Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Ольга Умка Нейродизайн

@UmkaProekt

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,553subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001776188104
TypeChannel
Username@UmkaProekt
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/UmkaProekt

Growth

3,5503,5553,552.57 August 2026 — 3,555 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,555 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,550 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,553 subscribers3,5537 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,549–3,556 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 16:283,553+3
10 Aug 2026, 07:523,550-5
7 Aug 2026, 04:163,555no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:173,555first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.43%
avg views ÷ 3,553 subscribers
Avg views / post
193
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held12 (4 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total2,317
Reactions total12
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

12 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥650.0%
541.7%
😁18.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC136 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вчера пришло вот такое сообщение ☝🏼 Отвечу честно и разверну — потому что за этим вопросом стоит то, ради чего вообще всё затевается на воркшопе, который начнется 11 августа Я специально не продаю просто урок в записи - «посмотрел и делай сам» Вы посмотрите запись, вроде всё понятно, сядете за свой проект — и упретесь ⤵️ ▪️ мебель может встать не туда ▪️ промт переписан десять раз, а результата нет И в этот мом

1

6 Aug 2026, 10:42 UTC178 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Где взять время на нейросети, если его не хватает даже на свои проекты? Обычно кажется, что это выбор: либо учишься, либо тратишь время, чтобы просто успеть сдать. И то, и то — время, которого всегда мало. Вчера ко мне пришла дизайнер ровно с этой ситуацией: нужно было показать визуализацию клиенту, а времени разбираться самой — не было. Провели 2-часовую консультацию-практику: прошли по шагам, как из скетча и рефе

6 Aug 2026, 08:25 UTC167 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Мне часто пишут: «А зачем, я и в нанобанане картинки делаю» Отвечу не своими словами, а разбором ученицы. Она специально взяла сложный интерьер — радиусные углы, отражения в зеркале, вид в соседнюю комнату — и прогнала через разные нейросети Смотри, что она честно фиксирует: 🗣С геометрией — с планировкой, углами, конструктивом — Vizcom справляется на порядок лучше остальных. А с отражениями в зеркале не вытянул ни

🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC173 viewsread 7 August 2026

С Клодом я уже давно! Помогает мне во всем! Очень крутой👍

5 Aug 2026, 07:32 UTC219 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Мне периодически пишут по поводу учеников ⤵️ нужен человек, который умеет быстро создавать визуалы через нейросети — и готовы за это платить Сейчас я вижу, что даже опытные 3D-визуализаторы говорят: «Понимаю, что придётся научиться работать с нейросетями — это никуда не денется» Чаще всего останавливает не «не смогу», а «нет времени» ☝🏼 И тут скажу честно: отдельного времени на это не будет никогда — его выделяю

5 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC208 viewsread 7 August 2026

Покажу, где нейросеть тебя подводит — и почему это не повод бросать Ты пишешь запрос, а она: — ставит диван не той формы — двигает окно — дорисовывает лепнину, которой в проекте нет — в новом ракурсе рисует вообще другую комнату Большинство на этом сдаётся: «неуправляемо» А правда в том, что нейросеть не ошибается — она додумывает там, где ты не дала ей чёткой опоры ☝🏼 Знаешь, где именно она додумывает, — контро

4 Aug 2026, 10:14 UTC259 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Готовый мудборд для клиента - без часов в Photoshop Загружаю уже собранную визуализацию. Дальше нейросеть делает всё сама. Раньше такую доску собирали руками — часами. Теперь — пока пьёшь кофе. Промт: Создай чистый профессиональный интерьерный дизайн-борд на основе предоставленного изображения роскошной мастер-спальни, сохраняя полное соответствие дизайну рендера, включая материалы, цвета, мебель и освещение. Маке

🔥54😁1

4 Aug 2026, 09:30 UTC232 viewsread 7 August 2026

👉🏼 Что важно здесь — она не делает визуализации сама — у неё визуализаторы Недели уходят на согласование, правки по несколько дней, клиент избалован пинтерестом... Нейросеть эту боль закрывает, но только если понимаешь, как ей управлять В этом и есть смысл воркшопа — я беру человека с нуля и ставлю систему, по которой он работает сам 🚀 Старт 11 августа 👥 Мест уже 10 Стоимость — 14.990 ₽ вместо 16.990 ₽ 9 август

4 Aug 2026, 09:29 UTC213 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вот что написала дизайнер, которая пришла ко мне как раз с нуля

4 Aug 2026, 09:29 UTC197 viewsread 7 August 2026

Самый частый стоп у дизайнеров ⤵️ «Нейросети — это не для меня, я только начинаю, там сам чёрт ногу сломит»

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @UmkaProekt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 407,276 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ольга Умка Нейродизайн” (@UmkaProekt), 3,553 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UmkaProekt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.