23 measurements spanning 24 days, net -2,093. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,414–23,593 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
31 Aug 2026, 19:04
20,045
-184
30 Aug 2026, 18:27
20,229
-51
29 Aug 2026, 18:14
20,280
-644
28 Aug 2026, 14:38
20,924
-605
27 Aug 2026, 12:48
21,529
-659
26 Aug 2026, 09:42
22,188
+9,369
25 Aug 2026, 09:03
12,819
-399
24 Aug 2026, 09:03
13,218
-304
22 Aug 2026, 17:56
13,522
-1,925
21 Aug 2026, 07:25
15,447
-4,852
20 Aug 2026, 03:55
20,299
-7
19 Aug 2026, 06:54
20,306
-948
18 Aug 2026, 09:27
21,254
-78
17 Aug 2026, 10:47
21,332
-131
15 Aug 2026, 18:43
21,463
-58
14 Aug 2026, 05:38
21,521
-147
13 Aug 2026, 00:34
21,668
-130
11 Aug 2026, 21:24
21,798
-106
10 Aug 2026, 21:24
21,904
-94
9 Aug 2026, 19:01
21,998
first reading
Engagement
74 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.99%
avg views ÷ 20,045 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,200
68 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.82%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
68
of 74 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held
74 (27 July 2026 – 31 August 2026)
Views total
81,619
Reactions total
7,196
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
31 Aug 2026, 17:04 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
19s
Average length
19s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7,863 reactions across 74 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,692
34.2%
🔥
2,633
33.5%
🤝
2,538
32.3%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 74 of the 74 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,863 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 74 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
$SUI 😁😁😁😁
Whether you're just starting out or still finding your way in trading, don’t worry I’m here to help. I’ll guide you step by step with a clear process, helping you trade with more confidence and less emotion. The goal is simple: build consistency and grow your account the right way
Ready to level up your trading? DM ➡️ @JaredVennett and let’s get started
#ZK 😁😁😁😁😁
While everyone else is still waiting for the “perfect entry,” VIP+ members are already making moves, securing profits, and preparing for the next opportunity. 🫵 The market doesn’t wait for anyone and the best opportunities are often gone before the crowd even realizes what’s happening.
➡️ DM @JaredVennett to join VIP+ and get access to our exclusive signals! 😁
#BTC PLAN UPDATE - AUG 27 ✏️
After consolidating below the major resistance zone, BTC is still holding above the key $77,200 support area, keeping the short-term structure bullish
The price is likely to continue ranging before making another attempt to push toward the $79,150 – $79,200 resistance zone. A successful breakout above this area could open the way for a stronger move toward $80,000+
If BTC pulls back fir…
Member Feedback 😈😈😈
Whether you're just starting out or still finding your way in trading, don’t worry I’m here to help. I’ll guide you step by step with a clear process, helping you trade with more confidence and less emotion. The goal is simple: build consistency and grow your account the right way
Ready to level up your trading? DM ➡️ @JaredVennett and let’s get started
#BTC Perfect plan 🤝 +373%
😁😁😁😁😁
➡️DM @JaredVennett to get started, full entry, stop-loss, and target guidance
🤝44🔥29❤28
Showing the 12 most recent of 74 posts we hold for @UnicornTradingCrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@UnicornTradingCrypto edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
19 August 2026
Most recent edit
23 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“UNICORN TRADING CRYPTO” (@UnicornTradingCrypto), 20,045 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UnicornTradingCrypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.