Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐‘ผ๐’๐’Š๐’…๐’‚๐’… ๐‘ต๐’‚๐’„๐’Š๐’๐’๐’‚๐’ ๐‘ฌ๐’”๐’‘๐’‚รฑ๐’๐’๐’‚ ๐‘ผ๐‘ต๐‘ฌ

Channel

๐‘ผ๐’๐’Š๐’…๐’‚๐’… ๐‘ต๐’‚๐’„๐’Š๐’๐’๐’‚๐’ ๐‘ฌ๐’”๐’‘๐’‚รฑ๐’๐’๐’‚ ๐‘ผ๐‘ต๐‘ฌ

@UnidadNacionalEspanola

On this record: Topic ยท Also posting the same content ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry

7,732subscribers

-473 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 3,162โ€“10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001272928562
TypeChannel
Username@UnidadNacionalEspanola
Created15 May 2021 โ€” measured โ€” cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/UnidadNacionalEspanola

Topic

Politics & activism โ€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโ€™s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a modelโ€™s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Also posting the same content

This channelโ€™s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 4 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable โ€” 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times โ€” 60%, no better than a coin flip โ€” because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channelโ€™s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying โ€” a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story โ€” and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

7,7328,2067,9696 August 2026 โ€” 8,205 subscribers6 August 2026 โ€” 8,205 subscribers6 August 2026 โ€” 8,206 subscribers9 August 2026 โ€” 8,165 subscribers12 August 2026 โ€” 8,109 subscribers15 August 2026 โ€” 8,090 subscribers19 August 2026 โ€” 8,062 subscribers22 August 2026 โ€” 8,047 subscribers26 August 2026 โ€” 8,022 subscribers28 August 2026 โ€” 8,005 subscribers1 September 2026 โ€” 7,934 subscribers4 September 2026 โ€” 7,895 subscribers9 September 2026 โ€” 7,819 subscribers13 September 2026 โ€” 7,777 subscribers17 September 2026 โ€” 7,732 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 42 days, net -473. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 7,661โ€“8,277 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 12:397,732-45
13 Sept 2026, 14:007,777-42
9 Sept 2026, 19:557,819-76
4 Sept 2026, 03:397,895-39
1 Sept 2026, 00:397,934-71
28 Aug 2026, 22:158,005-17
26 Aug 2026, 04:238,022-25
22 Aug 2026, 21:188,047-15
19 Aug 2026, 05:558,062-28
15 Aug 2026, 20:578,090-19
12 Aug 2026, 21:568,109-56
9 Aug 2026, 16:028,165-41
6 Aug 2026, 16:308,206+1
6 Aug 2026, 10:188,205no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:018,205first reading

Engagement

42 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pages of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
65.4%
avg views รท 7,732 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,060
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.573%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 42 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held42 (5 July 2026 โ€“ 28 August 2026)
Views total35,412
Reactions total108
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 19:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
17m 18s
Average length
2m 10s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ€” not this channelโ€™s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโ€™s own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

473 reactions across 15 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
๐Ÿ‘16935.7%
๐Ÿ‘6614.0%
๐Ÿ”ฅ6513.7%
๐Ÿซก285.92%
๐Ÿคฌ183.81%
๐Ÿคฃ163.38%
๐Ÿ‘Œ153.17%
๐Ÿ˜153.17%
โšก132.75%
๐Ÿฅด102.11%
๐Ÿณ91.90%
โค81.69%
๐ŸŒš81.69%
๐Ÿ˜ˆ81.69%
๐Ÿคก51.06%
๐Ÿคฏ51.06%
๐Ÿพ40.846%
๐ŸŽ‰40.846%
๐Ÿ˜ก30.634%
๐Ÿ‘Ž10.211%
3 further kinds30.634%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 42 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 473 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC962 views23 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ CEUTA / Los ceutรญes recuperan nuestras playas del invasor magrebรญ.

๐Ÿ‘12๐Ÿซก6๐Ÿ‘3โค2

27 Aug 2026, 18:03 UTCโ‰ˆ1,030 views25 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿ“ก๐Ÿช– Informes militares detallan campaรฑas para provocar un gran apagรณn en Ceuta tras el asalto masivo.

๐Ÿคฌ14๐Ÿคฏ5๐Ÿฅด5๐Ÿ‘1

27 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTCโ‰ˆ7,170 views22 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ El escรกndalo de los vertidos en Tenerife que lleva a cuatro alcaldes al banquillo.

๐Ÿ‘9๐Ÿ‘7๐Ÿ‘Œ4๐Ÿ”ฅ2

27 Aug 2026, 17:29 UTCโ‰ˆ7,720 views22 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ / ๐Ÿคฉ๐ŸŒท Sรกnchez suspende su viaje a Andorra entre un enorme malestar por la fuga de informaciรณn.

๐Ÿคฃ10๐Ÿ˜6๐Ÿณ4๐Ÿ”ฅ2

26 Aug 2026, 15:22 UTCโ‰ˆ1,960 views16 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

๐ŸคฉSรกnchez se vuelve a ir de vacaciones: un hotel cinco estrellas gran lujo en Andorra, a 2000 โ‚ฌ la noche.

๐Ÿ”ฅ6๐Ÿคก5๐Ÿคฌ4โค1

26 Aug 2026, 15:20 UTCโ‰ˆ3,070 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Rรฉgimen Sanchestalin corrupto, traidor y criminal

25 Aug 2026, 19:55 UTCโ‰ˆ13,500 viewsread 28 August 2026
Video

๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉโ—๏ธEl secretario del Tesoro, Scott Bessent, lanza la "Operaciรณn Marginado Econรณmico", advirtiendo que los paรญses y entidades que continรบen apoyando a Irรกn podrรญan enfrentarse a sanciones de EE. UU. y perder el acceso al sistema del dรณlar.

15 Aug 2026, 06:33 UTCโ‰ˆ7,540 viewsread 28 August 2026
Video

๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ Sarna, impรฉtigo y tuberculosis desbordando Urgencias en Ceuta. Esto y cosas peores es lo que traen los invasores.

14 Aug 2026, 17:18 UTCโ‰ˆ8,400 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉโšก๐Ÿ”ด๐Ÿคฉ๐ŸŒทEl Gobierno recula y permite que la central de Almaraz siga funcionando hasta junio de 2030.

14 Aug 2026, 17:16 UTCโ‰ˆ6,510 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿš“La UCO investiga 81 cuentas desde las que se podrรญa haber pagado a Leire Dรญez por sus servicios de cloaca al PSOE.

13 Aug 2026, 16:40 UTCโ‰ˆ6,860 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ EE.UU prueba misiles de bajo coste en el desierto marroquรญ

13 Aug 2026, 16:39 UTCโ‰ˆ6,780 viewsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Nueva violaciรณn en Ceuta perpetrada por un marroquรญ esta misma maรฑana: Los Grupos de Reserva y Seguridad (GRS) de la Guardia Civil han detenido este jueves en la avenida Lisboa a un hombre de nacionalidad marroquรญ acusado de agredir sexualmente a una joven. Los hechos se produjeron alrededor de las 10.00 horas.

Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @UnidadNacionalEspanola. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegramโ€™s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโ€™s query is independent of having been queried itself.

๐‘ผ๐‘ต๐‘ฌ 80 ๐‘ฐ๐’๐’‡๐’๐’“๐’Ž๐’‚
@une80 ยท 47,477
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 84 here โ€” alongside 83 others โ€” read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegramโ€™s list for THAT channel, not this one โ€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐‘ผ๐’๐’Š๐’…๐’‚๐’… ๐‘ต๐’‚๐’„๐’Š๐’๐’๐’‚๐’ ๐‘ฌ๐’”๐’‘๐’‚รฑ๐’๐’๐’‚ ๐‘ผ๐‘ต๐‘ฌโ€ (@UnidadNacionalEspanola), 7,732 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UnidadNacionalEspanola.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.