https://www.instagram.com/reel/DbbDka9T-cw/?stkn=MTdnbXh3YTNwZ3Zmaw== Saroj Raj Choudhury 1st field director of simlipal Where & How to USe ✔️ Treated his Duty as an End ✔️ Treated Animals(/Environment) as an “end” in themselves(not as means) ✔️ Love towards weaker section Person in last mile = even animals and environment = evolved ethics @UnderStandEthicsEssay

Channel
UnderStand GS4 & Essay with Satyam Jain
@UnderStandEthicsEssay
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,926subscribers
+3,561 since we began measuring on 14 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004475878028 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @UnderStandEthicsEssay |
| Created | 14 September 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 14 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/UnderStandEthicsEssay |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 05:18 | 4,926 | +1,613 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 07:54 | 3,313 | +1,948 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 07:22 | 1,365 | first reading |
Engagement
5 posts held, back to 14 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 60.8%
- avg views ÷ 4,926 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,000
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 5
- of 5 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 5 (14 September 2026 – 14 September 2026) |
| Views total | 11,980 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Sept 2026, 07:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
Shelving Hard decisions is the least Ethical course. कठोर निर्णयों को टालना सबसे कम नैतिक मार्ग है। The 17 Minute Long Essay Brainstorming That I could fortunately give to my students before the Essay Exam this year that got exactly word by word repeated this year. @UnderStandEthicsEssay
https://www.instagram.com/reel/Dc8ywXRBfRh/?stkn=YTJsdG93a3IzM24= #PadmaAward Shankar Baba Papalkar Where do you write it in the answer? In argument on Compassion, Service to Humanity, Purpose of Life, Broad(Widest) Perception of Life. Most Importantly - He fought the state, the law for his principles his mission - and got the law reformed. Instead of? Use it instead of repetitive examples like mother teresa, gan…
@UnderStandEthicsEssay Ethics & Essay is About Linking Unique, Value Added Content to the Precise Arguments of Your Answers. Your Unique Value Added Enriched Content Should come from a lot of places like : - Padma Awards - Most Unique Philosophers, their Philosophies & Keywords - Current Affairs (from geopolitics, govt schemes, society etc) - Social Media Events & Happenings - Sports - Movies, Web Series & the entert…
Channel created
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @UnderStandEthicsEssay. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“UnderStand GS4 & Essay with Satyam Jain” (@UnderStandEthicsEssay), 4,926 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UnderStandEthicsEssay.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.