Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for UFC 333 - UNIVERSO MMA

Channel

UFC 333 - UNIVERSO MMA

@UniversoMMA

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,372subscribers

+322 since we began measuring on 7 October 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003985182724
TypeChannel
Username@UniversoMMA
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 October 2026
Last confirmed live26 October 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/UniversoMMA

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

1,0501,3721,2117 October 2026 — 1,050 subscribers7 October 2026 — 1,050 subscribers11 October 2026 — 1,071 subscribers17 October 2026 — 1,070 subscribers20 October 2026 — 1,100 subscribers26 October 2026 — 1,372 subscribers7 October 202626 October 2026
6 measurements spanning 19 days, net +322. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,002–1,420 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Oct 2026, 04:571,372+272
20 Oct 2026, 06:111,100+30
17 Oct 2026, 14:191,070-1
11 Oct 2026, 11:571,071+21
7 Oct 2026, 09:221,050no change
7 Oct 2026, 08:471,050first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.42%
avg views ÷ 1,372 subscribers
Avg views / post
129
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
13
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 October 2026
Posts held20 (27 September 2026 – 7 October 2026)
Views total1,421
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Oct 2026, 09:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 57s
Average length
44s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😢266.7%
❤133.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 September 2026 to 7 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Oct 2026, 00:25 UTC62 viewsread 7 October 2026
Photo

🎉 Sorteo 1K de Suscriptores!! 🎁 Premio: 30 dias suscripcion a Paramount Plus 🔥 ¡LLEGAMOS A LOS 1,000 SUSCRIPTORES EN UNIVERSO MMA! 🔥 Para agradecerles a todos por ser parte de esta gran comunidad y celebrar este hito, ¡lanzamos nuestro primer GRAN SORTEO! 🥊💥 📋 REQUISITOS PARA PARTICIPAR: 🥊 Estar suscrito a estos canales: @UniversoMMA @ufcspanish ¡Muchísimas gracias a todos por hacer crecer UNIVERSO MMA día a día…

6 Oct 2026, 13:57 UTC64 viewsread 7 October 2026
Photo

🔝 Román Kopylov ha subido a la posicion #14 en el ranking de peso medio. ¿Quién debería ser su próximo oponente?

6 Oct 2026, 12:39 UTC103 viewsread 7 October 2026
Photo

🤷‍♂️ Demetrius no entiende por qué Movsar todavía está en #UFC. Tiene un récord de 20-0 y ninguna victoria por nocaut o sumisión. Entonces, ¿por qué sigue estando en UFC? Acaban de despedir a Michael Page.

5 Oct 2026, 21:09 UTC138 viewsread 7 October 2026
Video

😄 Un resumen de cómo habría sido un enfrentamiento entre Ilia y Paddy en TUF.

5 Oct 2026, 00:53 UTC127 viewsread 7 October 2026
Photo

¡Se armó la apuesta de cabelleras en la UFC! 🥊🔥 Payton Talbott no se anda con juegos y le lanza un reto directo a Sean O'Malley: "Podemos hacer una apuesta sobre quién es noqueado... El que pierda tendrá que afeitarse el cabello". ¿Se imaginan a "Suga" Sean o a Talbott completamente calvos? ¿Quién creen que caería primero si esta pelea se llega a dar? #UFC #MMA

4 Oct 2026, 16:11 UTC134 viewsread 7 October 2026
Photo

🥊 ¡UNIVERSO MMA SIGUE CRECIENDO! 🥊 ¡Llegamos a los 1,000 suscriptores y esto no sería posible sin cada uno de ustedes! 🔥💥 Queremos celebrar este logro con la comunidad, así que tenemos una pregunta importante: ❓ ¿LES GUSTARÍA QUE HAGAMOS UN SORTEO DE CELEBRACIÓN? 🏆🎁 Reaccionen a este mensaje para saber si se suman: 🔥 — Si llegamos a suficientes reacciones, publicamos las bases y los premios hoy mismo. ¡VAMOS! 👇👊

4 Oct 2026, 03:10 UTC162 viewsread 7 October 2026
Photo

¡HISTÓRICO! UFC 332 ROMPE RÉCORD ABSOLUTO DE NOCAUTS EN EL PRIMER ASALTO 🤯💥 ¡Muchachos, acabamos de presenciar una de las carteleras más salvajes en la historia de las artes marciales mixtas! UFC 332 ha destrozado de manera oficial el récord moderno de la compañía con la mayor cantidad de finalizaciones en la primera ronda en un solo evento. Esto fue lo que dejó esta noche histórica: 9 Nocauts en el Round 1: Super…

4 Oct 2026, 02:12 UTC178 viewsread 7 October 2026
Video

Bobby Green cae ante el argentino en el primer asalto y Herd Dean entra nuevamente en polémica. #UFC332

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @UniversoMMA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“UFC 333 - UNIVERSO MMA” (@UniversoMMA), 1,372 subscribers as measured 26 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UniversoMMA.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.