Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ⚠️UnerkanntW⚠️

Channel

⚠️UnerkanntW⚠️

@UnerkanntW

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

106subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001849834779
TypeChannel
Username@UnerkanntW
Created22 October 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 October 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged4 times, most recently 8 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/UnerkanntW

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 26 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1061081077 August 2026 — 108 subscribers9 August 2026 — 108 subscribers29 August 2026 — 107 subscribers6 September 2026 — 106 subscribers7 August 20266 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 30 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 106–108 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 13:37106-1
29 Aug 2026, 08:15107-1
9 Aug 2026, 08:02108no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:02108first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 22 October 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 June 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

27 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1866.7%
🔥311.1%
😁311.1%
🙏27.41%
👎13.70%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 October 2022 to 1 June 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Jun 2024, 14:18 UTC254 views0 reactionsread 9 August 2026

⚠️🇷🇺🇺🇦Russo-Ukrainian War Summary for May 2024: 🔴Kherson direction: No significant changes. The situation in Krynky remains conflicted. 🔴Zaporizhzhia/Zaporozhye direction: Drone footage proved, that most Robotyne/Robotyno is under russian control, nevertheless it is very premature to say about the end of the fighting for the village. The frontline at Hulaypole/Gulyaipole was "calm", no active advancements. 🔴South-…

1 Jun 2024, 14:18 UTC267 viewsread 9 August 2026

⚠️I tried to be as neutral as possible. The Russian forces as well as the Ukrainian forces are suffering heavy losses. This summary is describing more or less the situation, that happened in May.

10 May 2024, 10:02 UTC243 viewsread 9 August 2026

And to remind everyone ❗️ Dont forget, what propaganda we saw on the 24.02.22. Ukrainian channels will now claim, that every attack was repelled, Russian forces have heavy losses and so on. Russian sources will claim, that they captured this village and that area. Propaganda will intensify in the coming hours/days. Don't believe everything you see.

10 May 2024, 08:33 UTC214 viewsread 9 August 2026

Im still not for 100% sure if its true or not. On one hand it could be true in the other hand it could be psychological warfare.

10 May 2024, 08:25 UTC201 viewsread 9 August 2026

👆We all speculated when this direction will reactivate. Everyone needs to be pacient until we know the truth, until we know what is happening there

1 May 2024, 11:07 UTC209 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Russian advances in April 2024 in the Krasnoarmeisk/Pokrovsk direction: White line: frontline as of 1st of April. Red line: Russian advances in the last 24 hours.

👍4👎1🔥1

1 May 2024, 11:06 UTC172 viewsread 9 August 2026

⚠️🇷🇺🇺🇦Russo-Ukrainian War Summary for April 2024: 🔴Kherson direction: Nothing big happened, except artillery and FPV drone strikes on each side. 🔴Zaporozhye direction: Heavy fighting continues at Robotyno/Robotyne. Neither the Russian side nor the Ukrainian side had big success. The village itself is no-mans land. 🔴South-Donetsk direction: At Urozhaynoye/Urazhayne Russian forces tried to improve their positions so…

22 Apr 2024, 13:34 UTC155 viewsread 9 August 2026

Very interesting situation currently in Ocheretyne/Ocheretyno. I wouldnt say the town fell, thats too early to say. Ukrainian forces are under heavy pressure there. Nevertheless, 47 Brigade(Ukrainian side) is still trying to counterattack, for now with unknown results. Russian forces have a massive advantage in manpower, armored vehicles and artillery. Time will tell

3 Apr 2024, 09:00 UTC204 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

⚠️🇷🇺🇺🇦It's still suprising to see how much big "intel" channels are coping. --->Best example, the big armored attack from the Russian Armed Forces towards Umanskoye/Umanske and Yasnobrodovka/Yasnobrodivka. The Russian forces used reportedly 36 Tanks and 12 personel carriers(!) Yes alot of them (12 Tanks) (unknown number of armored personnel carriers) were destroyed. Nevertheless Russian forces managed with this attac…

👍3🙏1

1 Apr 2024, 13:02 UTC164 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

⚠️🇷🇺🇺🇦Russo-Ukrainian War Summary for March 2024: 🔴Russian Armed Forces managed to advance in almost all directions. The most successfull direction was the Avdeevka-Pokrovsk direction, where the Russian forces managed to take control over Orlovka/Orlivka, Tonenkoye/Tonenke and Nevelskoye/Nevelske. In addition to that, Russian forces continued their effort to advance towards Yasnobrodovka/Yasnobrodivka and to take co…

👍4🙏1

31 Mar 2024, 14:58 UTC112 viewsread 9 August 2026

So interesting to see how much isolated and delusional each bubble on Twitter(X) is. One guy is spreading some rumors and the others are copying him. Do not believe everything, wait and be pacient. Obviously the truth will be revealed. Geolocation or same reports from both sides are the "gamechanger".

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @UnerkanntW. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“⚠️UnerkanntW⚠️” (@UnerkanntW), 106 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UnerkanntW.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.