Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ultraviolet Crypto

Channel

Ultraviolet Crypto

@UltravioletCrypto

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

3subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001763672367
TypeChannel
Username@UltravioletCrypto
Created23 April 2022measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/UltravioletCrypto

Growth

37 August 2026 — 3 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 6 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2–4 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 14:323no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:393first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 23 April 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Links
6

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👏150.0%
🔥150.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 23 April 2022 to 19 November 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Nov 2024, 04:32 UTC4 viewsread 13 August 2026
Video

Ultraviolet Crypto Chat is being protected by @Safeguard Click below to verify you're human

23 Sept 2022, 15:17 UTC8 viewsread 13 August 2026

This absolute shit that some callers promote is insane to me. There are REAL projects out there but they are too busy front running their followers 😡

4 Sept 2022, 01:43 UTC68 viewsread 13 August 2026
Poll

Which new or upcoming token are you most excited about? (Join to vote)

  1. Dracula!!!67%
  2. PennyMoonBSC7%
  3. Ballyhoo0%
  4. Freeze Token22%
  5. Universe World Cup4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

27 Jul 2022, 12:31 UTC22 viewsread 13 August 2026

Call channel play - revenue goes toward buying up token @realseadoge https://poocoin.app/tokens/0xc08fc002c5fa45a5c8451a84d3e7145364ac6d1f Definitely a unique token with rumored utility coming soon

26 Jun 2022, 13:02 UTC53 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Called PennyHeist at $84, hit almost $7k 👀 Sitting at $1.2k right now with community and devs working together like peanut butter and jelly 🍞 https://t.me/PennyHeist

👏1

25 Jun 2022, 02:36 UTC21 viewsread 13 August 2026

I dont care if I'm a small call channel. I'm having fun looking for innovative and interesting projects.

25 Jun 2022, 02:33 UTC175 viewsread 13 August 2026

PennyHeist Ultra Nanocap play $84 Tiny max wallet, tiny max buy - something like 0.0005 beans 🤣 Fun so far as I ape my village's pennies 🦍 These are the kinds of plays that can do well with community alone NFA, DYOR as always https://t.me/PennyHeist

13 Jun 2022, 14:01 UTC23 viewsread 13 August 2026

https://mobile.twitter.com/cz_binance/status/1536317704990208000

28 May 2022, 00:14 UTC17 viewsread 13 August 2026

Muunity Buy! 🟢 Spent: $32.01 (0.1 BNB) Got: 135,621,005 CMUU Buyer Position: ⬆️54.78%! Price: 0.0000002360 (0.0000000007373 BNB) MCap: $9,380 TX | Chart | Buyer | Pancakeswap

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @UltravioletCrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Sept 2022, 01:43 UTCAnonymous Poll27 voters

Which new or upcoming token are you most excited about? (Join to vote)

  1. Dracula!!!67%
  2. PennyMoonBSC7%
  3. Ballyhoo0%
  4. Freeze Token22%
  5. Universe World Cup4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 23 April 2022 to 19 November 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ultraviolet Crypto” (@UltravioletCrypto), 3 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UltravioletCrypto.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.