Ultraviolet Crypto Chat is being protected by @Safeguard Click below to verify you're human

Channel
Ultraviolet Crypto
@UltravioletCrypto
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001763672367 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @UltravioletCrypto |
| Created | 23 April 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/UltravioletCrypto |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 14:32 | 3 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:39 | 3 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 23 April 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Links
- 6
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👏 | 1 | 50.0% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 23 April 2022 to 19 November 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
This absolute shit that some callers promote is insane to me. There are REAL projects out there but they are too busy front running their followers 😡
JUNI raised more than 1300 BNB on presale 🙊
Which new or upcoming token are you most excited about? (Join to vote)
- Dracula!!!67%
- PennyMoonBSC7%
- Ballyhoo0%
- Freeze Token22%
- Universe World Cup4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Any new launches to check out?
Call channel play - revenue goes toward buying up token @realseadoge https://poocoin.app/tokens/0xc08fc002c5fa45a5c8451a84d3e7145364ac6d1f Definitely a unique token with rumored utility coming soon
Make that a high of $8.4k 🤯
🔥1
Called PennyHeist at $84, hit almost $7k 👀 Sitting at $1.2k right now with community and devs working together like peanut butter and jelly 🍞 https://t.me/PennyHeist
👏1
I dont care if I'm a small call channel. I'm having fun looking for innovative and interesting projects.
PennyHeist Ultra Nanocap play $84 Tiny max wallet, tiny max buy - something like 0.0005 beans 🤣 Fun so far as I ape my village's pennies 🦍 These are the kinds of plays that can do well with community alone NFA, DYOR as always https://t.me/PennyHeist
https://mobile.twitter.com/cz_binance/status/1536317704990208000
Muunity Buy! 🟢 Spent: $32.01 (0.1 BNB) Got: 135,621,005 CMUU Buyer Position: ⬆️54.78%! Price: 0.0000002360 (0.0000000007373 BNB) MCap: $9,380 TX | Chart | Buyer | Pancakeswap
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @UltravioletCrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Which new or upcoming token are you most excited about? (Join to vote)
- Dracula!!!67%
- PennyMoonBSC7%
- Ballyhoo0%
- Freeze Token22%
- Universe World Cup4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 23 April 2022 to 19 November 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@UltravioletCrypto named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ultraviolet Crypto” (@UltravioletCrypto), 3 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UltravioletCrypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.