Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Українська девопсарня

@UkropsDigest

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,522subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001109602442
TypeChannel
Username@UkropsDigest
Created31 March 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/UkropsDigest

Growth

3,5223,5273,524.56 August 2026 — 3,527 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,527 subscribers9 August 2026 — 3,523 subscribers12 August 2026 — 3,522 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,521–3,528 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 11:073,522-1
9 Aug 2026, 15:153,523-4
6 Aug 2026, 04:353,527no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:343,527first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 31 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
56.1%
avg views ÷ 3,522 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,980
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.936%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 July 2026
Posts held19 (31 December 202523 July 2026)
Views total7,910
Reactions total74
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

570 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍15927.9%
🔥12722.3%
😁10919.1%
9717.0%
🤔488.42%
🎉142.46%
😱81.40%
🤯71.23%
👏10.175%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 570reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2025 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Jul 2026, 09:45 UTC≈1,680 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

забув додати - розігрую дві такі мініатюри за донат від 300 грн (кожні 300 грн + шанс) 🙂

10

23 Jul 2026, 09:36 UTC≈1,790 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Мирного рішення не буде! Виграй мініатюру за донат! Новий збір на ремонт автівки 🚙 для хлопців з підрозділу Омега. Хлопці круті і перевірені, просто так не звертаються, ми вже їм вже допомагали багато разів, дуже результативні. На відео в коментарях є трішки їх роботи :) Ну і як раз сьогодні приїхали мініатюри, вже готові поїхати до нових власників. Ну правда, хто не хоче собі маленького порошенка з ножем? Розі

😁219🔥3

15 Jul 2026, 13:12 UTC≈2,210 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Яке саме тупе (але мінімально корисне) питання можна задати на інтервʼю на позицію SRE?

15 Jul 2026, 08:11 UTC≈2,230 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Такий двіж. Не очікував що за час самотності з аі усі так скучили за спілкуванням про те чи потрібен терагрант/тераформ

😁31

14 Jul 2026, 21:35 UTC≈2,330 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Зробив невеличке камюніті Можна знайти в описі групи. https://t.me/+J4zVo57GkeRhOTIy Як раз нещодавно думав як би читати усі нові коментарі в постах мамкіного архітекта і трейса. Ідея що це тільки невеликі канали (до 10 000 підписників, без двіжу і тупні) Додавайте свої чати, може вийти круто.

🤔1

14 Jun 2026, 22:31 UTC≈4,050 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Роблю дружній збір разом з Доу на хартію. Збирався завтра зранку запостити, але зараз може кращий момент. Все одно не спимо. https://send.monobank.ua/jar/6x1nhET1UX За донат кратний 200 грн розіграю подарунки, але ще не вирішив які, бо на цьому тижні став відповідальним за усі інженерні команди в компанії і поки не мав вільної хвилинки щоб придумати щось прикольне. Але я придумаю! Донатимо на Хартію і наближаємо

👍115🤯2

Signed Seva

28 May 2026, 15:21 UTC≈4,330 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Хто в мене з Wix, ви як?

🤔16

Signed Seva

18 May 2026, 21:15 UTC≈4,910 views80 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @cs_petrushenko

MIT кілька годин тому виклав всі лекції нового курсу 6.566: Computer Systems Security, Spring 2026. https://css.csail.mit.edu/6.566/2026/ Курс виглядає як крутий матеріал для тих, хто хоче глибше розібратися в computer systems security: як будуються захищені системи і де вони ламаються

🔥6414👍2

Signed Seva

12 May 2026, 09:16 UTC≈4,490 views41 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Щоб ви розуміли про орієнтацію на користувача і працюючі процеси: в тераформі я дискутував зміни в травні 2022, з’явилися в проді в тому вигляді як я пропонував в жовтні 2023 року в scalr - написав в коментах до попереднього посту вчора в 19 вечора, в п’ятій ранку вже на проді

👍28🔥13

Signed Seva

8 May 2026, 08:38 UTC≈4,590 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

а хтось використовує terrateam.io? бо щось мене terraform cloud трішки задрав і зараз обираю альтернативу (поки що між terrateam і scalr) а для пригортання уваги - дивіться який форк iterm2 з підтримкою lisquid glass

4😁4👍1

Signed Seva

15 Mar 2026, 10:38 UTC≈4,990 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026

кілька днів граюсь з https://github.com/always-further/nono TLDR воно використовує можливості ядра по обмеженню процесів для того щоб запускати різні штуки, в першу чергу аі агенти типу клоду З плюсів: • працює дуже швидко • з точки зору безпеки наче сандбокси у епла не дуже зламують • більш заточено під задачу обмежити ніж devcontainers • використовує локальні бінарі і версіі які на ноуті, не треба постійно онов

15👍3🔥1

Signed Seva

9 Mar 2026, 10:57 UTC≈7,380 views40 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

На fwdays було багато цікавих доповідей, але особливо хочу зазначити доповідь Володимира Цапа про інфраструктуру АІ агентів на базі його ж дипломної роботи. TLDR: Зараз інфраструктури для агентів існує багато, кожен своє болото хвалить, але в реальності нема належного регуляторного маніфеста, який буде обмежувати агентів і водночас буде універсальним і незалежним від конкретних фреймфорків. Володимир пропонує Aspec.

👍30🤔10

Signed Seva

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @UkropsDigest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 455,598 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Українська девопсарня” (@UkropsDigest), 3,522 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UkropsDigest.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.