros |
| Created | Between 1 May 2017 and 31 July 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Updated_Usmle_materialss |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:54 | 7,625 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:12 | 7,624 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:32 | 7,625 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:00 | 7,624 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:53 | 7,624 | first reading |
Engagement
28 posts held, back to 14 December 2020 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 10.4%
- avg views ÷ 7,625 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 795
- 2 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 28 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 28 (14 December 2020 – 1 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,589 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 24
- Videos
- 55
- Links
- 16
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
🎧 Deep Dive Explainer Is Now Available for Step 2! Learn every question through a natural discussion between two expert hosts 👨⚕️👩⚕️ who explain the clinical reasoning, discuss the important clues, and break down difficult concepts step by step.
🎧 Deep Dive Explainer Is Now Available for Step 2! Learn every question through a natural discussion between two expert hosts 👨⚕️👩⚕️ who explain the clinical reasoning, discuss the important clues, and break down difficult concepts step by step. 📝 Full Transcript Included Read the complete spoken discussion while listening, review important points, and return to any part whenever needed. 🧠 Interactive Mind Map Mode…
🏪 😇😇🥰🥰 🥰😇🥰🥰🥰😇 NOV 😅😇😅😇 You don't need more resources. You need the Right ones. We built MCAT Way to be the end of the search.. 🧠 From Day 1 to White Coat. 🔓 ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ https://t.me/addlist/4YUjzWlMtTQ1ZGZh …
🆘Usmle recalls step 1, 2 and 3 🔝90% repeated questions per block😎 👩🎓Tired of memorizing endless facts for the USMLE exam with no results? 🤩It's time to turn your studying into success with USMLE Recalls! 🥰Say goodbye to stress and frustration, and hello to top scores on the USMLE EXAM. 🤓Join the ranks of our satisfied students and take your first step towards your dream residency today with USMLE Recalls. Enroll…
☄️ 2025 USMLE Recalls: Dominate the Exam! ☄️ Your success is our mission. 🙂 No more stress, no more guesswork. Our proven recall strategies will give you the edge you need to crush the USMLE. 👑 Why settle for average when you can be exceptional? With expert guidance and a tailored approach, you’ll be ready to achieve your highest score yet. 🔥Don’t wait—your future is calling. 👋 Take action now and secure your sp…
☄️ 2025 USMLE Recalls: Dominate the Exam! ☄️ Your success is our mission. 🙂 No more stress, no more guesswork. Our proven recall strategies will give you the edge you need to crush the USMLE. 👑 Why settle for average when you can be exceptional? With expert guidance and a tailored approach, you’ll be ready to achieve your highest score yet. 🔥Don’t wait—your future is calling. 👋 Take action now and secure your sp…
🥳 2025 usmle recalls 🥳 🤩Rock your USMLE exam 🤩 😇Don't let the stress of the exam impact your success any longer. 😇Our proven recall strategies will provide you with the tools you need to confidently and accurately ace the exam . With our expert guidance and personalized approach, you can finally achieve the USMLE score you've been dreaming of😎. 👋Don't wait any longer to take control of your future. Sign up for o…
🥳 2025 usmle recalls 🥳 🤩Rock your USMLE exam 🤩 😇Don't let the stress of the exam impact your success any longer. 😇Our proven recall strategies will provide you with the tools you need to confidently and accurately ace the exam . With our expert guidance and personalized approach, you can finally achieve the USMLE score you've been dreaming of😎. 👋Don't wait any longer to take control of your future. Sign up for o…
A 54-year-old man is brought to the office by his friend because of worsening memory impairment over the past several months. The patient is also withdrawn and not focused during conversations. He is slow to answer questions or carry out instructions. The patient has a prolonged history of HIV infection and has had several opportunistic infections due to inconsistent antiretroviral medication use. On physical examina…
Which NBME would you like to get first?
- NBME 1835%
- Nbme 2516%
- Nbme 2611%
- Nbme 277%
- Nbme 285%
- NBME 294%
- NBME 3021%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Would you like to get free online NBME?
- Yes97%
- No3%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @Updated_Usmle_materialss. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Which NBME would you like to get first?
- NBME 1835%
- Nbme 2516%
- Nbme 2611%
- Nbme 277%
- Nbme 285%
- NBME 294%
- NBME 3021%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which step are you preparing?
- Step 186%
- Step 211%
- Step 33%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Would you like to get free online NBME?
- Yes97%
- No3%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
50. An amputated foot of a diabetic will most likely show:
- a) Neoplasia3%
- b) Gangrenous Necrosis84%
- c) Coagulopathy5%
- d) Hemosiderosis4%
- e) Caseation5%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
42. A burn wound characterized by the absence of painful sensation, bleeding, or capillary refilling is best classified as:
- □First degree18%
- □Moderate to severe17%
- □Second degree18%
- □Midlevel3%
- Full thickness44%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 14 December 2020 to 1 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 7,020 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Usmle materials 2026” (@Updated_Usmle_materialss), 7,625 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Updated_Usmle_materialss.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.